Skip to Main Content

9-12-24 MEDG : Learning as a Guide for Teaching

September 12, 2024
ID
12080

Transcript

  • 00:00Before, Janet gives introductions,
  • 00:02my name is Janet Tetro.
  • 00:04I'm the, vice chief for
  • 00:06education for the section of
  • 00:08general internal medicine.
  • 00:10Just wanted to let you
  • 00:11know the meeting is being
  • 00:12recorded, so you're gonna be
  • 00:13prompted to hit the okay
  • 00:15button. This is for our
  • 00:16colleagues who can't be here
  • 00:17live.
  • 00:19The section of g I
  • 00:20m is delighted to come
  • 00:22back together with our friends
  • 00:24from the Center for Medical
  • 00:25Education
  • 00:26to host our first,
  • 00:28of the academic year, a
  • 00:30co hosted session between,
  • 00:32GIM and the Center for
  • 00:34Medical Education.
  • 00:36And we're absolutely thrilled to
  • 00:38welcome Doctor. Rando as our
  • 00:39kickoff speaker for this session
  • 00:41for the year.
  • 00:43Doctor. Rando is the director
  • 00:45of pedagogy for YSM. So
  • 00:46a lot to learn from
  • 00:47him.
  • 00:49Before Janet introduces him, just
  • 00:51wanna remind folks that,
  • 00:53there's a full calendar of
  • 00:55events for the center of
  • 00:56medical education offerings, which is
  • 00:58robust and wonderful for educators
  • 01:01throughout Yale School of Medicine.
  • 01:03Please do note our upcoming
  • 01:05next co hosted session,
  • 01:07which will be on October
  • 01:08thirty first with GIM's own
  • 01:11doctor Ava Black on overcoming
  • 01:13imposter syndrome.
  • 01:15I'm gonna turn the virtual
  • 01:16podium over to Janet to
  • 01:17introduce doctor Rando.
  • 01:19Thanks a lot, Jeanette. I'm
  • 01:21always thrilled to have a
  • 01:22wonderful kickoff at the beginning
  • 01:24of our year. So thank
  • 01:25you, Bill. I've known Bill
  • 01:27for many years.
  • 01:29He's did his PhD at
  • 01:30Northwestern and has been a
  • 01:32really passionate educator over his
  • 01:34entire life
  • 01:35when he, many years ago,
  • 01:37was at Yale heading the
  • 01:38Graduate Center that then became
  • 01:40the Poorvu Center.
  • 01:42And when we were starting
  • 01:43our educational strategic plan
  • 01:45around
  • 01:46two thousand thirteen to fifteen,
  • 01:49Bill worked very closely with
  • 01:51us in helping many of
  • 01:52the aspects of the plan.
  • 01:54And when we had the
  • 01:55opportunity,
  • 01:56which under Jessica's leadership, we
  • 01:57were fab it was just
  • 01:58fabulous to get this position
  • 02:00to have a director of
  • 02:01pedagogy,
  • 02:02and we were able to
  • 02:03recruit him back. And we
  • 02:05are thrilled to have him
  • 02:06on board with us. So
  • 02:07thanks for everything that you're
  • 02:08doing, Bill. Welcome, everybody.
  • 02:13And his session today
  • 02:15is
  • 02:17very important called
  • 02:19learning
  • 02:19as a guide for teaching.
  • 02:22So it's all about learning,
  • 02:23changing the paradigm.
  • 02:30Can everyone see that?
  • 02:33Yep. That's good, Bill.
  • 02:40Janet, do you
  • 02:41Every everyone can text to
  • 02:43get their CAB credits, and
  • 02:45Reagan will put it also
  • 02:46in the chat. So that's
  • 02:48fine. Thanks, Bill. Yep.
  • 02:52What's really exciting
  • 02:54that and Dana really has
  • 02:55helped with this. We are
  • 02:57mapping all our sessions offered
  • 02:59at the center this year
  • 03:00with the
  • 03:02milestones that the
  • 03:04accreditation
  • 03:05council for GME put together.
  • 03:07They put a group together
  • 03:09of experts
  • 03:10to really help us as
  • 03:11clinician educators figure out
  • 03:13what
  • 03:14are our CME needs when
  • 03:16we go to a session.
  • 03:17So ours are all mapped
  • 03:19to the CE, the clinician
  • 03:21educator milestones.
  • 03:22This is relating to that
  • 03:25slide. Thanks, Bill.
  • 03:26Sure.
  • 03:28Alright.
  • 03:29Here we are.
  • 03:31Well, first of all, thank
  • 03:33you, Janet, for that wonderful
  • 03:35introduction. It is
  • 03:37a thrill to be for
  • 03:38me to be, back at
  • 03:40Yale. I just couldn't stay
  • 03:41away from the place.
  • 03:43And,
  • 03:44and an even greater thrill
  • 03:46for me to be starting
  • 03:47off this wonderful,
  • 03:50session,
  • 03:51to to kick off the
  • 03:53medical education
  • 03:54discussion group.
  • 03:56I hope this discussion leads
  • 03:58to many more.
  • 04:00I I hope it is
  • 04:01the beginning
  • 04:02of a an ongoing
  • 04:04long and elaborate conversation
  • 04:07about
  • 04:08what learning
  • 04:09can what we know about
  • 04:11learning.
  • 04:13What can that tell us
  • 04:14about teaching? Can that help
  • 04:15us teach in any way?
  • 04:17Can it help us reach
  • 04:18students understanding learning? Can it
  • 04:21help us make decisions
  • 04:23about
  • 04:24what we do in the
  • 04:25classroom?
  • 04:27That's what that's what we're
  • 04:28going to explore today. I
  • 04:29hope that everybody comes away
  • 04:31with,
  • 04:32something
  • 04:34that interests them, something that
  • 04:35they can use, and something
  • 04:37that they want to talk
  • 04:38about more.
  • 04:40But before we start, I'm
  • 04:42just gonna ask you to
  • 04:43do something.
  • 04:44I'm gonna ask you to
  • 04:46either in your mind or
  • 04:47if you have a piece
  • 04:48of paper and a pen
  • 04:49handy,
  • 04:51take a minute and think
  • 04:53about how you conceptualize
  • 04:55the learning process
  • 04:58and maybe draw a picture
  • 04:59of it. Is there
  • 05:02do you have a vision
  • 05:03or a thought or a
  • 05:04picture
  • 05:06of what what comes to
  • 05:07your mind when you think
  • 05:08about the learning process?
  • 05:10I'm just gonna give you
  • 05:12and or maybe it's a
  • 05:13word. Maybe it's a word,
  • 05:16but maybe it's a picture.
