2022
Nodal Positivity in Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Implications for Preoperative Immunotherapy
Mittendorf EA, Kantor O, Weiss A, Richardson E, Garrido-Castro A, Portnow LH, Krop IE, Lin NU, Winer EP, Tolaney SM, King TA. Nodal Positivity in Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Implications for Preoperative Immunotherapy. Annals Of Surgical Oncology 2022, 30: 100-106. PMID: 35941343, DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12357-8.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTriple-negative breast cancerNational Cancer DatabaseNormal clinical examinationAxillary ultrasoundNegative clinical examinationClinical examinationUpfront surgeryCT2 tumorsInstitutional databaseBreast cancerEarly-stage triple-negative breast cancerStage triple-negative breast cancerAddition of immunotherapyNodal positivity ratePathologic nodal statusNode-positive patientsEvent-free survivalNode-positive diseaseRisk-benefit ratioCT1-2N0NCDB cohortPreoperative immunotherapyResultsFor patientsPositive nodesPreoperative chemotherapy
2021
Utility of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Node-Positive Breast Cancer.
Laws A, Garrido-Castro A, Poorvu P, Winer E, Mittendorf E, King T. Utility of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Node-Positive Breast Cancer. Oncology 2021, 35: 77-84. PMID: 33577165, DOI: 10.46883/onc.2021.3502.0077.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRecurrence scorePositive nodesClinical trialsBreast cancerHER2-negative breast cancerNode-positive breast cancerLarge population-based registryNode-positive populationAdjuvant chemotherapy useChemotherapy-treated patientsClinical practice guidelinesCurrent practice patternsPopulation-based registryMultiple clinical trialsPotential predictive valueADAPT trialAdjuvant chemotherapyChemotherapy useEndocrine therapyPostmenopausal patientsChemotherapy benefitExcellent outcomesPractice patternsPractice guidelinesRetrospective analysis
2014
Comparison of Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Versus Single-Agent Paclitaxel As Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer in Women With 0 to 3 Positive Axillary Nodes: CALGB 40101 (Alliance)
Shulman LN, Berry DA, Cirrincione CT, Becker HP, Perez EA, O'Regan R, Martino S, Shapiro CL, Schneider CJ, Kimmick G, Burstein HJ, Norton L, Muss H, Hudis CA, Winer EP. Comparison of Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Versus Single-Agent Paclitaxel As Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer in Women With 0 to 3 Positive Axillary Nodes: CALGB 40101 (Alliance). Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2014, 32: 2311-2317. PMID: 24934787, PMCID: PMC4105484, DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.53.7142.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRelapse-free survivalSingle-agent paclitaxelOverall survivalHazard ratioBreast cancerTreatment-related deathsCycles of therapyOperable breast cancerPositive axillary nodesPrimary end pointDuration of therapyOptimal adjuvant chemotherapyComparison of doxorubicinAdjuvant chemotherapyCALGB 40101Median followAdjuvant therapyHematologic toxicityPositive nodesAxillary nodesPatient deathBalance efficacyPatientsEnd pointTherapy
2013
Comparison of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) versus single-agent paclitaxel (T) as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer in women with 0-3 positive axillary nodes: CALGB 40101.
Shulman L, Berry D, Cirrincione C, Becker H, Perez E, O'Regan R, Martino S, Shapiro C, Atkins J, Schneider C, Kimmick G, Burstein H, Norton L, Muss H, Hudis C, Winer E. Comparison of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) versus single-agent paclitaxel (T) as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer in women with 0-3 positive axillary nodes: CALGB 40101. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2013, 31: 1007-1007. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.1007.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchRelapse-free survivalHazard ratioOverall survivalBreast cancerEarly-stage breast cancerCycles of therapyNon-hematologic toxicitiesOperable breast cancerPositive axillary nodesSingle-agent paclitaxelTreatment-related deathsOptimal adjuvant chemotherapyStage breast cancerConfidence intervalsComparison of doxorubicinAdjuvant chemotherapyCALGB 40101Hematologic toxicityAdjuvant therapyPositive nodesPrimary endpointAxillary nodesVs. 4Conclusion of equivalenceGrade 3
2012
Six Cycles of Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide or Paclitaxel Are Not Superior to Four Cycles As Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer in Women With Zero to Three Positive Axillary Nodes: Cancer and Leukemia Group B 40101
Shulman LN, Cirrincione CT, Berry DA, Becker HP, Perez EA, O'Regan R, Martino S, Atkins JN, Mayer E, Schneider CJ, Kimmick G, Norton L, Muss H, Winer EP, Hudis C. Six Cycles of Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide or Paclitaxel Are Not Superior to Four Cycles As Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer in Women With Zero to Three Positive Axillary Nodes: Cancer and Leukemia Group B 40101. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2012, 30: 4071-4076. PMID: 22826271, PMCID: PMC3494835, DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.40.6405.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRelapse-free survivalHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2Primary breast cancerPositive nodesBreast cancerHazard ratioAdjuvant chemotherapyChemotherapy regimenEstrogen receptor/progesterone receptorPrimary efficacy end pointEpidermal growth factor receptor 2Dose-dense fashionDoxorubicin/cyclophosphamideAdjusted hazard ratioCycles of doxorubicinEfficacy end pointOperable breast cancerPositive axillary nodesER/PgRGrowth factor receptor 2Factor receptor 2Chemotherapy regimensAxillary nodesMenopausal statusClinical outcomes
2009
Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial
Albain KS, Barlow WE, Shak S, Hortobagyi GN, Livingston RB, Yeh IT, Ravdin P, Bugarini R, Baehner FL, Davidson NE, Sledge GW, Winer EP, Hudis C, Ingle JN, Perez EA, Pritchard KI, Shepherd L, Gralow JR, Yoshizawa C, Allred DC, Osborne CK, Hayes DF, America F. Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial. The Lancet Oncology 2009, 11: 55-65. PMID: 20005174, PMCID: PMC3058239, DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(09)70314-6.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicCyclophosphamideDisease-Free SurvivalDoxorubicinFemaleFluorouracilGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenetic TestingHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLymphatic MetastasisMiddle AgedPatient SelectionPostmenopausePredictive Value of TestsProportional Hazards ModelsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReceptors, EstrogenRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRisk AssessmentTamoxifenTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesConceptsLow recurrence scorePositive breast cancerAnthracycline-based chemotherapyDisease-free survivalHigh recurrence scoreRecurrence scorePositive nodesBreast cancerPostmenopausal womenRetrospective analysisNode-positive breast cancerTamoxifen-alone groupTamoxifen-treated patientsPhase 3 trialNational Cancer InstituteEffect of recurrenceOverall survivalSpecific survivalSurvival benefitCox regressionHigh riskTreatment groupsCancer InstituteChemotherapyPredictive value