2021
Genomic features of rapid versus late relapse in triple negative breast cancer
Zhang Y, Asad S, Weber Z, Tallman D, Nock W, Wyse M, Bey JF, Dean KL, Adams EJ, Stockard S, Singh J, Winer EP, Lin NU, Jiang YZ, Ma D, Wang P, Shi L, Huang W, Shao ZM, Cherian M, Lustberg MB, Ramaswamy B, Sardesai S, VanDeusen J, Williams N, Wesolowski R, Obeng-Gyasi S, Sizemore GM, Sizemore ST, Verschraegen C, Stover DG. Genomic features of rapid versus late relapse in triple negative breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2021, 21: 568. PMID: 34006255, PMCID: PMC8130400, DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08320-7.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultBiomarkers, TumorChemotherapy, AdjuvantDatasets as TopicDisease-Free SurvivalDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansLogistic ModelsMastectomyMiddle AgedModels, GeneticMutationNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisRisk AssessmentTime FactorsTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsConceptsLate relapseRapid relapseImmune signaturesBreast cancerAnti-tumor CD8 T cellsBackgroundTriple-negative breast cancerTriple-negative breast cancerCD8 T cellsTumor mutation burdenIndependent validation cohortNegative breast cancerFisher's exact testPearson's chi-squared testChi-squared testLogistic regression modelsLuminal signaturePrimary TNBCTNBC subsetImmune subsetsClinical featuresValidation cohortWhole-genome copy numberPrimary tumorM1 macrophagesT cells
2017
Survival benefit needed to undergo chemotherapy: Patient and physician preferences
Vaz‐Luis I, O'Neill A, Sepucha K, Miller KD, Baker E, Dang CT, Northfelt DW, Winer EP, Sledge GW, Schneider B, Partridge AH. Survival benefit needed to undergo chemotherapy: Patient and physician preferences. Cancer 2017, 123: 2821-2828. PMID: 28323331, PMCID: PMC5517352, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30671.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAttitude of Health PersonnelAttitude to HealthBevacizumabBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinFemaleHumansMastectomyMastectomy, SegmentalMiddle AgedPaclitaxelPatient PreferencePhysiciansQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk AssessmentSurveys and QuestionnairesSurvival RateTumor BurdenConceptsMonths of chemotherapyModest survival benefitSurvival benefitAdjuvant chemotherapyEarly-stage breast cancerContemporary adjuvant chemotherapyPhase 3 trialBreast cancer patientsStage breast cancerQuality of lifeMonths of benefitsAdjuvant cyclophosphamideAdjuvant doxorubicinChemotherapy regimenMost patientsUndergoing ChemotherapyCancer patientsPatient preferencesBreast cancerModest benefitOld regimenChemotherapyPatientsPhysician's choiceSerial surveys
2016
Cardiac Outcomes of Patients Receiving Adjuvant Weekly Paclitaxel and Trastuzumab for Node-Negative, ERBB2-Positive Breast Cancer
Dang C, Guo H, Najita J, Yardley D, Marcom K, Albain K, Rugo H, Miller K, Ellis M, Shapira I, Wolff AC, Carey LA, Moy B, Groarke J, Moslehi J, Krop I, Burstein HJ, Hudis C, Winer EP, Tolaney SM. Cardiac Outcomes of Patients Receiving Adjuvant Weekly Paclitaxel and Trastuzumab for Node-Negative, ERBB2-Positive Breast Cancer. JAMA Oncology 2016, 2: 1-8. PMID: 26539793, PMCID: PMC5654518, DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.3709.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPaclitaxelReceptor, ErbB-2Risk AssessmentRisk FactorsStroke VolumeTime FactorsTrastuzumabTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesVentricular Dysfunction, LeftVentricular Function, LeftYoung AdultConceptsErbB2-positive breast cancerAsymptomatic LVEF declineCardiac toxic effectsLVEF declineBreast cancerPatients LVEFGrade 3Early-stage human epidermal growth factor receptor 2Asymptomatic left ventricular ejection fraction declineLeft ventricular ejection fraction declineVentricular ejection fraction declineHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2Epidermal growth factor receptor 2Adjuvant weekly paclitaxelCardiac safety dataEjection fraction declineMedian patient ageVentricular systolic dysfunctionTrastuzumab-based treatmentWeeks of chemotherapyGrowth factor receptor 2Positive breast cancerLife-saving therapyFactor receptor 2Single-group study
2014
Combination cediranib and olaparib versus olaparib alone for women with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: a randomised phase 2 study