  • 05:17Maybe
  • 05:19it's a metaphor.
  • 05:22Maybe you have a dominant
  • 05:23metaphor. But I'm just gonna
  • 05:25give you a minute
  • 05:27to to just think about
  • 05:28that for a minute.
  • 05:29What does the learning process
  • 05:33look like to you?
  • 05:49Alright.
  • 05:51If you haven't finished your
  • 05:52drawing, you can keep drawing
  • 05:53as we go along. I
  • 05:55just wanted us to start
  • 05:56there,
  • 05:58and we'll come back to
  • 05:59that in a minute.
  • 06:01Alright. What are we gonna
  • 06:02do today?
  • 06:03Well, I've kind of conceptualized
  • 06:05this hour in two in
  • 06:06two parts. In the first
  • 06:08part,
  • 06:09I just wanna introduce,
  • 06:12a formal model of how
  • 06:14people learn. I don't know
  • 06:15if people have seen formal
  • 06:16models before. Some of you,
  • 06:18I'm guessing, have, but some
  • 06:19of you maybe have not.
  • 06:21What might a formal model
  • 06:22of learning even look like?
  • 06:23Where do they come from?
  • 06:25What is it?
  • 06:27And then in the second
  • 06:28part, we're gonna take two
  • 06:29principles from this one formal
  • 06:31model, and we're going to
  • 06:34actively apply them to teaching
  • 06:37and to our own teaching.
  • 06:38What does this model
  • 06:42or stated better?
  • 06:43What does thinking about this
  • 06:45model suggest
  • 06:46that I might do as
  • 06:48a teacher
  • 06:49that would help me
  • 06:50reach students,
  • 06:53enjoy teaching more,
  • 06:55all,
  • 06:57all the things that we
  • 06:58try to do
  • 06:59as instructors. That's kind of
  • 07:00the
  • 07:01question for today. Can understanding
  • 07:04something
  • 07:05about
  • 07:07learning
  • 07:09help with my teaching?
  • 07:12And
  • 07:15these are the these are
  • 07:16my,
  • 07:17general very, general objectives
  • 07:21that by the end of
  • 07:22this hour, you will have
  • 07:24a preliminary
  • 07:25understanding of a formal model
  • 07:27of t of learning
  • 07:29and
  • 07:31and,
  • 07:32be able to think about
  • 07:33it in terms of your
  • 07:34own model.
  • 07:36Is it like your model?
  • 07:37Is it different
  • 07:38from your model? Does it
  • 07:39add to it?
  • 07:41And the second objective
  • 07:42is that you will have
  • 07:44practice applying a formal model
  • 07:47of pedagogical principles
  • 07:50to your own teaching and
  • 07:51and,
  • 07:54see what that feels like.
  • 07:55Does that feel like something
  • 07:56that's fun and interesting to
  • 07:57do?
  • 07:58I hope so.
  • 08:01But as I said at
  • 08:02the beginning,
  • 08:03what I really my overall
  • 08:05objective is that this conversation
  • 08:08leads to more conversations,
  • 08:10along the same topic.
  • 08:12To that end, I wanna
  • 08:14talk a little bit about
  • 08:15how we converse in the
  • 08:16session.
  • 08:19I believe,
  • 08:21and Janet, you can just
  • 08:22nod. Is Janet monitoring the
  • 08:24chat?
  • 08:26Yes. Thank you, Janet.
  • 08:28So if you have a
  • 08:29if a question comes up
  • 08:30along the way,
  • 08:32drop it in the chat,
  • 08:34and Janet
  • 08:35will be monitoring it and
  • 08:36may and she can either
  • 08:38interrupt me from time to
  • 08:39time, or I'll look over
  • 08:40at her picture and see
  • 08:41her waving or she can
  • 08:42raise her hand.
  • 08:44But also,
  • 08:45if you have a,
  • 08:47something that you don't understand
  • 08:49or a question along the
  • 08:50way, please raise your hand,
  • 08:52and,
  • 08:54and I'll see that.
  • 08:56There will be a chance
  • 08:57in the middle for us.
  • 08:59We I am going to
  • 09:00do a one breakout
  • 09:03room, which, of course, you
  • 09:05you will all just be
  • 09:06popped into rooms,
  • 09:09to spend about five minutes
  • 09:10talking about a question I
  • 09:12will oppose. I hope you
  • 09:14attended and participate, but if
  • 09:15you don't feel like it,
  • 09:16that's fine too.
  • 09:18And then at the end,
  • 09:20I will save time for
  • 09:21questions. So that's kind of
  • 09:23the,
  • 09:26how this will play out,
  • 09:29and I'm looking forward to
  • 09:31every moment of it. Alright.
  • 09:32Here we go.
  • 09:34So
  • 09:35the model that we're going
  • 09:36to be working talking about
  • 09:38today is basic is called
  • 09:40constructivism.
  • 09:43It's been around for a
  • 09:44long time since the eighteen
  • 09:46nineties. And, generally,
  • 09:48the the beginning of constructivism
  • 09:51began with somebody whose name
  • 09:52you may recognize, Piaget,
  • 09:55and also Vygotsky
  • 09:57is also considered a constructivist.
  • 10:00It is a
  • 10:02learning theory that is rooted
  • 10:04in
  • 10:05the philosophy of epistemology,
  • 10:07which is the question of
  • 10:08how do we know things.
  • 10:11And
  • 10:12in the early years, the
  • 10:13early ideas around constructivism
  • 10:17were built around observing children.
  • 10:19You know? Children learn so
  • 10:21fast and so much and
  • 10:22so naturally
  • 10:23that it was a
  • 10:25so so people were wondering
  • 10:27how do they do that?
  • 10:28How do they learn to
  • 10:29speak? How do they learn
  • 10:31that
  • 10:31their hand is actually part
  • 10:33of their body and that
  • 10:34they can use it to
  • 10:35do things like pick things
  • 10:36up
  • 10:37and and smash them together?
  • 10:39And how do they discover
  • 10:40their voice and how that
  • 10:42they can make noise?
  • 10:43And then, of course, how
  • 10:44do they discover other things
  • 10:46like toys, and how do
  • 10:47they discover other people? How
  • 10:49eventually do they learn that
  • 10:51there's a difference between people
  • 10:52and toys? Hopefully, they learn
  • 10:54that. Not everyone does.
  • 10:57But,
  • 10:58ultimately, constructivism
  • 11:00is concerned
  • 11:01with the question of how
  • 11:02we make meaning.
