2023
Clinical trial data sharing: a cross-sectional study of outcomes associated with two U.S. National Institutes of Health models
Rowhani-Farid A, Grewal M, Solar S, Eghrari A, Zhang A, Gross C, Krumholz H, Ross J. Clinical trial data sharing: a cross-sectional study of outcomes associated with two U.S. National Institutes of Health models. Scientific Data 2023, 10: 529. PMID: 37553403, PMCID: PMC10409750, DOI: 10.1038/s41597-023-02436-0.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2018
Age of Data at the Time of Publication of Contemporary Clinical Trials
Welsh J, Lu Y, Dhruva SS, Bikdeli B, Desai NR, Benchetrit L, Zimmerman CO, Mu L, Ross JS, Krumholz HM. Age of Data at the Time of Publication of Contemporary Clinical Trials. JAMA Network Open 2018, 1: e181065-e181065. PMID: 30646100, PMCID: PMC6324269, DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1065.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsClinical trialsFinal data collectionParticipant enrollmentInternal medicineMultivariable linear regression analysisFirst participant enrollmentPrimary end pointMultivariable regression analysisContemporary clinical trialsClinical trial dataJAMA Internal MedicineRegression analysisCross-sectional analysisTime of publicationMedian timeTrial characteristicsOutcome measuresMAIN OUTCOMENew England JournalClinical practiceLinear regression analysisTrial dataEnd pointTrial resultsTrialsAccurate estimation of cardiovascular risk in a non-diabetic adult: detecting and correcting the error in the reported Framingham Risk Score for the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial population
Warner F, Dhruva SS, Ross JS, Dey P, Murugiah K, Krumholz HM. Accurate estimation of cardiovascular risk in a non-diabetic adult: detecting and correcting the error in the reported Framingham Risk Score for the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial population. BMJ Open 2018, 8: e021685. PMID: 30037874, PMCID: PMC6059296, DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021685.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSystolic Blood Pressure Intervention TrialFramingham risk scoreCardiovascular riskRisk scoreStudy populationStudy participantsNon-diabetic adultsTotal study populationHigh-risk populationClinical trial dataClinical trial sitesTrial populationIntervention trialsRisk populationsNew England JournalIndependent investigatorsTrial dataSecondary analysisSPRINT trialSPRINT dataTrialsRiskScoresParticipantsPopulation
2016
Availability of Clinical Trial Data From Industry‐Sponsored Cardiovascular Trials
Murugiah K, Ritchie JD, Desai NR, Ross JS, Krumholz HM. Availability of Clinical Trial Data From Industry‐Sponsored Cardiovascular Trials. Journal Of The American Heart Association 2016, 5: e003307. PMID: 27098969, PMCID: PMC4859296, DOI: 10.1161/jaha.116.003307.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsIndividual participant-level dataLarge cardiovascular trialsCardiovascular trialsParticipant-level dataClinical trial dataPharmaceutical companiesMajor pharmaceutical companiesIndustry-sponsored clinical trialsInterventional trialsAvailable trialsClinical trialsTrial dataTrialsPatientsSpecific reasons
2013
Implications of clinical trial data sharing for medical writers
Ross J, Krumholz H. Implications of clinical trial data sharing for medical writers. Medical Writing 2013, 22: 45-48. DOI: 10.1179/2047480612z.00000000085.Commentaries, Editorials and Letters
2012
Sharing of clinical trial data among trialists: a cross sectional survey
Rathi V, Dzara K, Gross CP, Hrynaszkiewicz I, Joffe S, Krumholz HM, Strait KM, Ross JS. Sharing of clinical trial data among trialists: a cross sectional survey. The BMJ 2012, 345: e7570. PMID: 23169870, PMCID: PMC3502744, DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e7570.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsClinical trial dataTrial dataGeneral medical journalsHigh-impact general medical journalsCross-sectional surveyDe-identified dataMedical journalsClinical trialsTrial fundersClinical trialistsSectional surveyTrialistsTrialsInvestigatorsExperiences of sharingPrevalence of dataPotential respondentsHigh impact factorAppropriate data usePrevalenceRespondents
2009
Pooled Analysis of Rofecoxib Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial Data: Lessons for Postmarket Pharmaceutical Safety Surveillance
Ross JS, Madigan D, Hill KP, Egilman DS, Wang Y, Krumholz HM. Pooled Analysis of Rofecoxib Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial Data: Lessons for Postmarket Pharmaceutical Safety Surveillance. JAMA Internal Medicine 2009, 169: 1976-1985. PMID: 19933959, PMCID: PMC2830805, DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.394.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsCardiovascular SystemCyclooxygenase 2 InhibitorsDrug IndustryHumansIncidenceLactonesMyocardial InfarctionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk AssessmentSafety-Based Drug WithdrawalsSulfonesTime FactorsUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationConceptsPlacebo-controlled trialVoluntary market withdrawalAdverse eventsCardiovascular riskThromboembolic adverse eventsMain outcome measurementsClinical trial dataRofecoxib groupOutcome measurementsTrial dataPlaceboTrial durationSafety surveillanceTrialsMarket withdrawalDeathRiskP-valueSurveillance effortsSubjectsWithdrawalRofecoxibYearsIncidenceDose
2005
The Impact of Clinical Trials on the Use of Hormone Replacement Therapy
Kim N, Gross C, Curtis J, Stettin G, Wogen S, Choe N, Krumholz HM. The Impact of Clinical Trials on the Use of Hormone Replacement Therapy. Journal Of General Internal Medicine 2005, 20: 1026-1031. PMID: 16307628, PMCID: PMC1490267, DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0221.x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAge DistributionAgedClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHormone Replacement TherapyHumansInformation DisseminationInsurance, Pharmaceutical ServicesLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePractice Patterns, Physicians'Retrospective StudiesTreatment RefusalUnited StatesConceptsWomen's Health InitiativeHormone replacement therapyHRT useHRT discontinuationReplacement therapyHealth initiativesHormone replacement therapy useLocal practice patternsHRT prescriptionHRT usersMarked regional variationPrescription fillingTherapy useClinical behaviorClinical trialsPractice patternsSubstantial geographic variationTrial publicationsDiscontinuationHealth databasesTrial dataAge groupsRapid effectsWest South CentralTrial results