2019
Evaluating the addition of bevacizumab to endocrine therapy as first-line treatment for hormone receptor–positive metastatic breast cancer: a pooled analysis from the LEA (GEICAM/2006-11_GBG51) and CALGB 40503 (Alliance) trials
Martín M, Loibl S, Hyslop T, De la Haba-Rodríguez J, Aktas B, Cirrincione CT, Mehta K, Barry WT, Morales S, Carey LA, Garcia-Saenz JA, Partridge A, Martinez-Jañez N, Hahn O, Winer E, Guerrero-Zotano A, Hudis C, Casas M, Rodriguez-Martin C, Furlanetto J, Carrasco E, Dickler MN, Group G, GBG, Oncology A. Evaluating the addition of bevacizumab to endocrine therapy as first-line treatment for hormone receptor–positive metastatic breast cancer: a pooled analysis from the LEA (GEICAM/2006-11_GBG51) and CALGB 40503 (Alliance) trials. European Journal Of Cancer 2019, 117: 91-98. PMID: 31276981, PMCID: PMC6718694, DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.06.002.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabBone NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsEvaluation Studies as TopicFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFulvestrantHumansLetrozoleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneSoft Tissue NeoplasmsSurvival RateTamoxifenConceptsProgression-free survivalClinical benefit rateObjective response rateEndocrine therapyMetastatic breast cancerOverall survivalGrade IIIBreast cancerHormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancerMedian progression-free survivalAddition of BevSignificant additional toxicityStandard endocrine therapyDe novo diseaseAddition of bevacizumabFirst-line treatmentPredictors of efficacyNovo diseaseRecurrent diseaseLiver eventsEndocrine sensitivityBenefit rateAdditional toxicityPatientsResponse rate
2017
Evaluating the addition of bevacizumab (Bev) to endocrine therapy as first-line treatment for hormone-receptor positive (HR+)/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC): Pooled-analysis from the LEA (GEICAM/2006-11_GBG51) and CALGB 40503 (Alliance) trials.
Martin M, Loibl S, Hyslop T, de la Haba-Rodriguez J, Aktas B, Cirrincione C, Carrasco E, Mehta K, Barry W, Morales S, Carey L, Garcia Saenz J, Partridge A, Martinez N, Hahn O, Winer E, Guerrero A, Hudis C, Casas M, Dickler M. Evaluating the addition of bevacizumab (Bev) to endocrine therapy as first-line treatment for hormone-receptor positive (HR+)/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC): Pooled-analysis from the LEA (GEICAM/2006-11_GBG51) and CALGB 40503 (Alliance) trials. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2017, 35: 1012-1012. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.1012.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchProgression-free survivalAdvanced breast cancerRandomized trialsMedian progression-free survivalNegative advanced breast cancerBreast Cancer Research FoundationAddition of BevMultivariable Cox modelAddition of bevacizumabFirst-line treatmentCancer Research FoundationCardiovascular eventsPgR statusSecondary endpointsLiver eventsRecurrent diseaseMedian ageMultivariable analysisTreatment armsPatient populationBreast cancerGrade 3Prolonged benefitCox modelStudy-level differences
2008
The impact of sharing results of a randomized breast cancer clinical trial with study participants
Partridge AH, Wolff AC, Marcom PK, Kaufman PA, Zhang L, Gelman R, Moore C, Lake D, Fleming GF, Rugo HS, Atkins J, Sampson E, Collyar D, Winer EP. The impact of sharing results of a randomized breast cancer clinical trial with study participants. Breast Cancer Research And Treatment 2008, 115: 123-129. PMID: 18543100, DOI: 10.1007/s10549-008-0057-7.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAnxietyChemotherapy, AdjuvantClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicCommunicationData CollectionHumansMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicPatient SatisfactionPerceptionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecurrenceRegression AnalysisResearch DesignTrastuzumabConceptsCancer clinical trialsClinical trialsStudy participantsBreast cancer clinical trialsCooperative group trialsSubset of womenResults One hundredClinical trial participantsPercent of participantsRecurrent diseasePatients' perceptionsGroup trialsTrial participantsFavorable responsePsychosocial supportLogistic regressionOne hundredTrialsPatientsTrastuzumabStudy resultsParticipantsTreatmentPreliminary study resultsAnxiety
2006
Estrogen-Receptor Status and Outcomes of Modern Chemotherapy for Patients With Node-Positive Breast Cancer
Berry D, Cirrincione C, Henderson I, Citron M, Budman D, Goldstein L, Martino S, Perez E, Muss H, Norton L, Hudis C, Winer E. Estrogen-Receptor Status and Outcomes of Modern Chemotherapy for Patients With Node-Positive Breast Cancer. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey 2006, 61: 584-585. DOI: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000234789.05150.7c.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchER-negative patientsER-positive patientsER-positive tumorsER-negative tumorsNode-positive breast cancerER-negative womenEstrogen receptor statusBreast cancerOverall survivalER statusLymph node-positive breast cancerER-positive breast cancerModern intensive chemotherapyWeak prognostic factorER-positive diseaseLeukemia Group BDisease-free survivalER-negative diseaseOverall survival ratePatterns of riskAdjuvant chemotherapyChemotherapy trialsEndocrine treatmentIntensive chemotherapyRecurrent diseaseStudy participants’ perceptions of the process and impact of receiving results of N9831
Partridge A, Wolff A, Marcom P, Kaufman P, Moore C, Lake D, Fleming G, Rugo H, Collyar D, Winer E. Study participants’ perceptions of the process and impact of receiving results of N9831. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2006, 24: 518-518. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.518.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchTrial participantsLarge cooperative group trialsPhase III trialsCooperative group trialsSubset of womenClinical trial participantsHealth care providersAdjuvant chemotherapyRecurrent diseaseIII trialsMultivariable analysisClinical trialsBreast cancerGroup trialsCare providersAverage ageFavorable responseClinical investigatorsPsychosocial supportPatientsWomenSubstantial proportionTrialsStudy resultsGreater satisfaction
1999
Quality of life in patients surviving at least 12 months following high dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow support
Winer E, Lindley C, Hardee M, Sawyer W, Brunatti C, Borstelmann N, Peters W. Quality of life in patients surviving at least 12 months following high dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow support. Psycho-Oncology 1999, 8: 167-176. PMID: 10335560, DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1611(199903/04)8:2<167::aid-pon354>3.0.co;2-s.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsFunctional Living Index-CancerHigh-dose chemotherapyQuality of lifeAutologous bone marrow supportBone marrow supportSymptom Distress ScaleDose chemotherapyBreast cancerMarrow supportSexual functioningMajority of patientsBreast cancer patientsLong-term outcomesTreatment of patientsMore yearsFLIC scoresTransplant supportIndex cancerRecurrent diseaseAssessment of qualityMedian timeCancer patientsSexual functionClinical trialsSevere symptoms