  • 11:04How do we take all
  • 11:05of this stuff in the
  • 11:07environment
  • 11:08and turn it into meaning,
  • 11:09which is to say something
  • 11:10that we care about, something
  • 11:12that we can use to
  • 11:14make our lives better, to
  • 11:16move forward, to understand
  • 11:18what our place is in
  • 11:20the universe.
  • 11:24I wanna
  • 11:25call your attention to two
  • 11:27publications,
  • 11:29both fairly recent,
  • 11:31that are important to the
  • 11:33idea of constructivism
  • 11:35because
  • 11:35especially the first one, which
  • 11:37was published in nineteen ninety
  • 11:39nine, how people learn,
  • 11:42because it really
  • 11:46brought a a constructivist model
  • 11:48of learning into the forefront,
  • 11:50and it brought it to
  • 11:51people who who hadn't been
  • 11:52thinking about it. But for
  • 11:54me, I had been thinking
  • 11:55about it. But even for
  • 11:56me, when it came out,
  • 11:58I was astounded.
  • 12:00Of course, there's been
  • 12:02dads of research done on
  • 12:04constructivism
  • 12:06in the last hundred years,
  • 12:08but it was shocking to
  • 12:09me just how much we
  • 12:11know now about how people
  • 12:13learn,
  • 12:14how much this,
  • 12:16observational
  • 12:18field had turned into a,
  • 12:21empirical field. And even now
  • 12:24a,
  • 12:25a set of understandings that
  • 12:27can be studied neurologically,
  • 12:29that can be studied,
  • 12:31and and a lot of
  • 12:32these ideas are coming together
  • 12:35In how people learn,
  • 12:38the
  • 12:39fundamental tenant of constructivism is
  • 12:41stated, and I've got it
  • 12:42on a quote here.
  • 12:44It is quite simple
  • 12:46that
  • 12:48the process of learning is
  • 12:50that new understandings
  • 12:52are constructed
  • 12:53by people on a foundation
  • 12:55of existing understandings and experiences.
  • 12:59That the relation that everything
  • 13:02that we learn that is
  • 13:04new
  • 13:05is based upon
  • 13:07things that we already know
  • 13:09and our capacity
  • 13:10to make sense of and
  • 13:12integrate
  • 13:13new things
  • 13:14in the context
  • 13:15of what we already know,
  • 13:17and that's what we're gonna
  • 13:18explore today.
  • 13:20When how learning two came
  • 13:22out in twenty eighteen,
  • 13:25boy,
  • 13:26I can I I
  • 13:28things had
  • 13:29changed? And I I call
  • 13:30it,
  • 13:32neo constructivism
  • 13:34because it still had a
  • 13:35constructivist base,
  • 13:37but now
  • 13:39and we are gonna we're
  • 13:40gonna look at this
  • 13:42in in in in how
  • 13:43people learn too.
  • 13:46The idea of knowledge and
  • 13:49skills
  • 13:50are so much more closely
  • 13:52intertwined,
  • 13:53and we're gonna talk about
  • 13:55that relationship between knowledge and
  • 13:57skills,
  • 13:58how skills are not
  • 14:01separate from knowledge, they are
  • 14:02embedded in knowledge.
  • 14:04And that
  • 14:05knowledge isn't separate from skills,
  • 14:07knowledge is embedded in skills,
  • 14:09which
  • 14:11I think maybe we know
  • 14:12intuitively,
  • 14:13but now we're understanding that
  • 14:15mechanism,
  • 14:16even more. So,
  • 14:19let's
  • 14:20start
  • 14:21by talking about
  • 14:23the basic tenets of constructivism.
  • 14:26Now
  • 14:29this image in front of
  • 14:30you is obviously
  • 14:31it's
  • 14:32it it it is simply
  • 14:34a
  • 14:35representation of a network.
  • 14:38I find it useful. I
  • 14:39find it when I think
  • 14:41of this is what I
  • 14:42think about. I think about
  • 14:42this is the mind of
  • 14:43a student who is walking
  • 14:44into our class. This is
  • 14:45the mind, a massive network
  • 14:54of ideas
  • 14:56and thoughts.
  • 14:57A massive network of skills.
  • 15:00Things are tightly connected. Things
  • 15:01are loosely connected.
  • 15:03And
  • 15:04what I really wish I
  • 15:05could do, but I'm gonna
  • 15:06have to ask you to
  • 15:07do it with your imagination,
  • 15:09is put this thing in
  • 15:10motion.
  • 15:12It is spinning and turning.
  • 15:14It's throbbing. The the the
  • 15:17outsides are coming into the
  • 15:18middle, and the middle is
  • 15:19going out to the outside.
  • 15:21It is constantly in motion.
  • 15:23That said,
  • 15:25for every person,
  • 15:27there is a shape.
  • 15:28There is a shape. What's
  • 15:30in my middle is different
  • 15:31than what's in your middle.
  • 15:33What what's on the outskirts
  • 15:34of mine might be the
  • 15:35middle for you.
  • 15:37But this is this is
  • 15:38this is the mind, and
  • 15:39it is just doing this
  • 15:41all day long.
  • 15:43Let's go let's explore this
  • 15:44a little bit further.
  • 15:49We can look at constructivism
  • 15:51as a dynamic process of
  • 15:53constructing and orchestrating
  • 15:55our own learning.
  • 15:56I love that last part,
  • 15:59orchestrating. I think this really
  • 16:01comes
  • 16:02is a point
  • 16:03made much more deeply in
  • 16:05how we learn too.
  • 16:07The idea
  • 16:08that this construction process happens,
  • 16:11but maybe the most important
  • 16:13part of that construction process
  • 16:15is our capacity to orchestrate
  • 16:17it.
  • 16:18Our capacity to orchestrate
  • 16:20or or to orchestrate our
  • 16:22own learning. It's a complex
  • 16:23system made up of knowledge,
  • 16:25skills, attitudes, and motives.
  • 16:28On the level of knowledge
  • 16:29on the left side,
  • 16:32Some of these nodes represent
  • 16:34ideas.
  • 16:35A single node sitting all
  • 16:37by itself, which you can
  • 16:38see a bunch of those,
  • 16:39might be a single idea.
  • 16:43It just sits out there.
  • 16:44There it is, something we
  • 16:45learned along the way.
  • 16:48Not terribly,
  • 16:50important all the time if
  • 16:51it sits on the periphery.
  • 16:52Facts. Facts that we've learned.
  • 16:54But everything nothing is not
  • 16:57connected. The connection may not
  • 16:58be strong, but it's all
  • 17:00connected.
  • 17:01Stories.
  • 17:02I don't know. I like
  • 17:03to think of maybe that
  • 17:05clump over there on the
  • 17:06right. That might be a
  • 17:08whole story. That might be
  • 17:09the story about the time
  • 17:10I went skiing in Canada.