Liu JF, Barry WT, Birrer M, Lee JM, Buckanovich RJ, Fleming GF, Rimel B, Buss MK, Nattam S, Hurteau J, Luo W, Quy P, Whalen C, Obermayer L, Lee H, Winer EP, Kohn EC, Ivy SP, Matulonis UA. Combination cediranib and olaparib versus olaparib alone for women with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: a randomised phase 2 study. The Lancet Oncology 2014, 15: 1207-1214. PMID: 25218906, PMCID: PMC4294183, DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(14)70391-2.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialCisplatinConfidence IntervalsDisease-Free SurvivalDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialOvarian NeoplasmsPhthalazinesPiperazinesQuinazolinesRisk AssessmentSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeConceptsProgression-free survivalRecurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancerPlatinum-sensitive ovarian cancerPhase 2 studyOvarian cancerOlaparib monotherapyMedian progression-free survivalGermline BRCA statusPhase 2 dosePrimary peritoneal cancerRecurrent ovarian cancerPhase 2 trialPhase 3 trialSide effect profilePhase 1 trialUS academic medical centersPatient-reported outcomesEndometrioid ovarian cancerGermline BRCA1/2 mutationsAnti-angiogenic therapyAnti-angiogenic agentsCombination of olaparibAcademic medical centerNational Cancer InstituteVEGF receptor 1
2013
Long‐Term Risk Perceptions of Women With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
Ruddy KJ, Meyer ME, Giobbie‐Hurder A, Emmons KM, Weeks JC, Winer EP, Partridge AH. Long‐Term Risk Perceptions of Women With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ. The Oncologist 2013, 18: 362-368. PMID: 23568001, PMCID: PMC3639521, DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0376.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsInvasive breast cancerBreast cancerDuctal carcinomaLifetime riskFuture breast cancer eventsHistory of DCISBreast cancer eventsTime of diagnosisLong-term followLongitudinal cohort studyFuture breast cancerWorse financial statusCohort studyMedian timeCancer eventsDCISOnly predictorModerate riskMultivariate modelCancerWomenDiagnosisRisk perceptionCarcinomaRecurrenceHigh performance teamwork training and systems redesign in outpatient oncology
Bunnell CA, Gross AH, Weingart SN, Kalfin MJ, Partridge A, Lane S, Burstein HJ, Fine B, Hilton NA, Sullivan C, Hagemeister EE, Kelly AE, Colicchio L, Szabatura AH, Winer EP, Salisbury M, Mann S. High performance teamwork training and systems redesign in outpatient oncology. BMJ Quality & Safety 2013, 22: 405. PMID: 23349386, DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000948.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsBreast cancer programCoordination of carePatient satisfaction scoresComprehensive cancer centerDays of treatmentSafety of careOncology careCancer CenterCare coordinationCancer programsInfusion nursesPatients' perceptionsOutpatient oncologyTreatment daysMost cliniciansPhysician appointmentsAmbulatory settingInsufficient statistical powerPatient issuesSatisfaction scoresClinic observationsHigh-risk areasTeam member rolesCareTrainer model
2011
Adjuvant chemotherapy in luminal breast cancers
Lim E, Winer EP. Adjuvant chemotherapy in luminal breast cancers. The Breast 2011, 20: s128-s131. PMID: 22015279, DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9776(11)70309-5.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBiomarkersBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNeoplasms, Hormone-DependentPrognosisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReceptor, ErbB-2Receptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneRisk AssessmentSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeConceptsAdjuvant endocrine therapyLuminal breast cancerEndocrine therapyBreast cancerEstrogen receptorAdjuvant chemotherapyProgesterone receptorHER2-negative breast cancerER-positive breast tumorsAddition of chemotherapyER-positive diseaseER-positive tumorsUse of chemotherapySubset of patientsSubgroup of patientsER-negative tumorsAdditional therapyCytotoxic chemotherapyEndocrine sensitivityClinicians' estimationTherapeutic responseFavorable outcomeCurrent biomarkersChemotherapyBreast tumorsQuality of Life of Older Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Companion Study to Cancer and Leukemia Group B 49907
