2001
Validation of the Gail et al. Model of Breast Cancer Risk Prediction and Implications for Chemoprevention
Rockhill B, Spiegelman D, Byrne C, Hunter D, Colditz G. Validation of the Gail et al. Model of Breast Cancer Risk Prediction and Implications for Chemoprevention. Journal Of The National Cancer Institute 2001, 93: 358-366. PMID: 11238697, DOI: 10.1093/jnci/93.5.358.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsInvasive breast cancerGail et alRisk factor strataBreast cancerDiscriminatory accuracyHealth StudyModest discriminatory accuracyNurses' Health StudySubset of womenBreast cancer casesBreast cancer risk predictionNet health benefitCancer risk predictionTamoxifen useCancer casesPrevention optionsConcordance statisticClinical counselingCancerYoung womenWhite womenRisk estimatesWomenHealth benefitsRisk prediction
1998
Correcting for bias in relative risk estimates due to exposure measurement error: a case study of occupational exposure to antineoplastics in pharmacists.
Spiegelman D, Valanis B. Correcting for bias in relative risk estimates due to exposure measurement error: a case study of occupational exposure to antineoplastics in pharmacists. American Journal Of Public Health 1998, 88: 406-12. PMID: 9518972, PMCID: PMC1508329, DOI: 10.2105/ajph.88.3.406.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMeasurement error modelInterval estimatesExposure measurement errorMeasurement errorError modelPrevalence ratiosRelative riskLikelihood-based methodsLog relative riskNondifferential measurement errorStatistical methodsRelative risk estimatesOutcomes of interestOccupational exposurePublic health researchHospital pharmacistsLogistic regressionRisk estimatesWeekly numberFirst methodHealth effectsUsual pointHealth researchErrorPharmacists
1992
Correction of Logistic Regression Relative Risk Estimates and Confidence Intervals for Random Within-Person Measurement Error
Rosner B, Spiegelman D, Willett WC. Correction of Logistic Regression Relative Risk Estimates and Confidence Intervals for Random Within-Person Measurement Error. American Journal Of Epidemiology 1992, 136: 1400-1413. PMID: 1488967, DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116453.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRelative risk estimatesRisk factorsLogistic regressionRisk estimatesCoronary risk factorsCoronary heart diseaseGold standardConfidence intervalsFramingham Heart StudyExamination 4Extreme quintilesHeart diseaseOdds ratioHeart StudyExamination 2Exposure assessmentSubstudyCovariatesMenMain studyReproducibility dataRegressionFactorsQuintileIncidence
1990
CORRECTION OF LOGISTIC REGRESSION RELATIVE RISK ESTIMATES AND CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR MEASUREMENT ERROR: THE CASE OF MULTIPLE COVARIATES MEASURED WITH ERROR
ROSNER B, SPIEGELMAN D, WILLETT WC. CORRECTION OF LOGISTIC REGRESSION RELATIVE RISK ESTIMATES AND CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR MEASUREMENT ERROR: THE CASE OF MULTIPLE COVARIATES MEASURED WITH ERROR. American Journal Of Epidemiology 1990, 132: 734-745. PMID: 2403114, DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115715.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAge-adjusted relative riskRelative riskRisk factorsFat intakeMultiple logistic regression modelBreast cancer riskConfidence intervalsTrue risk factorRelative risk estimatesValidation studyLogistic regression modelsMultivariate linear regression modelRegression modelsAlcohol intakeProspective studyDietary fatBreast cancerCancer riskLogistic regressionRisk estimatesIntakeRiskSeparate validation studyContinuous variablesPositive association