2023
Correlation of HER2 low status in I-SPY2 with molecular subtype, response, and survival.
Rugo H, Wolf D, Yau C, Petricoin E, Pohlmann P, Pusztai L, Symmans W, Borowsky A, Finestone S, Yee D, Hylton N, van 't Veer L, Esserman L, DeMichele A. Correlation of HER2 low status in I-SPY2 with molecular subtype, response, and survival. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2023, 41: 514-514. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.16_suppl.514.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchDistant recurrence-free survivalPathologic complete responseBreast cancerFisher's exact testExact testMolecular subtypesHER2-negative breast cancerHigh-risk breast cancerRisk breast cancerMetastatic breast cancerRecurrence-free survivalTN breast cancerRecurrence-free survival dataCox proportional hazardsHER2 gene amplificationI-SPY2TN diseaseFree survivalOverall survivalComplete responseHazard ratioTrastuzumab deruxtecanEndocrine sensitivityT-DXdTreatment armsBiomarkers predicting response to 5 immunotherapy arms in the neoadjuvant I-SPY2 trial for early-stage breast cancer (BC): Evaluation of immune subtyping in the response predictive subtypes (RPS).
Wolf D, Yau C, Campbell M, Glas A, Mittempergher L, Kuilman M, Barcaru A, Brown Swigart L, Nanda R, Chien A, Pusztai L, Stringer-Reasor E, Shatsky R, Isaacs C, Perlmutter J, DeMichele A, Yee D, Esserman L, van 't Veer L. Biomarkers predicting response to 5 immunotherapy arms in the neoadjuvant I-SPY2 trial for early-stage breast cancer (BC): Evaluation of immune subtyping in the response predictive subtypes (RPS). Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2023, 41: 102-102. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.16_suppl.102.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPCR rateBreast cancerImmune markersSerious immune-related adverse eventsImmune-related adverse eventsHER2-negative breast cancerEarly-stage breast cancerI-SPY2 trialLower mast cellTumor immune signatureChemokines/cytokinesSingle-sample classifierImmune subtypingImmunotherapy armI-SPY2Therapy armAdverse eventsReceptor statusControl armDrug classesMast cellsLogistic regressionBenjamini-Hochberg methodHR subsetTumor cells
2022
Molecular differences between younger versus older ER-positive and HER2-negative breast cancers
Qing T, Karn T, Rozenblit M, Foldi J, Marczyk M, Shan N, Blenman K, Holtrich U, Kalinsky K, Meric-Bernstam F, Pusztai L. Molecular differences between younger versus older ER-positive and HER2-negative breast cancers. Npj Breast Cancer 2022, 8: 119. PMID: 36344517, PMCID: PMC9640562, DOI: 10.1038/s41523-022-00492-0.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchBreast cancerYounger patientsHER2-negative breast cancerNode-positive breast cancerNode-negative diseaseSame clinical featuresHigh mutation burdenLower mRNA expressionAdjuvant chemotherapyMicroarray cohortTAILORx trialOvarian suppressionOlder patientsPatient ageClinical featuresProliferation-related gene expressionScore 0Mutation burdenCopy number gainsOlder womenGATA3 mutationsAge groupsGene signatureMRNA expressionChemotherapy
2021
21-Gene Assay to Inform Chemotherapy Benefit in Node-Positive Breast Cancer
Kalinsky K, Barlow WE, Gralow JR, Meric-Bernstam F, Albain KS, Hayes DF, Lin NU, Perez EA, Goldstein LJ, Chia SKL, Dhesy-Thind S, Rastogi P, Alba E, Delaloge S, Martin M, Kelly CM, Ruiz-Borrego M, Gil-Gil M, Arce-Salinas CH, Brain EGC, Lee ES, Pierga JY, Bermejo B, Ramos-Vazquez M, Jung KH, Ferrero JM, Schott AF, Shak S, Sharma P, Lew DL, Miao J, Tripathy D, Pusztai L, Hortobagyi GN. 21-Gene Assay to Inform Chemotherapy Benefit in Node-Positive Breast Cancer. New England Journal Of Medicine 2021, 385: 2336-2347. PMID: 34914339, PMCID: PMC9096864, DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2108873.