2020
Comparing programmed death ligand 1 scores for predicting pembrolizumab efficacy in head and neck cancer
Emancipator K, Huang L, Aurora-Garg D, Bal T, Cohen EEW, Harrington K, Soulières D, Le Tourneau C, Licitra L, Burtness B, Swaby R. Comparing programmed death ligand 1 scores for predicting pembrolizumab efficacy in head and neck cancer. Modern Pathology 2020, 34: 532-541. PMID: 33239737, DOI: 10.1038/s41379-020-00710-9.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorBiopsyClinical Decision-MakingClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicDecision Support TechniquesDisease ProgressionHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansImmunohistochemistryPredictive Value of TestsProgression-Free SurvivalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective StudiesSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckTime FactorsConceptsTumor proportion scoreObjective response ratePD-L1 expression statusDeath ligand 1 (PD-L1) expressionNeck squamous cell carcinomaImmune checkpoint inhibitorsLigand 1 expressionPD-L1 statusProgression-free survivalSquamous cell carcinomaKEYNOTE-040Pembrolizumab efficacyCheckpoint inhibitorsOverall survivalMetastatic HNSCCCell carcinomaNeck cancerClinical trialsProportion scoreInvestigator's choiceResponse rateExpression statusYouden indexHNSCCPatients
2017
Biomarkers predict enhanced clinical outcomes with afatinib versus methotrexate in patients with second-line recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck cancer
Cohen EEW, Licitra LF, Burtness B, Fayette J, Gauler T, Clement PM, Grau JJ, del Campo JM, Mailliez A, Haddad RI, Vermorken JB, Tahara M, Guigay J, Geoffrois L, Merlano MC, Dupuis N, Krämer N, Cong XJ, Gibson N, Solca F, Ehrnrooth E, Machiels J. Biomarkers predict enhanced clinical outcomes with afatinib versus methotrexate in patients with second-line recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck cancer. Annals Of Oncology 2017, 28: 2526-2532. PMID: 28961833, PMCID: PMC5834024, DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx344.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdministration, IntravenousAdministration, OralAfatinibAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticBiomarkers, TumorBiopsyCarcinoma, Squamous CellDisease-Free SurvivalHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMethotrexateNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPredictive Value of TestsQuinazolinesSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckConceptsProgression-free survivalMetastatic headEfficacy outcomesMedian progression-free survivalRecurrent/metastatic headNeck squamous cell carcinomaTumor biomarkersNeck 1 trialP16-positive diseaseSecond-line afatinibOverall study populationSubset of patientsP16-negative tumorsSquamous cell carcinomaEnhanced clinical outcomesBiomarker analysisM HNSCCTherapy-naïveBaseline characteristicsStudy entryClinical outcomesHNSCC patientsPlatinum therapyCell carcinomaNeck cancer
2011
Comparative Prognostic Value of Epidermal Growth Factor Quantitative Protein Expression Compared with FISH for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Pectasides E, Rampias T, Kountourakis P, Sasaki C, Kowalski D, Fountzilas G, Zaramboukas T, Rimm D, Burtness B, Psyrri A. Comparative Prognostic Value of Epidermal Growth Factor Quantitative Protein Expression Compared with FISH for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Clinical Cancer Research 2011, 17: 2947-2954. PMID: 21355076, DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-10-2040.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCarcinomaCarcinoma, Squamous CellEpidermal Growth FactorFemaleGene DosageGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMaleNeoplasms, Squamous CellPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisProteinsSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckSurvival AnalysisTissue Array Analysis
2007
Phosphorylation of Akt (Ser473) Predicts Poor Clinical Outcome in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Cancer
Yu Z, Weinberger PM, Sasaki C, Egleston BL, Speier WF, Haffty B, Kowalski D, Camp R, Rimm D, Vairaktaris E, Burtness B, Psyrri A. Phosphorylation of Akt (Ser473) Predicts Poor Clinical Outcome in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Cancer. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 2007, 16: 553-558. PMID: 17372251, DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-06-0121.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Squamous CellChi-Square DistributionFemaleHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOropharyngeal NeoplasmsPhosphorylationPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsProtein Array AnalysisProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktPTEN PhosphohydrolaseSurvival AnalysisConceptsNuclear p-AktAkt activationP-AktOropharyngeal squamous cell cancerSquamous cell carcinoma progressionPhosphorylated AktCohort of patientsLocal recurrence rateOverall survival rateSquamous cell cancerPoor clinical outcomeAdverse patient outcomesP-AKT levelsPromising molecular targetP-AKT expressionProtein expression levelsPhosphorylation of AktDisease recurrenceLocal recurrenceCell cancerClinical outcomesAdjusted analysisPrognostic significanceRecurrence ratePatient outcomes
2004
A preclinical xenotransplantation animal model to assess human hematopoietic stem cell engraftment
Angelopoulou MK, Rinder H, Wang C, Burtness B, Cooper DL, Krause DS. A preclinical xenotransplantation animal model to assess human hematopoietic stem cell engraftment. Transfusion 2004, 44: 555-566. PMID: 15043572, DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2004.03285.x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHuman cell engraftmentHuman CFU-MKCell engraftmentPLT engraftmentWBC engraftmentCFU-MKAutologous PBPC transplantationEnhancement of engraftmentMultilineage human hematopoiesisPercent of patientsPLT recoveryHuman WBCsMouse xenotransplantation modelHematopoietic stem cell engraftmentHuman hematopoietic stem cell engraftmentNOD-SCID miceStem cell engraftmentXenogeneic transplant modelBlood weeklyPBPC transplantationTransplant modelLiver abnormalitiesPatients CorrelateAutologous transplantationHuman PLTs