2023
SCAI/HRS Expert Consensus Statement on Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure
Saw J, Holmes D, Cavalcante J, Freeman J, Goldsweig A, Kavinsky C, Moussa I, Munger T, Price M, Reisman M, Sherwood M, Turi Z, Wang D, Whisenant B. SCAI/HRS Expert Consensus Statement on Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure. Journal Of The Society For Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions 2023, 2: 100577. PMID: 39130704, PMCID: PMC11307869, DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100577.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAtrial appendage closureAppendage closureConsensus statementTranscatheter Left Atrial Appendage ClosureLeft atrial appendage closureImportant clinical trialsExpert consensus statementLeft atrial appendageCardiovascular Computed TomographyDrug Administration approvalEvidence-based best practicesThromboembolic riskWatchman deviceLAAC procedureAtrial fibrillationAtrial appendageAdministration approvalClinical trialsCardiovascular AngiographyAmerican CollegeComputed tomographyClinical developmentClinical practiceEndovascular devices
2022
Development and validation of an automated algorithm for end point adjudication for a large U.S. national registry
Friedman DJ, Pierre D, Wang Y, Gambone L, Koutras C, Segawa C, Farb A, Vemulapalli S, Varosy PD, Masoudi FA, Lansky A, Curtis JP, Freeman JV. Development and validation of an automated algorithm for end point adjudication for a large U.S. national registry. American Heart Journal 2022, 254: 102-111. PMID: 36007567, DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.08.006.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsEnd point adjudicationCEC adjudicationEnd pointLarge registriesClinical trialsNational Cardiovascular Data RegistryMajor vascular complicationsU.S. National RegistryPost-discharge eventsAgreement rateMajor bleedingNeurologic eventsVascular complicationsNational registryEvent adjudicationData registryRegistryCommittee's evaluationsPercent agreementGold standardAgreement thresholdHospitalTrialsFurther confirmationBleedingPatient-Level Analysis of Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Practice Versus Clinical Trials
Friedman DJ, Du C, Wang Y, Agarwal V, Varosy PD, Masoudi FA, Holmes DR, Reddy VY, Price MJ, Curtis JP, Freeman JV. Patient-Level Analysis of Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Practice Versus Clinical Trials. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions 2022, 15: 950-961. PMID: 35512918, PMCID: PMC9370831, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.02.029.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRegistry patientsHemorrhagic stroke riskIschemic strokeWarfarin patientsTrial patientsStroke riskLAAO patientsClinical practiceMore pericardial effusionsPeriprocedural ischemic strokePropensity-matched analysisAtrial appendage occlusionCox proportional hazardsPatient-level dataFine-Gray modelMore comorbiditiesPROTECT AFNoncardiovascular deathPericardial effusionHemorrhagic strokeAppendage occlusionDevice implantationTrial criteriaClinical trialsSimilar risk
2021
Heart Watch Study: protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
Dhruva SS, Shah ND, Vemulapalli S, Deshmukh A, Beatty AL, Gamble GM, Freeman JV, Hummel JP, Piccini JP, Akar JG, Ervin K, Arges KL, Emanuel L, Noseworthy PA, Hu T, Bartlett V, Ross JS. Heart Watch Study: protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2021, 11: e054550. PMID: 35234659, PMCID: PMC8719216, DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054550.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHealthcare utilisationSecondary outcomesAtrial fibrillationAtrial flutterDuke University Health SystemRoutine clinical care settingsAtrial Fibrillation EffectLife global scoresTime of cardioversionAdditional secondary outcomesPopulation of patientsPatient-reported outcomesClinical care settingsUniversity Health SystemQuality of lifeInstitutional review boardMulticentre pragmaticPeer-reviewed journalsPrimary outcomePatients' qualityTrial protocolClinical trialsMayo ClinicECG featuresCare settingsB-PO03-155 OUTCOMES OF LEFT ATRIAL APPENDAGE OCCLUSION WITH WATCHMAN IN CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL PRACTICE COMPARED WITH CLINICAL TRIALS: A POOLED ANALYSIS OF PROTECT-AF, PREVAIL, AND THE NCDR LAAO REGISTRY
Friedman D, Du C, Agarwal Y, Varosy P, Masoudi F, Curtis J, Freeman J. B-PO03-155 OUTCOMES OF LEFT ATRIAL APPENDAGE OCCLUSION WITH WATCHMAN IN CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL PRACTICE COMPARED WITH CLINICAL TRIALS: A POOLED ANALYSIS OF PROTECT-AF, PREVAIL, AND THE NCDR LAAO REGISTRY. Heart Rhythm 2021, 18: s252. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.06.628.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2010
Cost-effectiveness of dabigatran compared with warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.
Freeman JV, Zhu RP, Owens DK, Garber AM, Hutton DW, Go AS, Wang PJ, Turakhia MP. Cost-effectiveness of dabigatran compared with warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Annals Of Internal Medicine 2010, 154: 1-11. PMID: 21041570, DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-1-201101040-00289.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAged, 80 and overAnticoagulantsAtrial FibrillationBenzimidazolesBeta-AlanineCost-Benefit AnalysisDabigatranFibrinolytic AgentsHemorrhageHumansIntracranial HemorrhagesIschemic Attack, TransientMarkov ChainsMyocardial InfarctionQuality-Adjusted Life YearsRisk FactorsSensitivity and SpecificityStrokeWarfarinConceptsHigh-dose dabigatranIncremental cost-effectiveness ratioNonvalvular atrial fibrillationLow-dose dabigatranCost-effectiveness ratioAtrial fibrillationIschemic strokeCost of dabigatranIntracranial hemorrhageClinical trialsOral direct thrombin inhibitorVeterans Affairs Health Services ResearchSingle randomized clinical trialAdjusted-dose warfarinStudies of anticoagulationPatients 65 yearsRE-LY trialDirect thrombin inhibitorRandomized clinical trialsAmerican Heart AssociationQuality-adjusted life expectancyQuality-adjusted survivalBase-case analysisHealth services researchStroke prevention