  • 17:12And it includes all kinds
  • 17:13of knowledge
  • 17:14about Canada and about skiing
  • 17:16and about skills and about
  • 17:17my family,
  • 17:18but
  • 17:20that knowledge is embedded in
  • 17:22that story. It's embedded in
  • 17:24those experience. That's where I
  • 17:25keep it. If somebody if
  • 17:27I'm in a class and
  • 17:28somebody mentions
  • 17:30Canada, boom.
  • 17:32That's that whole clump,
  • 17:35it it it becomes becomes,
  • 17:38becomes,
  • 17:39is involved in how I
  • 17:41remember. And, of course, finally,
  • 17:43at the bottom are models.
  • 17:47That big chunk in the
  • 17:48middle might be for a
  • 17:51medical student,
  • 17:52that student's
  • 17:54emerging model of the human
  • 17:56body or the emerging model
  • 17:59of the causes of disease.
  • 18:01It got big nodes in
  • 18:02it because they're very important.
  • 18:04It's connected to other nodes
  • 18:06because I'm trying to build
  • 18:08a model
  • 18:09that lets me know
  • 18:11how does the body work.
  • 18:13You know, that that might
  • 18:15be it.
  • 18:16Hopefully, that's it. Hopefully, it's
  • 18:18not off on some corner
  • 18:19somewhere.
  • 18:20But it but but a
  • 18:22person's
  • 18:23medical knowledge could be that
  • 18:25big chunk that's off to
  • 18:26the side.
  • 18:28I don't think that would
  • 18:29be ideal. I think we
  • 18:30would like what our students
  • 18:32are learning
  • 18:33about medicine
  • 18:35to be
  • 18:36deeply integrated
  • 18:38with the things that they
  • 18:39care most about, who they
  • 18:41are, and what their goals
  • 18:42are for life,
  • 18:44which is that kind of
  • 18:46centerpiece.
  • 18:47Let's look at the other
  • 18:49side, skills.
  • 18:50This is
  • 18:51very interesting.
  • 18:54One of the skills that
  • 18:56is represented by this moving,
  • 19:00network is metacognition,
  • 19:03the ability
  • 19:04to understand our own minds,
  • 19:06to know how we think,
  • 19:08to to be able to
  • 19:10talk about how we think.
  • 19:12In some way, our ability
  • 19:13to describe this network,
  • 19:15to know what matters most
  • 19:17to us and what matters
  • 19:18less,
  • 19:19to matter to know,
  • 19:21about,
  • 19:22things that are difficult for
  • 19:24us to learn and things
  • 19:25that we think are easy.
  • 19:26Metacognition,
  • 19:29is connected to another incredibly
  • 19:31important skill, which we call
  • 19:33executive function.
  • 19:35And executive function is basically
  • 19:37the orchestrating.
  • 19:38Executive function is,
  • 19:41do I can I move
  • 19:42my brain to do what
  • 19:44I want it to do?
  • 19:46Can I can I can
  • 19:47I tell it to remember?
  • 19:49Can I tell it to
  • 19:50focus? You know, that's maybe
  • 19:53maybe at the core
  • 19:54of executive
  • 19:55function is is my ability
  • 19:58to focus,
  • 20:00my ability to keep you
  • 20:01know, I'm gonna try to
  • 20:03keep my mind open. That's
  • 20:05executive function.
  • 20:06You know, that that's me
  • 20:08telling my own brain, stay
  • 20:09open.
  • 20:11I know I have a
  • 20:11tendency to close down. Stay
  • 20:13open. Executive function.
  • 20:15Do things,
  • 20:20This is a big problem
  • 20:21I have. I think I'm
  • 20:22gonna take it step by
  • 20:23step.
  • 20:24Sure. I could sit here
  • 20:26and obsess about the whole
  • 20:27problem, but I'm not gonna
  • 20:28do that. I'm gonna take
  • 20:30it step by step.
  • 20:32Diagnosis
  • 20:34is executive function.
  • 20:37Problem solving requires
  • 20:39high executive function.
  • 20:42And the last skill I
  • 20:43wanna talk about
  • 20:46is inferential reasoning.
  • 20:48And this is
  • 20:49a a topic that
  • 20:51how we learn to really
  • 20:53addresses quite beautifully.
  • 20:55Because what it addresses
  • 20:57is the fact that in
  • 20:58this network that we're looking
  • 20:59at,
  • 21:00some of those ideas and
  • 21:02facts and skills
  • 21:03come from the outside world,
  • 21:05but a lot of them
  • 21:07come from just inside my
  • 21:08head. We create our own
  • 21:10knowledge.
  • 21:11We we take two nodules
  • 21:13and smash them together, and
  • 21:15we discover something new.
  • 21:17We'll take one of those
  • 21:18nodules and rip it apart
  • 21:20and realize, oh, it's actually
  • 21:22two things, and now we
  • 21:23have new knowledge. This process
  • 21:27of inferential reasoning is is
  • 21:30how we create knowledge. And
  • 21:32I think it's something that
  • 21:33we also
  • 21:36even when we're teaching facts
  • 21:38and ideas,
  • 21:40we wanna give our students
  • 21:42an opportunity to do that,
  • 21:46because learning to do that,
  • 21:48learning to do inferential reasoning
  • 21:50isn't just a skill by
  • 21:51itself.
  • 21:52We know now that
  • 21:54the knowledge that we create
  • 21:56through inferential reasoning is knowledge
  • 21:58that we know deeply.
  • 22:01In other words, they aren't
  • 22:02connected. The skill of inferential
  • 22:04reasoning
  • 22:05is deeply, deeply connected
  • 22:09to the knowledge that we
  • 22:10use in
  • 22:11inferential reasoning.
  • 22:14And, I mean, it's it's
  • 22:15it's certainly
  • 22:17suggests
  • 22:18that
  • 22:20the way we teach
  • 22:22here using small groups,
  • 22:24asking students to engage each
  • 22:26other and solve problems,
  • 22:30is not just a good
  • 22:31idea.
  • 22:32It's necessary.
  • 22:34It's necessary for deep learning,
  • 22:38to high function. And what
  • 22:40could be more high functioning
  • 22:41than functioning
  • 22:43as a physician or a
  • 22:44PA or a researcher
  • 22:46or a nurse or any
  • 22:48other profession. That's human beings'
  • 22:50high functioning.
  • 22:54To do that, we have
  • 22:55to have learned very, very
  • 22:57deeply, and that requires inferential
  • 22:59reasoning.
