2017
Protocol for a nationwide survey of primary health care in China: the China PEACE (Patient-centered Evaluative Assessment of Cardiac Events) MPP (Million Persons Project) Primary Health Care Survey
Su M, Zhang Q, Lu J, Li X, Tian N, Wang Y, Yip W, Cheng KK, Mensah GA, Horwitz RI, Mossialos E, Krumholz HM, Jiang L. Protocol for a nationwide survey of primary health care in China: the China PEACE (Patient-centered Evaluative Assessment of Cardiac Events) MPP (Million Persons Project) Primary Health Care Survey. BMJ Open 2017, 7: e016195. PMID: 28851781, PMCID: PMC5629739, DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016195.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPrimary health careMillion Persons ProjectQuality of careCardiac Events Million Persons ProjectHealth carePrimary care servicesEssential medicines programmeHealth Care SurveyChina PatientCare SurveyPatient satisfactionPHC servicesPHC workforceCardiovascular diseaseCare servicesObservational designPHC institutionsCentral Ethics CommitteeInformed consentChina National CenterEthics CommitteeCarePerson interviewsMedicine programsNationwide survey
2007
Patient Satisfaction With Treatment After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Role of Psychosocial Factors
Barry LC, Lichtman JH, Spertus JA, Rumsfeld JS, Vaccarino V, Jones PG, Plomondon ME, Parashar S, Krumholz HM. Patient Satisfaction With Treatment After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Role of Psychosocial Factors. Psychosomatic Medicine 2007, 69: 115-123. PMID: 17289828, DOI: 10.1097/psy.0b013e31802f2785.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAcute myocardial infarctionTreatment satisfactionMyocardial infarctionPsychosocial variablesPsychosocial statusWorse treatment satisfactionSeattle Angina QuestionnairePatient treatment satisfactionProspective cohort studyTreatment Satisfaction ScaleSocial supportDispositional optimismAngina QuestionnaireCohort studyHospital dischargeAMI patientsClinical presentationMean ageMedical historyPatient satisfactionCare indicatorsDepression severityPsychosocial factorsPsychosocial interventionsStudy participants
2005
A Randomized Outpatient Trial of a Decision-Support Information Technology Tool
Apkon M, Mattera JA, Lin Z, Herrin J, Bradley EH, Carbone M, Holmboe ES, Gross CP, Selter JG, Rich AS, Krumholz HM. A Randomized Outpatient Trial of a Decision-Support Information Technology Tool. JAMA Internal Medicine 2005, 165: 2388-2394. PMID: 16287768, DOI: 10.1001/archinte.165.20.2388.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAmbulatory CareAttitude of Health PersonnelCost-Benefit AnalysisDecision Support Systems, ClinicalFemaleFloridaHealth ResourcesHospitals, MilitaryHumansKentuckyMaleMass ScreeningMultivariate AnalysisOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePatient SatisfactionPreventive MedicineQuality of Health CareConceptsProvider satisfactionAmbulatory clinic visitsUsual care patientsDays of enrollmentQuality process measuresQuality of careProportion of opportunitiesUsual careClinic visitsOutpatient trialSecondary outcomesPrimary outcomeAcute carePatient satisfactionIntervention groupHealth care opportunitiesPatientsClinical decisionCare opportunitiesPharmacy resourcesPreventive measuresProcess measuresCareMedical resourcesModest improvement
2001
Can Practice Guidelines Be Transported Effectively to Different Settings? Results from a Multicenter Interventional Study
Lichtman J, Roumanis S, Radford M, Riedinger M, Weingarten S, Krumholz H. Can Practice Guidelines Be Transported Effectively to Different Settings? Results from a Multicenter Interventional Study. The Joint Commission Journal On Quality And Patient Safety 2001, 27: 42-53. PMID: 11147239, DOI: 10.1016/s1070-3241(01)27005-9.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedChest PainConnecticutFollow-Up StudiesHealth Care SurveysHospitalizationHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNebraskaNorth CarolinaOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient DischargePatient SatisfactionPennsylvaniaPractice Guidelines as TopicProspective StudiesSouth CarolinaSurveys and QuestionnairesConceptsChest painClinical guidelinesIntervention periodGuideline adherenceGuideline implementationPatient outcomesLow-risk chest pain patientsLow-risk chest painStandardized protocolMulticenter interventional studyLow-risk patientsChest pain patientsInterventional trialsPain patientsSuccessful translationClinical outcomesGuideline periodInterventional studyPatient satisfactionPatient's physicianPractice guidelinesHospital settingBaseline valuesClinical practicePain