2022
Brain–phenotype models fail for individuals who defy sample stereotypes
Greene AS, Shen X, Noble S, Horien C, Hahn CA, Arora J, Tokoglu F, Spann MN, Carrión CI, Barron DS, Sanacora G, Srihari VH, Woods SW, Scheinost D, Constable RT. Brain–phenotype models fail for individuals who defy sample stereotypes. Nature 2022, 609: 109-118. PMID: 36002572, PMCID: PMC9433326, DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-05118-w.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsBrain-phenotype relationshipsBrain functional organizationCognitive constructsIndividual differencesNeurocognitive measuresBrain activityNeurocognitive scoresStereotypical profileNeural targetsClinical interventionsNeural circuitsFunctional organizationIndividualsSuch relationshipsData-driven approachRelationshipStereotypes
2018
Task-induced brain state manipulation improves prediction of individual traits
Greene AS, Gao S, Scheinost D, Constable RT. Task-induced brain state manipulation improves prediction of individual traits. Nature Communications 2018, 9: 2807. PMID: 30022026, PMCID: PMC6052101, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04920-3.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsBrain statesIndividual differencesBrain-behavior relationshipsFluid intelligence scoresTask-based functional connectivity analysisResting-state fMRI dataBrain functional organizationFunctional connectivity analysisCognitive tasksFluid intelligenceIntelligence scoresFunctional connectivityFMRI dataConnectivity analysisHuman behaviorIndividual traitsTaskCertain tasksFunctional organizationOutperform modelsSuch relationshipsCognitionState manipulationIntelligenceVariance