Kornblith AB, Lan L, Archer L, Partridge A, Kimmick G, Hudis C, Winer E, Casey R, Bennett S, Cohen HJ, Muss HB. Quality of Life of Older Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Companion Study to Cancer and Leukemia Group B 49907. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2011, 29: 1022-1028. PMID: 21300923, PMCID: PMC3068052, DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.29.9859.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAge FactorsAgedAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsCapecitabineChemotherapy, AdjuvantCyclophosphamideDeoxycytidineDisease-Free SurvivalDoxorubicinFemaleFluorouracilHumansMethotrexateNeoplasm StagingQuality of LifeRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesSurvival AnalysisTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesConceptsEarly-stage breast cancerSystemic adverse effectsStandard chemotherapyBreast cancerCapecitabine treatmentOlder patientsOverall survivalStandard treatmentBetter QOLAdverse effectsHand-foot syndromePhase III trialsLife Questionnaire C30Completion of treatmentQuality of lifeAdjuvant chemotherapyLife substudyIII trialsCancer QualityImproved survivalLess nauseaGood appetiteHospital AnxietyDepression ScaleMonths postbaseline
2010
Cardiac Toxicity From Systemic Cancer Therapy: A Comprehensive Review
Curigliano G, Mayer EL, Burstein HJ, Winer EP, Goldhirsch A. Cardiac Toxicity From Systemic Cancer Therapy: A Comprehensive Review. Progress In Cardiovascular Diseases 2010, 53: 94-104. PMID: 20728696, DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2010.05.006.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCardiac adverse effectsCardiac toxicityCardiovascular toxicityNew drug developmentLeft ventricular ejection fraction declineVentricular ejection fraction declineAdverse effectsClassic chemotherapy agentsEjection fraction declinePotential cardiovascular toxicityRare serious complicationsNovel biologic agentsSignificant cardiac dysfunctionAcute coronary syndromeCongestive heart failureLong-term complicationsTypes of malignanciesSystemic cancer therapyLife-threatening eventsCancer therapyTyrosine kinase inhibitorsDrug developmentCardiovascular safetyCoronary syndromeBiologic agentsAdherence and Persistence With Oral Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Older Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer in CALGB 49907: Adherence Companion Study 60104
Partridge AH, Archer L, Kornblith AB, Gralow J, Grenier D, Perez E, Wolff AC, Wang X, Kastrissios H, Berry D, Hudis C, Winer E, Muss H. Adherence and Persistence With Oral Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Older Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer in CALGB 49907: Adherence Companion Study 60104. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2010, 28: 2418-2422. PMID: 20368559, PMCID: PMC2881723, DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.26.4671.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdministration, OralAge FactorsAgedAged, 80 and overAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticBreast NeoplasmsCanadaCapecitabineChemotherapy, AdjuvantDeoxycytidineDrug Administration ScheduleDrug MonitoringFemaleFluorouracilHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLinear ModelsLogistic ModelsMastectomyMedication AdherenceMicro-Electrical-Mechanical SystemsNeoplasm StagingRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesConceptsEarly-stage breast cancerBreast cancerCALGB 49907Oral chemotherapyClinical trialsOlder womenPatients age 65 yearsOral adjuvant chemotherapyPill bottle openingsNode-negative diseaseHormone receptor statusRelapse-free survivalRandomized clinical trialsAge 65 yearsMulticenter clinical trialNumber of dosesPercent of participantsLogistic regression modelsAdjuvant chemotherapyProtocol therapyOral therapyStandard chemotherapyMedian ageReceptor statusPatient adherence
2009
Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial
