2020
TBCRC 048: Phase II Study of Olaparib for Metastatic Breast Cancer and Mutations in Homologous Recombination-Related Genes.
Tung NM, Robson ME, Ventz S, Santa-Maria CA, Nanda R, Marcom PK, Shah PD, Ballinger TJ, Yang ES, Vinayak S, Melisko M, Brufsky A, DeMeo M, Jenkins C, Domchek S, D'Andrea A, Lin NU, Hughes ME, Carey LA, Wagle N, Wulf GM, Krop IE, Wolff AC, Winer EP, Garber JE. TBCRC 048: Phase II Study of Olaparib for Metastatic Breast Cancer and Mutations in Homologous Recombination-Related Genes. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2020, 38: 4274-4282. PMID: 33119476, DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.02151.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMetastatic breast cancerObjective response rateProgression-free survivalPoly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitorsPhase II studyBreast cancerMutation carriersII studyMedian progression-free survivalNegative metastatic breast cancerHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2Epidermal growth factor receptor 2Clinical benefit rateHER2-negative diseasePlatinum-refractory diseaseGrowth factor receptor 2Population of patientsFactor receptor 2Homologous recombination-related genesConfirmed responsesEligible patientsMeasurable diseaseSecondary endpointsChemotherapy regimensPrimary endpoint
2015
Tailoring adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for patients with triple negative breast cancer
Stover DG, Winer EP. Tailoring adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for patients with triple negative breast cancer. The Breast 2015, 24: s132-s135. PMID: 26255198, DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.07.032.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTriple-negative breast cancerBreast cancerAdjuvant chemotherapyHigh-risk triple negative breast cancerLong-term outcome dataAnthracycline-taxane combinationsBRCA mutation carriersStandard of careNegative breast cancerPoor prognosis subtypeAdjuvant settingStandard regimensToxic regimensMetastatic settingCytotoxic chemotherapySystemic therapyImmune infiltratesTumor characteristicsMutation carriersOutcome dataWarrants further considerationStage ISpecific subgroupsChemotherapyCancerTBCRC009: A Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial of Platinum Monotherapy With Biomarker Assessment in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Isakoff SJ, Mayer EL, He L, Traina TA, Carey LA, Krag KJ, Rugo HS, Liu MC, Stearns V, Come SE, Timms KM, Hartman AR, Borger DR, Finkelstein DM, Garber JE, Ryan PD, Winer EP, Goss PE, Ellisen LW. TBCRC009: A Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial of Platinum Monotherapy With Biomarker Assessment in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2015, 33: 1902-1909. PMID: 25847936, PMCID: PMC4451173, DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.57.6660.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinCarboplatinCisplatinClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenomic InstabilityHeterozygoteHumansLoss of HeterozygosityMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasm StagingPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesTreatment OutcomeTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsConceptsMetastatic triple-negative breast cancerGermline BRCA1/2 mutationsPhase II clinical trialTriple-negative breast cancerBRCA1/2 mutationsResponse rateClinical trialsBreast cancerMulticenter phase II clinical trialEnd pointSingle-arm phase II clinical trialCoprimary end pointsExploratory end pointsObjective response ratePIK3CA mutation statusSingle-agent platinumLong-term respondersPlatinum-based chemotherapyIdentification of patientsBRCA1/2 mutation carriersGenomic instability signatureGene expression subtypesP73 gene expressionPlatinum monotherapyMutation carriers
2013
Perceptions, knowledge, and satisfaction with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among young women with breast cancer: a cross-sectional survey.
Rosenberg SM, Tracy MS, Meyer ME, Sepucha K, Gelber S, Hirshfield-Bartek J, Troyan S, Morrow M, Schapira L, Come SE, Winer EP, Partridge AH. Perceptions, knowledge, and satisfaction with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among young women with breast cancer: a cross-sectional survey. Annals Of Internal Medicine 2013, 159: 373-81. PMID: 24042365, PMCID: PMC3968260, DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-6-201309170-00003.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsContralateral prophylactic mastectomyContralateral breast cancerBreast cancerCross-sectional surveyYoung womenProphylactic mastectomyBilateral breast cancerBreast cancer worryAge 40 yearsCommunity medical centerBRCA2 mutation carriersSusan G. KomenBilateral mastectomyUnaffected breastCancer worryMedical CenterMutation carriersMost womenCancerEvidence-based decisionsMastectomyRecall biasWomenRiskActual risk
2011
P4-11-10: Perceptions, Knowledge and Satisfaction with Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy among Young Women with Breast Cancer.
Tracy M, Meyer M, Sepucha K, Gelber S, Hirshfield-Bartek J, Troyan S, Morrow M, Schapira L, Come S, Winer E, Partridge A. P4-11-10: Perceptions, Knowledge and Satisfaction with Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy among Young Women with Breast Cancer. Cancer Research 2011, 71: p4-11-10-p4-11-10. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs11-p4-11-10.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchContralateral prophylactic mastectomyContralateral breast cancerBreast cancerBilateral mastectomyYoung womenProphylactic mastectomyBenefits of CPMEarly breast cancerBilateral breast cancerSurgical treatment decisionsLongitudinal cohort studyBreast cancer treatmentPercent of womenCohort studyContralateral diseaseMedian ageProphylactic indicationsPatient preferencesTreatment decisionsMutation carriersAge 40MastectomyCancerCancer ResCancer treatment
2007
Could treatment with tamoxifen be superior to aromatase inhibitors in early-stage breast cancer after pharmacogenomic testing? A modeling analysis
Punglia R, Winer E, Weeks J, Burstein H. Could treatment with tamoxifen be superior to aromatase inhibitors in early-stage breast cancer after pharmacogenomic testing? A modeling analysis. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2007, 25: 502-502. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2007.25.18_suppl.502.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchDisease-free survivalOptimal treatment strategyAromatase inhibitorsHazard ratioUnselected womenTreatment strategiesBreast cancerEstrogen receptor-positive breast cancerWt/wt patientsReceptor-positive breast cancerEarly-stage breast cancerAnnual recurrence riskAdjuvant endocrine treatmentEfficacy of tamoxifenPercent of patientsActive tamoxifen metabolitesWT cohortsEndocrine treatmentBIG 1Initial treatmentTamoxifen metabolitesCancer recurrenceUnselected groupMutation carriersPharmacogenomic testing
2002
Pre-Counseling Education Materials for BRCA Testing: Does Tailoring Make a Difference?
Skinner CS, Schildkraut JM, Berry D, Calingaert B, Marcom PK, Sugarman J, Winer EP, Iglehart JD, Futreal PA, Rimer BK. Pre-Counseling Education Materials for BRCA Testing: Does Tailoring Make a Difference? Genetic Testing And Molecular Biomarkers 2002, 6: 93-105. PMID: 12215248, DOI: 10.1089/10906570260199348.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsGenetic testingOvarian cancer susceptibilityTumor RegistryMean ageOvarian cancer gene BRCA1Ovarian cancerFamily historyMutation carriersBRCA testingBaseline surveyCancer susceptibilityEstimation of riskBehavioral targetsPrint materialsGreater improvementBreastFollowup surveyEducation materialsWomenGenes BRCA1Decision aidRiskBRCA1