PD41-04 DISTRIBUTION OF NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK RISK CLASSIFICATIONS USING MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING-ULTRASOUND FUSION VERSUS SYSTEMIC 12 CORE BIOPSIES
Khajir G, Press B, Sprenkle P, Washington S, Cooperberg M, Leapman M. PD41-04 DISTRIBUTION OF NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK RISK CLASSIFICATIONS USING MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING-ULTRASOUND FUSION VERSUS SYSTEMIC 12 CORE BIOPSIES. Journal Of Urology 2022, 207: e690. DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000002602.04.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchDistribution of NCCN risk classifications using MRI-ultrasound fusion versus systematic 12 core biopsies.
Khajir G, Press B, Levi A, Sprenkle P, Leapman M. Distribution of NCCN risk classifications using MRI-ultrasound fusion versus systematic 12 core biopsies. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2022, 40: 283-283. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.6_suppl.283.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMRI-ultrasound fusion biopsyNCCN risk classificationMRI-ultrasound fusionFusion biopsyLower riskActive surveillanceNCCN riskSystematic biopsyCore biopsyRisk classificationFirst-time biopsyInitial active surveillanceProportion of patientsMajority of patientsEra of MRIPrimary study objectiveProstate cancer risk classificationNCCN definitionsMedian PSASurveillance biopsiesBiopsy cohortRetrospective studySingle institutionProstate cancerBiopsy