Albain KS, Barlow WE, Shak S, Hortobagyi GN, Livingston RB, Yeh IT, Ravdin P, Bugarini R, Baehner FL, Davidson NE, Sledge GW, Winer EP, Hudis C, Ingle JN, Perez EA, Pritchard KI, Shepherd L, Gralow JR, Yoshizawa C, Allred DC, Osborne CK, Hayes DF, America F. Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial. The Lancet Oncology 2009, 11: 55-65. PMID: 20005174, PMCID: PMC3058239, DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(09)70314-6.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicCyclophosphamideDisease-Free SurvivalDoxorubicinFemaleFluorouracilGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenetic TestingHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLymphatic MetastasisMiddle AgedPatient SelectionPostmenopausePredictive Value of TestsProportional Hazards ModelsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReceptors, EstrogenRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRisk AssessmentTamoxifenTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesConceptsLow recurrence scorePositive breast cancerAnthracycline-based chemotherapyDisease-free survivalHigh recurrence scoreRecurrence scorePositive nodesBreast cancerPostmenopausal womenRetrospective analysisNode-positive breast cancerTamoxifen-alone groupTamoxifen-treated patientsPhase 3 trialNational Cancer InstituteEffect of recurrenceOverall survivalSpecific survivalSurvival benefitCox regressionHigh riskTreatment groupsCancer InstituteChemotherapyPredictive value
2008
Risk Perceptions and Psychosocial Outcomes of Women With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Longitudinal Results From a Cohort Study
Partridge A, Adloff K, Blood E, Dees EC, Kaelin C, Golshan M, Ligibel J, de Moor JS, Weeks J, Emmons K, Winer E. Risk Perceptions and Psychosocial Outcomes of Women With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Longitudinal Results From a Cohort Study. Journal Of The National Cancer Institute 2008, 100: 243-251. PMID: 18270338, DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djn010.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnxietyBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingCohort StudiesDepressionFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMammographyMass ScreeningMassachusettsMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOdds RatioPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisQuality of LifeRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsConceptsLocal recurrence rateRecurrence ratePsychosocial outcomesDuctal carcinomaModerate riskCancer-related risksFavorable overall prognosisSystemic recurrence ratesBreast-conserving treatmentBreast cancer riskDCIS diagnosisCohort studyDCIS recurrenceOverall prognosisDisease recurrenceInvasive cancerDCISCancer riskPsychosocial concernsHealth behaviorsEnrollment surveySubstantial anxietyWomenInaccurate perceptionsModerate likelihood
2006
NCCN Task Force Report: Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer.
Carlson RW, Brown E, Burstein HJ, Gradishar WJ, Hudis CA, Loprinzi C, Mamounas EP, Perez EA, Pritchard K, Ravdin P, Recht A, Somlo G, Theriault RL, Winer EP, Wolff AC, _ _. NCCN Task Force Report: Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer. Journal Of The National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2006, 4 Suppl 1: s1-26. PMID: 16507275, DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2006.2001.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNational Comprehensive Cancer NetworkBreast cancer treatment guidelinesCancer treatment guidelinesAdjuvant therapyBreast cancerTreatment guidelinesAdjuvant therapy recommendationsQuantitative estrogen receptorComprehensive Cancer NetworkEstrogen receptor levelsPositive breast cancerEndocrine therapyPostmenopausal womenMenopausal statusTask ForcePredictive factorsGuideline panelHER2 statusBiologic markersAromatase inhibitorsTherapy recommendationsReceptor levelsEstrogen receptorHER2/Cancer Network
2005
Fertility After Breast Cancer: Questions Abound
Partridge AH, Winer EP. Fertility After Breast Cancer: Questions Abound. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2005, 23: 4259-4261. PMID: 15824413, DOI: 10.1200/jco.2005.12.914.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAdjuvant Chemotherapy in Older and Younger Women With Lymph Node–Positive Breast Cancer
Muss HB, Woolf S, Berry D, Cirrincione C, Weiss RB, Budman D, Wood WC, Henderson IC, Hudis C, Winer E, Cohen H, Wheeler J, Norton L, B F. Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Older and Younger Women With Lymph Node–Positive Breast Cancer. JAMA 2005, 293: 1073-1081. PMID: 15741529, DOI: 10.1001/jama.293.9.1073.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLymph node-positive breast cancerNode-positive breast cancerTreatment-related mortalityDisease-free survivalAdjuvant chemotherapyBreast cancerOverall survivalOlder womenMore chemotherapyOlder patientsHigh treatment-related mortalityAge groupsYoung womenPositive lymph nodesHealthy older patientsDuration of chemotherapyGood general healthSmaller tumor sizeBreast cancer mortalityBreast cancer patientsCommunity medical centerDifferent age groupsTamoxifen useLymph nodesRetrospective review