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansLymphatic MetastasisMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPostmenopausePremenopauseProspective StudiesReceptor, ErbB-2Receptors, SteroidReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionConceptsInvasive disease-free survivalDistant relapse-free survivalDisease-free survivalRelapse-free survivalChemotherapy benefitRecurrence scoreBreast cancerChemoendocrine therapyAdjuvant chemotherapyPostmenopausal womenPremenopausal womenLymph nodesAxillary lymph node-negative breast cancerLymph node-negative breast cancerPositive axillary lymph nodesHER2-negative breast cancerNode-positive breast cancerHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2Epidermal growth factor receptor 2Positive lymph node diseasePositive lymph nodesSecondary end pointsAxillary lymph nodesLymph node diseaseGrowth factor receptor 2A Randomized Trial of Fulvestrant, Everolimus, and Anastrozole for the Front-line Treatment of Patients with Advanced Hormone Receptor–positive Breast Cancer, SWOG S1222SWOG S1222
Moore HCF, Barlow WE, Somlo G, Gralow JR, Schott AF, Hayes DF, Kuhn P, Hicks JB, Welter L, Dy PA, Yeon CH, Conlin AK, Balcueva E, Lew DL, Tripathy D, Pusztai L, Hortobagyi GN. A Randomized Trial of Fulvestrant, Everolimus, and Anastrozole for the Front-line Treatment of Patients with Advanced Hormone Receptor–positive Breast Cancer, SWOG S1222SWOG S1222. Clinical Cancer Research 2021, 28: 611-617. PMID: 34844978, PMCID: PMC9782801, DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-3131.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsProgression-free survivalHER2-negative breast cancerFirst-line treatmentBreast cancerAdvanced hormone receptor-positive breast cancerAdvanced hormone-sensitive breast cancerHER2-negative advanced breast cancerHormone receptor-positive breast cancerHormone-sensitive breast cancerRandomized placebo-controlled trialReceptor-positive breast cancerCombination endocrine therapyMetastatic hormone receptorPlacebo-controlled trialAdvanced breast cancerMainstay of treatmentFront-line treatmentBaseline CTCsEndocrine therapyEndocrine treatmentPostmenopausal womenMetastatic diseaseOverall survivalPrognostic impactSystemic therapyGanitumab and metformin plus standard neoadjuvant therapy in stage 2/3 breast cancer
Yee D, Isaacs C, Wolf DM, Yau C, Haluska P, Giridhar KV, Forero-Torres A, Jo Chien A, Wallace AM, Pusztai L, Albain KS, Ellis ED, Beckwith H, Haley BB, Elias AD, Boughey JC, Kemmer K, Yung RL, Pohlmann PR, Tripathy D, Clark AS, Han HS, Nanda R, Khan QJ, Edmiston KK, Petricoin EF, Stringer-Reasor E, Falkson CI, Majure M, Mukhtar RA, Helsten TL, Moulder SL, Robinson PA, Wulfkuhle JD, Brown-Swigart L, Buxton M, Clennell JL, Paoloni M, Sanil A, Berry S, Asare SM, Wilson A, Hirst GL, Singhrao R, Asare AL, Matthews JB, Hylton NM, DeMichele A, Melisko M, Perlmutter J, Rugo HS, Fraser Symmans W, van‘t Veer L, Berry DA, Esserman LJ. Ganitumab and metformin plus standard neoadjuvant therapy in stage 2/3 breast cancer. Npj Breast Cancer 2021, 7: 131. PMID: 34611148, PMCID: PMC8492731, DOI: 10.1038/s41523-021-00337-2.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchBreast cancerPredictive biomarkersPathologic complete response rateStage 2/3 breast cancerHER2-negative breast cancerPhase 2 clinical trialType I insulin-like growth factor receptorDrug-induced hyperglycemiaStandard neoadjuvant therapyComplete response rateUse of metforminI insulin-like growth factor receptorInsulin-like growth factor receptorPutative predictive biomarkersGrowth factor receptorI-SPY2Neoadjuvant therapyNeoadjuvant treatmentTreatment armsClinical trialsElevated hemoglobinNovel agentsGanitumabResponse rateCare paclitaxelTumor-Specific Major Histocompatibility-II Expression Predicts Benefit to Anti–PD-1/L1 Therapy in Patients With HER2-Negative Primary Breast CancerMHC-II Is an Immunotherapy Biomarker in Early Breast Cancer