  • 23:00So let's let's take a
  • 23:02let's let's now take a
  • 23:04look at,
  • 23:05how this works,
  • 23:07in action. As I said,
  • 23:08I wanna take a look
  • 23:10at two principles
  • 23:12of
  • 23:14constructivism
  • 23:15and see how they affect,
  • 23:17teaching.
  • 23:20But I'll I'll stop here
  • 23:21for a minute and see
  • 23:22if if there's anything in
  • 23:23the chat from, Janet
  • 23:26or if anyone
  • 23:27has a a quick question
  • 23:29to ask answer.
  • 23:31Nothing in the chat, Phil.
  • 23:33Alright.
  • 23:34Okay.
  • 23:36On we go.
  • 23:40As I said,
  • 23:42there was a lot we
  • 23:43could talk about with constructivism,
  • 23:45and that's not what I
  • 23:46wanted to I don't wanna
  • 23:47just do that today. I
  • 23:48wanna now talk about two
  • 23:49principles
  • 23:50that I think you'll find
  • 23:51really interesting.
  • 23:53Again,
  • 23:54the foundational
  • 23:55idea.
  • 23:56Learning
  • 23:58is the process
  • 23:59of,
  • 24:01is a process by which
  • 24:03new understandings
  • 24:04are constructed
  • 24:05on a foundation
  • 24:07of existing
  • 24:08of existing understanding and experiences.
  • 24:12Well, because of that,
  • 24:14there's one term that
  • 24:16people that constructivists
  • 24:18talk about a lot, and
  • 24:20it's prior knowledge.
  • 24:21Obviously, prior knowledge is just
  • 24:23the term which is existing
  • 24:25understandings.
  • 24:26Prior knowledge is what students
  • 24:28walk into our classes with.
  • 24:30Prior knowledge. What they know
  • 24:33about everything and particularly what
  • 24:34they know about what we're
  • 24:35teaching.
  • 24:37Obviously, if new information is
  • 24:39built on this thing, this
  • 24:40thing must be pretty important.
  • 24:42It is. So let's talk
  • 24:44about but let's talk about
  • 24:45some aspects of it that
  • 24:46are also important.
  • 24:48One is
  • 24:49that prior knowledge
  • 24:51can be both explicit and
  • 24:53implicit.
  • 24:54Meaning, this network that we
  • 24:56see here,
  • 24:58some of it is things
  • 24:59that we know and can
  • 25:00speak about,
  • 25:02but some of it is
  • 25:03stuff that we don't know.
  • 25:05And yet it's functioning
  • 25:07in our neural network and
  • 25:09affecting how we think about
  • 25:10things. We're not even aware
  • 25:12that it's there.
  • 25:14Implicit bias would be an
  • 25:16example
  • 25:17of
  • 25:18implicit knowledge. Implicit bias
  • 25:21is a knowledge structure. It
  • 25:23includes beliefs. It may include
  • 25:25facts.
  • 25:26It's implicit.
  • 25:29But we have implicit knowledge
  • 25:30about everything. We have implicit
  • 25:32body of implicit knowledge about
  • 25:33the human body
  • 25:35that we may have learned
  • 25:36as children.
  • 25:37We've learned it implicitly.
  • 25:41So that's important. Explicit or
  • 25:43implicit.
  • 25:45Prior knowledge contains errors.
  • 25:48Not sometimes,
  • 25:49always.
  • 25:51Oh, all knowledge
  • 25:53contains
  • 25:53errors in and the error
  • 25:55might even be let me
  • 25:57give you an example.
  • 25:59I might know that
  • 26:01Augusta is the capital of
  • 26:02Maine.
  • 26:03That's true.
  • 26:05But
  • 26:06the picture
  • 26:07that I call up in
  • 26:08my mind of Augusta
  • 26:11is a beautiful seacoast city
  • 26:13with seagulls
  • 26:14and bells clanging.
  • 26:16That's not right. That's Portland.
  • 26:19That's not Augusta. Augusta is
  • 26:21landlocked.
  • 26:22So
  • 26:23it's true. I know the
  • 26:25capital of Maine,
  • 26:27and yet
  • 26:28my picture
  • 26:29of it is not right.
  • 26:31It's Portland.
  • 26:32And so
  • 26:34all correct knowledge
  • 26:37will contain an element that
  • 26:38needs to be refined.
  • 26:41So that that's a really
  • 26:42important thing to know.
  • 26:45And this third thing is
  • 26:46that prior knowledge can be
  • 26:48very resistant to change.
  • 26:50Sometimes things we have prior
  • 26:51knowledge about, we've known or
  • 26:53believed
  • 26:55for our whole lives.
  • 26:58Sometimes
  • 26:59a piece of prior knowledge
  • 27:01or an idea or a
  • 27:03thought
  • 27:07can be,
  • 27:09something that
  • 27:12many other nodes in our
  • 27:13knowledge structure are dependent upon.
  • 27:16I'm not gonna give that
  • 27:17up.
  • 27:18If nothing else, at any
  • 27:20given moment in time,
  • 27:22the knowledge I have, I've
  • 27:24worked to create.
  • 27:25Why? I constructed it. I
  • 27:27either constructed it from the
  • 27:28outside or I constructed it
  • 27:30through inferential reasoning. The point
  • 27:32is I've put effort into
  • 27:33my into my knowledge,
  • 27:35and
  • 27:36I may not wanna change
  • 27:37it.
  • 27:38I may not wanna change
  • 27:40it.
  • 27:40Okay. Let's take a look
  • 27:42at prior knowledge
  • 27:44in action.
  • 27:46Janet, are you wait. No.
  • 27:50I thought you have a
  • 27:51question.
  • 27:52I don't know if you
  • 27:52wanna answer it now. We
  • 27:53could hold off. But, we
  • 27:55have one question, Bill, that
  • 27:57how does constructivism
  • 27:58relate to the concepts
  • 28:00of Bloom's taxonomy?
  • 28:04Okay. I think I can
  • 28:05do that now because it's
  • 28:07a great question.
  • 28:10Bloom's taxonomy,
  • 28:11for those of you and
  • 28:12I I don't have a
  • 28:13slide of it, but bloom's
  • 28:15taxonomy
  • 28:17posits
  • 28:18that learning,
  • 28:21that has different levels.
  • 28:25From at the bottom level,
  • 28:26it's often phrased as a
  • 28:28triangle,
  • 28:29and the bottom level
  • 28:31is knowledge.
  • 28:33So if I were to
  • 28:36I would say the little
  • 28:37tiny dots.
  • 28:40It's it's it's not complete,
  • 28:41but I'm gonna say the
  • 28:42little tiny dots into our
  • 28:44knowledge, our nodes of knowledge.
