2023
Moderators and Mediators of the Interpretation Bias–Emotional Disorders Link
Gadassi Polack R, Davis A, Joormann J. Moderators and Mediators of the Interpretation Bias–Emotional Disorders Link. CBT: Science Into Practice 2023, 55-77. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-23650-1_4.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchEmotional disordersInterpretation biasInterpretation biasesProminent cognitive theoryEmotion regulationMaladaptive strategiesCognitive theoryDevelopmental sampleInterpersonal factorsPotential moderatorsLongitudinal examinationModeratorCurrent chapterBiasesDisordersBiasStimuliExperimental designSignificant supportCentral mechanismsRelationshipMediationMultiple factorsMediatorsCross-sectional studySocial impression formation and depression: examining cognitive flexibility and bias
Deng W, Cannon T, Joormann J. Social impression formation and depression: examining cognitive flexibility and bias. Cognition & Emotion 2023, 37: 137-146. PMID: 36607322, DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2023.2165043.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSocial impression formationImpression formationImpression ratingsNegative interpretation biasSocial interaction partnersFuture social interactionsDepressive symptomsCognitive flexibilityInterpretation biasNegative interpretationsNegative contextPositive contextNegative evaluationSocial situationsPositive interpretationSocial interactionScenario typesSocial isolationInteraction partnersRatingsDepressionTaskNovel charactersScenario outcomesBias
2022
Developing a novel assessment of interpretation flexibility: Reliability, validity and clinical implications
Deng W, Everaert J, Creighton M, Bronstein M, Cannon T, Joormann J. Developing a novel assessment of interpretation flexibility: Reliability, validity and clinical implications. Personality And Individual Differences 2022, 190: 111548. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2022.111548.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchInterpretation biasHigh-level cognitive deficitsPicture-based tasksStrong convergent validitySocial anxietySymptoms of depressionTransdiagnostic factorVerbal stimuliVerbal measuresNegative interpretationsStimulus modalityPersecutory ideationCognitive deficitsReliable paradigmGeneral population sampleConvergent validityDevelopmental studiesInflexibilityTaskPsychotic symptomsAffective disordersClinical implicationsNovel assessmentBiasPopulation sample
2018
Looking Through Tinted Glasses: Depression and Social Anxiety Are Related to Both Interpretation Biases and Inflexible Negative Interpretations
Everaert J, Bronstein M, Cannon T, Joormann J. Looking Through Tinted Glasses: Depression and Social Anxiety Are Related to Both Interpretation Biases and Inflexible Negative Interpretations. Clinical Psychological Science 2018, 6: 517-528. DOI: 10.1177/2167702617747968.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchSocial anxietyInterpretation biasInterpretation biasesNegative interpretationsPositive interpretation biasesNovel cognitive taskNegative interpretation biasDepression severityCognitive tasksCognitive riskPositive informationAmbiguous situationsInflexible interpretationsAnxietyInflexibilitySymptom typeDepressionBiasesBiasSevere depressionFuture workTaskParticipantsIndividualsImportant determinant
2004
Attentional Biases for Negative Interpersonal Stimuli in Clinical Depression
Gotlib I, Krasnoperova E, Yue D, Joormann J. Attentional Biases for Negative Interpersonal Stimuli in Clinical Depression. Journal Of Psychopathology And Clinical Science 2004, 113: 127-135. PMID: 14992665, DOI: 10.1037/0021-843x.113.1.121.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsGeneralized anxiety disorderAttentional biasesDepressed participantsEmotion of sadnessNonpsychiatric control participantsInformation processing paradigmAttentional biasHappy facesInterpersonal stimuliInterpersonal functioningDepressed individualsAnxiety disordersControl participantsClinical depressionFuture researchSadnessParticipantsBiasesFaceDepressionEmotionsAngerHappinessBiasFunctioning