Gonzalez-Ericsson PI, Wulfkhule JD, Gallagher RI, Sun X, Axelrod ML, Sheng Q, Luo N, Gomez H, Sanchez V, Sanders M, Pusztai L, Petricoin E, Blenman K, Balko JM, Team I, Leyland-Jones B, Agency C, Chia S, Serpanchy R, Yu C, University E, McMillan S, Mosley R, Nguyen K, Wood E, Zelnak A, University G, Dillis C, Donnelly R, Harrington T, Isaacs C, Kallakury B, Liu M, Lynce F, Oppong B, Pohlmann P, Tousimis E, Warren R, Willey S, Wong J, Zeck J, Center L, Albain K, Bartolotta M, Bova D, Brooks C, Busby B, Czaplicki K, Duan X, Gamez R, Ganesh K, Gaynor E, Godellas C, Grace-Louthen C, Kuritza T, Lo S, Nagamine A, Perez C, Robinson P, Rosi D, Vaince F, Ward K, Hospital I, Choquette K, Edmiston K, Gallimore H, McGovern J, Mokarem K, Pajaniappan M, Rassulova S, Scott K, Sherwood K, Wright J, Clinic A, Anderson K, Gray R, Myers S, Northfelt D, Pockaj B, Roedig J, Wasif N, Clinic R, Arens A, Boughey J, Brandt K, Carroll J, Chen B, Connors A, Degnim A, Farley D, Greenlee S, Haddad T, Hieken T, Hobday T, Jakub J, Liberte L, Liu M, Loprinzi C, Menard L, Moe M, Moynihan T, O'Sullivan C, Olson E, Peethambaram P, Ruddy K, Russell B, Rynearson A, Smith D, Visscher D, Windish A, Institute H, Cox K, Dawson K, Newton O, Ramirez W, University O, Bengtson H, Bucher J, Chui S, Gilbert-Ghormley B, Hampton R, Kemmer K, Kurdyla D, Nauman D, Spear J, Wilson A, Institute S, Beatty D, Dawson P, Ellis E, Fer M, Hanson J, Goetz M, Haddad T, Iriarte D, Kaplan H, Porter B, Rinn K, Thomas H, Thornton S, Tickman R, Varghis N, Birmingham U, Caterinichia V, Santos J, Falkson C, Forero A, Krontiras H, Vaklavas C, Wei S, University of Arizona, Bauland A, Inclan L, Lewallen D, Powell A, Roney C, Schmidt K, Viscusi R, Wright H, University of California S, Blair S, Boles S, Bykowski J, Datnow B, Densley L, Eghtedari M, Genna V, Hasteh F, Helsten T, Kormanik P, Ojeda-Fournier H, Onyeacholem I, Parker B, Podsada K, Schwab R, Wallace A, Yashar C, University of California S, Alvarado M, Au A, Balassanian R, Benz C, Buxton M, Chen Y, Chien J, D'Andrea C, Davis S, Esserman L, Ewing C, Goga A, Hirst G, Hwang M, Hylton N, Joe B, Lyandres J, Kadafour M, Krings G, Melisko M, Moasser M, Munter P, Ngo Z, Park J, Price E, Rugo H, Veer L, Wong J, Yau C, University of Chicago, Abe H, Jaskowiak N, Nanda R, Olopade F, Schacht D, University of Colorado D, Borges V, Colvin T, Diamond J, Elias A, Finlayson C, Fisher C, Hardesty L, Kabos P, Kounalakis N, Mayordomo J, McSpadden T, Murphy C, Rabinovitch R, Sams S, Shagisultanova E, University of Kansas, Baccaray S, Khan Q, University of Minnesota, Beckwith H, Blaes A, Emory T, Haddad T, Hui J, Klein M, Kuehn-Hajder J, Nelson M, Potter D, Tuttle T, Yee D, Zera R, University of Pennsylvania, Bayne L, Bradbury A, Clark A, DeMichele A, Domchek S, Fisher C, Fox K, Frazee D, Lackaye M, Matro J, McDonald E, Rosen M, Shah P, Tchou J, Volpe M, Center U, Alvarez R, Barcenas C, Berry D, Booser D, Brewster A, Brown P, Gonzalez-Angulo A, Ibrahim N, Karuturi M, Koenig K, Moulder S, Murray J, Murthy R, Pusztai L, Saigal B, Symmans W, Tripathy D, Theriault R, Ueno N, Valero V, California U, Brown M, Carranza M, Flores Y, Lang J, Luna A, Perez N, Tripathy D, Watkins K, Center U, Armstrong S, Boyd C, Chen L, Clark V, Frankel A, Euhus D, Froehlich T, Goudreau S, Haley B, Harker-Murray A, Klemow D, Leitch A, Leon R, Li H, Morgan T, Qureshi N, Rao R, Reeves M, Rivers A, Sadeghi N, Seiler S, Staves B, Tagoe V, Thomas G, Tripathy D, Unni N, Weyandt S, Wooldridge R, Zuckerman J, Universty of Washington, Korde L, Griffin M, Butler B, Cundy A, Rubinstein L, Hixson C. Tumor-Specific Major Histocompatibility-II Expression Predicts Benefit to Anti–PD-1/L1 Therapy in Patients With HER2-Negative Primary Breast CancerMHC-II Is an Immunotherapy Biomarker in Early Breast Cancer. Clinical Cancer Research 2021, 27: 5299-5306. PMID: 34315723, PMCID: PMC8792110, DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-0607.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsStandard neoadjuvant chemotherapyTriple-negative breast cancerNeoadjuvant chemotherapyBreast cancerMHC-IITumor cellsAnti-PD-1/L1 therapyEstrogen receptor-positive breast cancerPhase II/III clinical trialsNeoadjuvant breast cancer settingPathologic complete response rateHER2-negative breast cancerReceptor-positive breast cancerAddition of immunotherapyHLA-DR positivityBreast cancer settingComplete response rateHER2-negative patientsCohort of patientsEarly breast cancerMHC-II expressionPan-cancer biomarkerImmunotherapy benefitL1 therapyMost patientsDurvalumab with olaparib and paclitaxel for high-risk HER2-negative stage II/III breast cancer: Results from the adaptively randomized I-SPY2 trial
