2020
Phase 2 study of buparlisib (BKM120), a pan-class I PI3K inhibitor, in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer
Garrido-Castro AC, Saura C, Barroso-Sousa R, Guo H, Ciruelos E, Bermejo B, Gavilá J, Serra V, Prat A, Paré L, Céliz P, Villagrasa P, Li Y, Savoie J, Xu Z, Arteaga CL, Krop IE, Solit DB, Mills GB, Cantley LC, Winer EP, Lin NU, Rodon J. Phase 2 study of buparlisib (BKM120), a pan-class I PI3K inhibitor, in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research 2020, 22: 120. PMID: 33138866, PMCID: PMC7607628, DOI: 10.1186/s13058-020-01354-y.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAminopyridinesAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesDisease ProgressionFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMiddle AgedMorpholinesNeoplasm MetastasisPatient SafetyProtein Kinase InhibitorsProteomicsResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsConceptsTriple-negative breast cancerProgression-free survivalPan-class I PI3K inhibitorMetastatic triple-negative breast cancerStable diseasePhase 2 studyBreast cancerOverall survivalPI3K inhibitorsPI3K pathwayPartial responseComplete responseClinical benefitSingle-arm phase 2 studyTriple-negative metastatic breast cancerMedian progression-free survivalK inhibitorsClinical benefit rateEfficacy of buparlisibK pathwayFrequent adverse eventsMedian overall survivalPercent of patientsMetastatic breast cancerSubset of patients
2013
High performance teamwork training and systems redesign in outpatient oncology
Bunnell CA, Gross AH, Weingart SN, Kalfin MJ, Partridge A, Lane S, Burstein HJ, Fine B, Hilton NA, Sullivan C, Hagemeister EE, Kelly AE, Colicchio L, Szabatura AH, Winer EP, Salisbury M, Mann S. High performance teamwork training and systems redesign in outpatient oncology. BMJ Quality & Safety 2013, 22: 405. PMID: 23349386, DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000948.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsBreast cancer programCoordination of carePatient satisfaction scoresComprehensive cancer centerDays of treatmentSafety of careOncology careCancer CenterCare coordinationCancer programsInfusion nursesPatients' perceptionsOutpatient oncologyTreatment daysMost cliniciansPhysician appointmentsAmbulatory settingInsufficient statistical powerPatient issuesSatisfaction scoresClinic observationsHigh-risk areasTeam member rolesCareTrainer model