2000
Hepatic MR Imaging with a Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Isotropic Volumetric Interpolated Breath-hold Examination: Feasibility, Reproducibility, and Technical Quality
Lee V, Lavelle M, Rofsky N, Laub G, Thomasson D, Krinsky G, Weinreb J. Hepatic MR Imaging with a Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Isotropic Volumetric Interpolated Breath-hold Examination: Feasibility, Reproducibility, and Technical Quality. Radiology 2000, 215: 365-72. PMID: 10796909, DOI: 10.1148/radiology.215.2.r00ma16365.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdipose TissueAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesContrast MediaFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGadolinium DTPAHepatic ArteryHepatic VeinsHumansImage EnhancementImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLiverLiver DiseasesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPortal VeinQuality ControlReproducibility of ResultsRespirationVena Cava, InferiorConceptsContrast materialMagnetic resonance imaging examinationsPatient underwent repeatVascular anatomic variantsDynamic contrastPortal venous phaseArterial dominanceUnderwent repeatVenous anatomyAnatomic variantsImaging examinationsTest bolusTest doseVenous phaseArterial phaseRepeat studyHepatic MRGadopentetate dimeglumineGradient-echo imagingTechnical qualityEnhanced acquisitionMaximal enhancementBreath-hold imagesOriginal study
1992
Hepatic MR imaging with Mn-DPDP: safety, image quality, and sensitivity.
Bernardino M, Young S, Lee J, Weinreb J. Hepatic MR imaging with Mn-DPDP: safety, image quality, and sensitivity. Radiology 1992, 183: 53-8. PMID: 1549694, DOI: 10.1148/radiology.183.1.1549694.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMn-DPDPMore lesionsAdditional lesionsT1-weighted imagesDose groupSerious side effectsMagnetic resonance imagingT2-weighted imagesFocal hepatic diseaseN'-dipyridoxylethylenediamineIntravenous bolusHepatic diseaseMultiinstitutional studyPatientsSide effectsLesionsResonance imagingHepatic MRManganese NImaging parametersContrast agentsImagingGroupInfusionBolus