  • 28:47The larger that dot gets,
  • 28:49then it might be
  • 28:53more
  • 28:54complicated
  • 28:56concepts,
  • 28:57slightly bigger.
  • 29:00Analyses and models, bigger and
  • 29:02bigger.
  • 29:04Bloom's tax but Bloom's taxonomy
  • 29:06also talks about these things
  • 29:08as skills, which this does
  • 29:10too.
  • 29:11So when I'm engaging in
  • 29:13synthesis,
  • 29:14putting things together,
  • 29:16or analysis,
  • 29:17taking things apart,
  • 29:19I might be doing those
  • 29:20dark lines
  • 29:22in the middle.
  • 29:23Those are strong connections.
  • 29:26Those are,
  • 29:28elements and ideas that were
  • 29:29formed
  • 29:30through
  • 29:32hard intellectual
  • 29:33work,
  • 29:34analysis,
  • 29:36synthesis.
  • 29:38And finally,
  • 29:40when I was referring earlier
  • 29:42to,
  • 29:43excuse me, to inferential reasoning,
  • 29:47that's when we get into
  • 29:49creation. That's creation. That's exactly
  • 29:51what that is. So when
  • 29:53we engage our students in
  • 29:54inferential reasoning,
  • 29:56we're engaging them in knowledge
  • 29:58creation. So I hope that's
  • 30:00a start, but we can
  • 30:01talk about that more. But
  • 30:03that's my that's my take
  • 30:05on that. Alright.
  • 30:07Let's let's come here. Now
  • 30:09what is the role of
  • 30:10prior knowledge,
  • 30:12say, in the classroom, in
  • 30:13learning? So this, again, is
  • 30:15just a visualization.
  • 30:18This isn't you know, it
  • 30:19doesn't really look like this.
  • 30:21But, anyway,
  • 30:22so here on
  • 30:25the right side of the
  • 30:26screen is a piece of
  • 30:27new knowledge, a skill sitting
  • 30:28out there. It's in our
  • 30:29minds. We're about to toss
  • 30:31it to our students.
  • 30:33And
  • 30:34according to constructivism,
  • 30:36what we're doing is we're
  • 30:37tossing that new knowledge into
  • 30:39this prior knowledge and skills
  • 30:40network.
  • 30:42And, basically,
  • 30:44there's three things that can
  • 30:45happen.
  • 30:48One is and we'll I'll
  • 30:49do the bottom first.
  • 30:51One is
  • 30:52it bounces off. Doesn't even
  • 30:54go in.
  • 30:56No. You know? Just bounces
  • 30:58off.
  • 31:00And there's a bunch of
  • 31:00reasons
  • 31:02why that could happen.
  • 31:04One is I'm not paying
  • 31:05attention.
  • 31:07One is
  • 31:08I'm not there.
  • 31:10Okay. That's a drastic reason
  • 31:12why why,
  • 31:13it it never reached me
  • 31:14to begin with.
  • 31:16But another reason is I
  • 31:18can't make sense of it.
  • 31:20I'm not interested in it.
  • 31:22It doesn't fit in with
  • 31:23my current understanding.
  • 31:25I'm sticking with my understanding.
  • 31:28I'm I'm I'm just not
  • 31:30I'm not ready
  • 31:31to learn that,
  • 31:34and the focus of my
  • 31:35neural network is elsewhere.
  • 31:38In which case, the thing
  • 31:39that we said, boom
  • 31:40boom bounces off.
  • 31:42And anyone who's ever taught
  • 31:44a class as have I,
  • 31:45hundreds of classes, where I've
  • 31:47said something
  • 31:48twenty times
  • 31:49and then on the test
  • 31:50or quiz,
  • 31:52they're still giving this answer
  • 31:55from six weeks ago. It's
  • 31:56happened to all of us.
  • 31:57Well, guess what was happening
  • 31:58all quarter? Bang, bang, bang,
  • 32:00bouncing off.
  • 32:02That's not a good outcome.
  • 32:04Second outcome on the top,
  • 32:05the purple line.
  • 32:07It comes in and it
  • 32:09stays, but it stays in
  • 32:10the outskirts.
  • 32:12And,
  • 32:15it's it's connected. Actually, I
  • 32:18probably
  • 32:19it it should have a
  • 32:20line going to it. I
  • 32:21I missed that.
  • 32:22It is connected,
  • 32:24but it's connected
  • 32:25on the outscore on the
  • 32:27outskirts.
  • 32:28It's in book learning.
  • 32:30It's something that I lock
  • 32:32away,
  • 32:33but I don't actually take
  • 32:34in deeply.
  • 32:36And the third outcome is
  • 32:37the orange line,
  • 32:39which goes right into the
  • 32:40middle.
  • 32:43And that's usually what we
  • 32:44want. And when that happens,
  • 32:49what this is here's when
  • 32:50that happens, when that thing
  • 32:51goes right in the middle,
  • 32:52something begins to happen.
  • 32:55Suddenly, our neural network changes,
  • 32:58and
  • 32:59and and that new piece
  • 33:00of knowledge
  • 33:01changes all the knowledge around
  • 33:02it. It might. I never
  • 33:04knew that worked that way.
  • 33:06It might be so inspiring,
  • 33:07so profound
  • 33:09that after a time,
  • 33:11it isn't even
  • 33:12it's not distinguishable
  • 33:14as its former self. It
  • 33:16has been integrated
  • 33:17into our network,
  • 33:19and it has changed all
  • 33:20the information around it.
  • 33:23Wow. You know, that's the
  • 33:25kind of that doesn't happen
  • 33:26every day in learning,
  • 33:28but it does happen
  • 33:30that somebody
  • 33:32that we teach something that
  • 33:33really changes
  • 33:35how students understand a topic.
  • 33:39Sometimes we might even be
  • 33:42teaching something
  • 33:43which changes
  • 33:44how students feel about the
  • 33:46world
  • 33:47or themselves
  • 33:49or their profession,
  • 33:50their goals, whatever. You know?
  • 33:52Some teaching is that profound
  • 33:55that it actually changes the
  • 33:57center
  • 33:58of
  • 33:59who we are
  • 34:00and and how we think
  • 34:01about things.
  • 34:02That's a good right.
  • 34:04It's like, well,
  • 34:06Well, I think somebody might
  • 34:08need muted.
  • 34:11You know, let's open it
  • 34:12back. I'm trying to look
  • 34:13in right now, but
  • 34:15yeah.
  • 34:16It was kinda like
  • 34:18Thank
  • 34:23You're muted, Bill.
  • 34:32Thank you.
