2024
Risk of Pancreatitis After Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Magahis P, Chhoda A, Berzin T, Farrell J, Wright D, Rizvi A, Hanscom M, Carr-Locke D, Sampath K, Sharaiha R, Mahadev S. Risk of Pancreatitis After Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The American Journal Of Gastroenterology 2024 PMID: 38976379, DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002942.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPancreatic cystic lesionsPancreatitis riskSystematic reviewEUS-TTNBRisk factorsCystic lesionsDerSimonian-Laird methodEnglish-language studiesEndoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirationRandom-effects modelUltrasound-guided fine-needle aspirationRisk of post-procedure pancreatitisPredisposing characteristicsFine-needle-aspirationRisk of pancreatitisFine-needle aspirationPost-procedure pancreatitisLaird methodMeta-regressionSystematic searchPooled riskMeta-analyzedMeta-analysisPancreatitis eventsNeedle aspirationDisparities in race, ethnicity, sex, and age inclusion in pancreatic cancer screening studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Silva-Santisteban A, Hernandez Woodbine M, Noriega M, Rabinowitz L, Grimshaw A, Farrell J, Chhoda A, Sawhney M. Disparities in race, ethnicity, sex, and age inclusion in pancreatic cancer screening studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2024, 100: 1-16.e20. PMID: 38432492, DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.02.014.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCancer screening studyPopulation-based benchmarksPancreatic cancer screeningProportion of study participantsScreening studiesPancreatic cancer outcomesAge reportingInclusion of participantsMedian participant ageCancer screeningCancer outcomesStudy qualityWeb of Science Core CollectionNon-LatinoStudy participantsParticipant agePancreatic cancer studiesYear of publicationOvid MEDLINEGeneral populationSystematic reviewMeta-regressionSystematic searchScience Core CollectionOvid Embase
2022
Tu1185: DOES CURRENT EVIDENCE SUPPORT CYST GROWTH RATE AS A WORRISOME FEATURE? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
Singh S, Chhoda A, Vodusek Z, Khatri R, Gunderson C, McCarty T, Sharma P, Grimshaw A, Kunstman J, Sharma A, Ahuja N, Gonda T, Farrell J. Tu1185: DOES CURRENT EVIDENCE SUPPORT CYST GROWTH RATE AS A WORRISOME FEATURE? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS. Gastroenterology 2022, 162: s-907. DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(22)62148-6.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2021
Sa298 IS IT SAFE TO STOP SURVEILLANCE OF PANCREATIC CYSTS AFTER 5 YEARS OF STABILITY?: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF CURRENT EVIDENCE.
Chhoda A, Singh S, Sheth A, Sharma P, Sharma A, Kunstman J, Grimshaw A, Ahuja N, Farrell J. Sa298 IS IT SAFE TO STOP SURVEILLANCE OF PANCREATIC CYSTS AFTER 5 YEARS OF STABILITY?: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF CURRENT EVIDENCE. Gastroenterology 2021, 160: s-475. DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(21)01841-2.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchSa302 IS MULTIFOCALITY IN INTRADUCTAL PAPILLARY MUCINOUS NEOPLASMS A RISK FACTOR FOR PANCREATIC MALIGNANCY?: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
Chhoda A, Singh S, Grimshaw A, Sheth A, Sharma A, Kunstman J, Ahuja N, Farrell J. Sa302 IS MULTIFOCALITY IN INTRADUCTAL PAPILLARY MUCINOUS NEOPLASMS A RISK FACTOR FOR PANCREATIC MALIGNANCY?: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS. Gastroenterology 2021, 160: s-477. DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(21)01845-x.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2020
Su1486 LONG-TERM SURVEILLANCE OF LOW-RISK PRESUMED MUCINOUS CYSTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
Chhoda A, singh S, Sheth A, Grimshaw A, Farrell J. Su1486 LONG-TERM SURVEILLANCE OF LOW-RISK PRESUMED MUCINOUS CYSTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS. Gastroenterology 2020, 158: s-599. DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(20)32200-9.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2019
67 Appraisal of Follow-up Protocols and Outcomes of High Risk Pancreatic Cancer Surveillance Programs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Chhoda A, Mukherjee E, Wattamwar K, Kastrinos F, Farrell J. 67 Appraisal of Follow-up Protocols and Outcomes of High Risk Pancreatic Cancer Surveillance Programs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The American Journal Of Gastroenterology 2019, 114: s40-s41. DOI: 10.14309/01.ajg.0000589800.17291.ef.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchHigh-risk individualsCross-sectional imagingEndoscopic ultrasoundPancreatic cancerDiagnostic rateSectional imagingSystematic reviewPt-yrNew lesionsBaseline imagingAdvanced pathologyCumulative progression rateCancer Surveillance ProgramOptimal imaging modalityPre-existing abnormalitiesSignificant differencesOutcomes of interestRandom-effects modelFirst systematic reviewUncontrolled studiesProspective studySubgroup analysisSurveillance protocolHistologic diagnosisProgression rate