2004
Long-Term Complications of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Early Stage Breast Cancer
Partridge AH, Winer EP. Long-Term Complications of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Early Stage Breast Cancer. Breast Disease 2004, 21: 55-64. PMID: 15687723, DOI: 10.3233/bd-2004-21108.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsCardiovascular DiseasesChemotherapy, AdjuvantCognition DisordersDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansMastectomy, SegmentalMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesPrognosisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk AssessmentSurvival AnalysisTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeConceptsLong-term complicationsEarly-stage breast cancerAdjuvant chemotherapyStage breast cancerBreast cancerSide effectsRare long-term complicationAcute side effectsLong-term riskTerm complicationsSpecific complicationsRisk factorsIncidence rateLong-term effectsChemotherapyComplicationsLate onsetSustained impactCancerReview detailsPotential riskRiskPatientsEtiologyTherapy
2002
American Society of Clinical Oncology technology assessment of pharmacologic interventions for breast cancer risk reduction including tamoxifen, raloxifene, and aromatase inhibition.
Chlebowski RT, Col N, Winer EP, Collyar DE, Cummings SR, Vogel VG, Burstein HJ, Eisen A, Lipkus I, Pfister DG. American Society of Clinical Oncology technology assessment of pharmacologic interventions for breast cancer risk reduction including tamoxifen, raloxifene, and aromatase inhibition. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2002, 20: 3328-43. PMID: 12149307, DOI: 10.1200/jco.2002.06.029.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsBreast cancer risk reductionUse of tamoxifenCancer risk reductionBreast cancer riskCancer riskASCO Health Services Research CommitteeBreast cancer risk reduction strategiesAromatase inhibitionCancer risk reduction strategiesClinical Oncology technology assessmentEvidence-based technology assessmentsHealth Services Research CommitteeBreast cancer-specific survivalHigher breast cancer riskUse of raloxifeneCancer-specific survivalHormone replacement therapyBreast cancer incidenceHealth benefitsGreater clinical benefitOverall health benefitsAmerican SocietyOutcomes of interestNet health benefitRisk reduction
1999
Attitudes, knowledge, and risk perceptions of women with breast and/or ovarian cancer considering testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2.
Bluman L, Rimer B, Berry D, Borstelmann N, Iglehart J, Regan K, Schildkraut J, Winer E. Attitudes, knowledge, and risk perceptions of women with breast and/or ovarian cancer considering testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 1999, 17: 1040-6. PMID: 10071299, DOI: 10.1200/jco.1999.17.3.1040.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsOvarian cancerBRCA2 mutationsHigh-risk womenPercent of womenBaseline questionnairePhysician referralCancer riskChallenges cliniciansGenetic testingKnowledge deficitsWomenCancerGene mutationsBreastBRCA2PatientsBaseline knowledgeRiskBRCA1Cancer geneticsTrialsRisk perceptionHigher proportionMutationsPerception of risk
1998
Testing for the BRCA1 and BRCA2 Breast-Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility Genes
Tengs TO, Winer EP, Paddock S, Aguilar-Chavez O, Berry DA. Testing for the BRCA1 and BRCA2 Breast-Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility Genes. Medical Decision Making 1998, 18: 365-375. PMID: 10372578, DOI: 10.1177/0272989x9801800402.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsDecision Support TechniquesFemaleGenes, BRCA1Genes, Tumor SuppressorGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHumansIncidenceMarkov ChainsMastectomyMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsOvariectomyPredictive Value of TestsQuality-Adjusted Life YearsRisk AssessmentSurvival AnalysisUnited StatesInformed Consent for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Testing
Rimer B, Sugarman J, Winer E, Bluman L, Lerman C. Informed Consent for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Testing. Breast Disease 1998, 10: 99-114. PMID: 15687553, DOI: 10.3233/bd-1998-101-212.Peer-Reviewed Original Research