  • 34:39So what I wanna think
  • 34:40about now
  • 34:42and
  • 34:44is
  • 34:46this,
  • 34:48the most important insight
  • 34:50that our our work on
  • 34:52prior knowledge has taught us
  • 34:53is one thing,
  • 34:55which is that if we
  • 34:56want this to happen,
  • 34:58if we want let me
  • 34:59let me go back to
  • 35:05I wanna go back to
  • 35:10this slide.
  • 35:13If we want the middle
  • 35:14thing to happen,
  • 35:16what we need to do,
  • 35:17there's something we can do
  • 35:19to help that happen. It's
  • 35:20called activation.
  • 35:22We have to activate
  • 35:24students' prior knowledge.
  • 35:26This is
  • 35:28the the which means
  • 35:31because when they come into
  • 35:32our class, this network exists.
  • 35:35But
  • 35:37to get it
  • 35:39constructing,
  • 35:40it has to be activated.
  • 35:42It has to be turned
  • 35:43on.
  • 35:45We have to be remembering
  • 35:46that that our job today
  • 35:48is not just to listen
  • 35:49to what you're saying, you,
  • 35:50the teacher.
  • 35:52It is to come to
  • 35:53terms with what we think.
  • 35:55That's what we're trying to
  • 35:56affect,
  • 35:57our own thinking.
  • 35:58So we as teachers
  • 36:01will have a better chance
  • 36:03of that central thing if
  • 36:05we've activated
  • 36:06students'
  • 36:07prior knowledge.
  • 36:09And if we look at
  • 36:10this drop this diagram
  • 36:12in terms of activation versus
  • 36:14nonactivation,
  • 36:15certainly,
  • 36:16we can say that that
  • 36:18bounce off experience
  • 36:20is
  • 36:22prior knowledge that is not
  • 36:23activated. It's just sorry. It's
  • 36:25asleep right now.
  • 36:27It's,
  • 36:29in the second one, in
  • 36:30the purple example,
  • 36:32it's kind of on, but
  • 36:34today, I am just listening
  • 36:36for sorta, you know, what
  • 36:38extra facts I can get.
  • 36:40I am not actively
  • 36:42processing
  • 36:43as in the third thing,
  • 36:44which is I am not
  • 36:45taking this new information
  • 36:47and asking myself, how does
  • 36:49this change how I think
  • 36:51about the process?
  • 36:54And we as teachers can
  • 36:55check can affect that a
  • 36:56little bit.
  • 36:59For example,
  • 37:02I'll give you two examples.
  • 37:03One is from this session.
  • 37:05The first thing I did
  • 37:06when we started was to
  • 37:08ask you to conceptualize
  • 37:11your own model of learning,
  • 37:13and
  • 37:14I just wanted to activate
  • 37:16that.
  • 37:17I just some of you
  • 37:18may have models,
  • 37:21maybe not. But I wanted
  • 37:23you to spend a minute
  • 37:25thinking about the question, how
  • 37:27do I think about learning
  • 37:29to activate that piece
  • 37:31so that as I talk
  • 37:32about this new model,
  • 37:34I'm hoping you're more likely
  • 37:36to integrate those two things,
  • 37:38that this model
  • 37:39becomes part of your model
  • 37:41or at least some of
  • 37:42it so that you can
  • 37:43use it.
  • 37:44Activation
  • 37:45of prior knowledge
  • 37:47is one of the key
  • 37:50foundations
  • 37:51of constructivist
  • 37:52learning.
  • 37:54So
  • 37:54now is the time when
  • 37:55we're gonna
  • 37:56do our breakout thing.
  • 38:00In a minute, you're going
  • 38:01to be
  • 38:02popped into a group of
  • 38:04roughly six other learners,
  • 38:08and I want you to
  • 38:09think about some things.
  • 38:12I want you to think
  • 38:13about
  • 38:13a class you teach
  • 38:15in which
  • 38:17you can say that prior
  • 38:19knowledge students' prior knowledge is
  • 38:21important.
  • 38:23I don't know. Maybe maybe
  • 38:24you've noticed
  • 38:26that there seem to be
  • 38:27conceptions that students are unwilling
  • 38:29to let go of,
  • 38:33or maybe the way you
  • 38:34teach really does rely on
  • 38:37what students know before.
  • 38:40Think about that.
  • 38:42Think about the prior knowledge.
  • 38:44Is it generally accurate, or
  • 38:46is it generally
  • 38:47inaccurate?
  • 38:48Are you building on an
  • 38:49accurate foundation,
  • 38:51or are you really trying
  • 38:52to let them let go
  • 38:54of an inaccurate
  • 38:55representation
  • 38:56and
  • 38:58switch it for an accurate
  • 38:59one. That's harder to do.
  • 39:01You can't do that if
  • 39:03you don't engage
  • 39:05prior knowledge. And this is
  • 39:06the experience, again, so many
  • 39:08teachers have had
  • 39:09where they say a concept
  • 39:11over and over and over.
  • 39:13And then at the end,
  • 39:15students are still answering questions
  • 39:17using their own model.
  • 39:19There was some of you
  • 39:20may have seen
  • 39:23many years ago, I believe
  • 39:24it was in the seventies,
  • 39:27Harvard College
  • 39:29took out a camera
  • 39:31and asked graduating seniors
  • 39:34why it's cold, all of
  • 39:36whom had taken physics and
  • 39:38astronomy.
  • 39:39Okay?
  • 39:40Why is it colder in
  • 39:41the winter?
  • 39:43And, again,
  • 39:45many of them, smart kids
  • 39:47smart kids who had learned
  • 39:48about the tilting of the
  • 39:50axis, etcetera,
  • 39:51said,
  • 39:53I think it's because the
  • 39:54sun the earth is further
  • 39:55away from the sun.
  • 39:57And and what is that?
  • 39:59That is a great example
  • 40:01of prior knowledge holding on
  • 40:03and not letting go.
  • 40:06And and it it's it's
  • 40:07called a private universe. It's
  • 40:09a great video. I I
  • 40:10I I suggest you take
  • 40:11a look at it. I
  • 40:12don't think it is particular
  • 40:14to Harvard. I think it
  • 40:15would happen with any undergraduate,
  • 40:17but we've all faced that.
  • 40:20So
  • 40:20what is the prior knowledge
  • 40:22that students might be coming
  • 40:23into your class with? A
  • 40:25bias, a belief effect.
  • 40:27And if you were to
  • 40:28start class by engaging
  • 40:31that knowledge, how might you
  • 40:32do it?
  • 40:33I did it by having
  • 40:34you draw a conception.