Pusztai L, Yau C, Wolf DM, Han HS, Du L, Wallace AM, String-Reasor E, Boughey JC, Chien AJ, Elias AD, Beckwith H, Nanda R, Albain KS, Clark AS, Kemmer K, Kalinsky K, Isaacs C, Thomas A, Shatsky R, Helsten TL, Forero-Torres A, Liu MC, Brown-Swigart L, Petricoin EF, Wulfkuhle JD, Asare SM, Wilson A, Singhrao R, Sit L, Hirst GL, Berry S, Sanil A, Asare AL, Matthews JB, Perlmutter J, Melisko M, Rugo HS, Schwab RB, Symmans WF, Yee D, Van't Veer LJ, Hylton NM, DeMichele AM, Berry DA, Esserman LJ. Durvalumab with olaparib and paclitaxel for high-risk HER2-negative stage II/III breast cancer: Results from the adaptively randomized I-SPY2 trial. Cancer Cell 2021, 39: 989-998.e5. PMID: 34143979, PMCID: PMC11064785, DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2021.05.009.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHER2-negative breast cancerTriple-negative breast cancerI-SPY2 trialBreast cancerNeoadjuvant chemotherapyStage II/III HER2-negative breast cancerStage II/III breast cancerGrade 3 adverse eventsPathologic complete response ratePD-L1 inhibitor durvalumabMast cell signaturePaclitaxel neoadjuvant chemotherapyComplete response rateHER2-negative patientsStandard neoadjuvant chemotherapyHER2-negative cancersPARP inhibitor olaparibAdverse eventsGene expression signaturesCare controlSuperior efficacyImmune responseResponse rateCancerInhibitor olaparibPredicted sensitivity to endocrine therapy for stage II-III hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative (HR+/HER2−) breast cancer before chemo-endocrine therapy
Du L, Yau C, Brown-Swigart L, Gould R, Krings G, Hirst G, Bedrosian I, Layman R, Carter J, Klein M, Venters S, Shad S, van der Noordaa M, Chien A, Haddad T, Isaacs C, Pusztai L, Albain K, Nanda R, Tripathy D, Liu M, Boughey J, Schwab R, Hylton N, DeMichele A, Perlmutter J, Yee D, Berry D, Veer L, Valero V, Esserman L, Symmans W. Predicted sensitivity to endocrine therapy for stage II-III hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative (HR+/HER2−) breast cancer before chemo-endocrine therapy. Annals Of Oncology 2021, 32: 642-651. PMID: 33617937, DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.02.011.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsResidual cancer burdenI-SPY2 trialIndependent prognostic informationPrognostic informationBreast cancerPrognostic signaturePre-treatment tumor biopsiesHER2-negative breast cancerStage IIDistant relapse-free survivalMultivariate Cox regression modelHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2Epidermal growth factor receptor 2Chemo-endocrine therapyEndocrine-based treatmentAdjuvant endocrine therapyGrowth factor receptor 2Primary outcome measureRelapse-free survivalSimilar prognostic informationCox regression modelMolecular prognostic signaturesNegative breast cancerFactor receptor 2MDACC cohort
2019
P359 Phase III randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating the use of adjuvant endocrine therapy±everolimusin patients with high-risk, hormone receptor (HR) positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (BC): SWOG/NRG/Alliance S1207 (NCT01674140)
Chavez-Macgregor M, Barlow W, Pusztai L, Rastogi P, Ganz P, Mamounas E, Bandos H, Miao J, Gralow J, Hortobagyi G, investigators S. P359 Phase III randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating the use of adjuvant endocrine therapy±everolimusin patients with high-risk, hormone receptor (HR) positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (BC): SWOG/NRG/Alliance S1207 (NCT01674140). The Breast 2019, 44: s139. DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9776(19)30460-6.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2017
