Comparison of intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, and conventional angiography‐guided percutaneous coronary interventions: A systematic review, network meta‐analysis, and meta‐regression
Park D, An S, Jolly N, Attanasio S, Yadav N, Gutierrez J, Nanna M, Rao S, Vij A. Comparison of intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, and conventional angiography‐guided percutaneous coronary interventions: A systematic review, network meta‐analysis, and meta‐regression. Catheterization And Cardiovascular Interventions 2023, 102: 440-450. PMID: 37483068, PMCID: PMC10908343, DOI: 10.1002/ccd.30784.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMajor adverse cardiovascular eventsPercutaneous coronary interventionOptical coherence tomographyCoronary angiographyIntravascular ultrasoundCoronary interventionCardiac deathClinical outcomesClinical efficacyConventional angiography-guided PCIAngiography-guided percutaneous coronary interventionCoherence tomographyUse of IVUSSuperiority of OCTAdverse cardiovascular eventsRandomized clinical trialsConventional coronary angiographyImaging modalitiesComparative clinical efficacyBest imaging modalityIntracoronary imaging modalityLesion revascularizationPCI guidanceCardiovascular eventsCause mortality