Revisiting the definition of estrogen receptor positivity in HER2-negative primary breast cancer
Fujii T, Kogawa T, Dong W, Sahin AA, Moulder S, Litton JK, Tripathy D, Iwamoto T, Hunt KK, Pusztai L, Lim B, Shen Y, Ueno NT. Revisiting the definition of estrogen receptor positivity in HER2-negative primary breast cancer. Annals Of Oncology 2017, 28: 2420-2428. PMID: 28961844, PMCID: PMC5834134, DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx397.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHER2-negative primary breast cancerAdjuvant hormonal therapyPrimary breast cancerTriple-negative breast cancerEstrogen receptor positivityHormonal therapyBreast cancerER expressionNeoadjuvant chemotherapyOverall survivalReceptor positivityPathological complete response rateHER2-negative breast cancerStage IIHuman epidermal growth factor 2Better long-term outcomesEpidermal growth factor 2Complete response rateProgesterone receptor expressionLong-term outcomesNegative breast cancerTerms of pCRLogistic regression modelsDefinitive surgeryGrowth factor 2
2013
A comparative analysis of distant recurrence risk assessments by Oncotype DX recurrence score alone and integrated with clinicopathologic factors in early-stage breast cancer.
Kelly C, Beamish R, McCaffrey J, SMITH M, Crown J, O'Connor M, McGee S, O'Reilly S, Moylan E, Gonzalez-Angulo A, Litton J, Pusztai L, Kelly C. A comparative analysis of distant recurrence risk assessments by Oncotype DX recurrence score alone and integrated with clinicopathologic factors in early-stage breast cancer. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2013, 31: 598-598. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.598.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchRisk of recurrenceOncotype DX recurrence scoreRecurrence scoreDX recurrence scoreClinicopathologic factorsBreast cancerRecurrence risk assessmentDistant recurrenceNode negativeIR groupOncotype DXRisk groupsHER-2 negative breast cancerHER2-negative breast cancerEarly-stage breast cancerProportion of patientsOncotype DX testingNegative breast cancerChemotherapy benefitNodal statusPatient chartsTumor sizeClinical trialsAcademic hospitalLR group
2012
Assessment of method of breast cancer detection and Onco type DX recurrence score.
Kelly C, Parker I, McCaffrey J, Crown J, O'Connor M, McGee S, Pusztai L, Kelly C. Assessment of method of breast cancer detection and Onco type DX recurrence score. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2012, 30: 581-581. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.581.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchRecurrence scoreClinicopathological variablesBreast cancerLymph nodesHER-2 negative breast cancerSignificant associationHER2-negative breast cancerFavorable pathological characteristicsTraditional clinicopathological variablesScreen-detected cancersNumber of patientsDX recurrence scoreNegative breast cancerMethod of detectionOncotypeDX recurrence scoreLymphovascular invasionBetter prognosisInterval cancersPatient chartsRoutine careTumor sizePathological characteristicsPrognostic informationTumor gradeClinical trials
2008
Genomic predictors of pathologic response to preoperative chemotherapy for triple-negative and ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancers
Hatzis C, Symmans W, Lin F, Zheng B, Yan K, Booser D, Gong Y, Valero V, Hortobagyi G, Pusztai L. Genomic predictors of pathologic response to preoperative chemotherapy for triple-negative and ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancers. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2008, 26: 571-571. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.571.Peer-Reviewed Original Research