  • 40:36Once, I'll give you another
  • 40:38example, I did it when
  • 40:39I was starting a section
  • 40:40on leadership,
  • 40:42and
  • 40:44I started off with a
  • 40:45class of about fifteen students.
  • 40:47And I said, I'm gonna
  • 40:48stand at the board and
  • 40:49you tell me, let's write
  • 40:51down a name of every
  • 40:52you know, a leader. Just
  • 40:53shout them out. We did
  • 40:54that for ten minutes.
  • 40:56And but the end, we
  • 40:56had a whole board full
  • 40:58of leaders. And then I
  • 40:59stood
  • 41:00back and we looked at
  • 41:01it.
  • 41:02What do you see?
  • 41:04What is our collective
  • 41:06thought about leadership? Well, I'm
  • 41:08gonna tell you something. Now
  • 41:09this was about thirty years
  • 41:10ago, but I'm gonna tell
  • 41:11you one thing, and none
  • 41:13of the students noticed it.
  • 41:15I had to say it
  • 41:16at the end.
  • 41:17Not one woman.
  • 41:19It was all men.
  • 41:21And what a great way
  • 41:24to start
  • 41:25a section on leadership
  • 41:28than highlighting for my students
  • 41:31an aspect of their
  • 41:33thinking, their current thinking
  • 41:35about leadership.
  • 41:37And in this case, a
  • 41:38kind of nefarious one, you
  • 41:40know, one that needed to
  • 41:41be explored.
  • 41:42I I I may you
  • 41:43know, I got a bit
  • 41:44lucky in that, but that's
  • 41:46the kind of thing I'm
  • 41:46talking about. Alright. I'm gonna
  • 41:49give you I'll give you
  • 41:50about five minutes,
  • 41:52and,
  • 41:54my my good colleague, Ed,
  • 41:55is going to put you
  • 41:57into groups. If you end
  • 41:59up in a group with
  • 42:00nobody, he will pop you
  • 42:01into a group with somebody.
  • 42:03Take five minutes
  • 42:04and talk about
  • 42:06these three questions. How might
  • 42:07you activate
  • 42:09and engage students
  • 42:10prior knowledge?
  • 42:12Okay, Ed? Thanks, Bill. I'm
  • 42:14opening all the rooms now.
  • 42:16Thank you.
  • 42:32Welcome back.
  • 42:36Before we go on, would
  • 42:37could,
  • 42:38one person,
  • 42:41share
  • 42:42a an example of activating
  • 42:44prior knowledge?
  • 42:50Bill, let
  • 42:51me I can take that
  • 42:52one because I, I got,
  • 42:54shut down,
  • 42:55but there were very good
  • 42:56comments in my group. Can
  • 42:58you hear me? Yep. Yep.
  • 42:59Perfect.
  • 43:01So I I think that,
  • 43:03I really like the comment
  • 43:04of how patients can be
  • 43:06so activating
  • 43:07and and suddenly bring this
  • 43:09whole world of information where
  • 43:11to build on. So there
  • 43:12was discussion about that.
  • 43:15There was also comment about
  • 43:17how,
  • 43:18assessment and examination can also
  • 43:21be a trigger for that.
  • 43:24And and a third one
  • 43:25about the preconceptions
  • 43:27that the students come in
  • 43:28with that can be helpful
  • 43:30to build on. And I
  • 43:31think that along those lines,
  • 43:35I I I wanted to
  • 43:37ask you, you talked a
  • 43:38lot about constructivism.
  • 43:39Thank you very much because
  • 43:40usually we don't,
  • 43:41but this was the opposite.
  • 43:43We didn't talk about positivism,
  • 43:45objectivism, etcetera, etcetera,
  • 43:47where the students often will
  • 43:49come with a lot of
  • 43:50knowledge, you know, RCTs and
  • 43:52numbers, but let's sew on
  • 43:54constructivism.
  • 43:55And and I guess that
  • 43:56the final point is that
  • 43:57once something that is quite
  • 43:59activating is thinking about oneself.
  • 44:01You know? What is it
  • 44:02that the students themselves
  • 44:04have by ways of past
  • 44:05experiences? We heard example of
  • 44:07preconceptions
  • 44:08about conception,
  • 44:10about reproductive health, etcetera. So
  • 44:12I'll I'll stop there.
  • 44:15Thank you so much for
  • 44:16that. I mean, as I
  • 44:17said, at the center of
  • 44:18that network is the self.
  • 44:20That's the center.
  • 44:22And if we activate self,
  • 44:24we activate
  • 44:25so much of what matters
  • 44:27to students and so much
  • 44:29of what they're likely to
  • 44:30remember.
  • 44:32So and and make meaning.
  • 44:34This again, it's about making
  • 44:35meaning, and meaning
  • 44:37begin
  • 44:41self. Grace. Thank you for
  • 44:42that. Alright. Let me
  • 44:49final couple of slides here.
  • 44:53Some thoughts just some general
  • 44:55thoughts
  • 44:56on
  • 44:57cognition and skills. I remember
  • 44:58I mentioned this earlier
  • 45:01about the importance
  • 45:02of inferential reasoning ability.
  • 45:09And,
  • 45:12you know, we we are
  • 45:13currently working with, you know,
  • 45:16students teaching in or or
  • 45:19students who are learning
  • 45:20in workshops
  • 45:22and trying to encourage
  • 45:24more opportunities,
  • 45:26direct and clear opportunities
  • 45:28for students to do this
  • 45:29inferential
  • 45:30reasoning
  • 45:32to develop their inferential reasoning
  • 45:34ability,
  • 45:35not just
  • 45:36to gain
  • 45:37critical thinking skills, but true.
  • 45:40Not just to gain
  • 45:42interpersonal skills,
  • 45:44true.
  • 45:45But we know
  • 45:47that when ideas
  • 45:49are connected
  • 45:50to our ability to reason,
  • 45:54to make inferences,
  • 45:56when we know something well
  • 45:57enough
  • 45:58to make inferences about it
  • 46:00and other ideas, we really
  • 46:02know it. And so this
  • 46:04this process of learning in
  • 46:05workshops
  • 46:06and asking students
  • 46:08to do that
  • 46:10becomes more important than ever.
  • 46:14But before I do this,
  • 46:15I wanna I wanna say
  • 46:17one last thing, which is
  • 46:18this.
  • 46:20I I I observe a
  • 46:21lot of classes,
  • 46:22and I see all kinds
  • 46:23of teaching.
  • 46:24And if I
  • 46:25could make
  • 46:27one comment about that with
  • 46:28reference to this, it's this.
  • 46:30We often ask students what
  • 46:33questions.
  • 46:34We ask we ask them
  • 46:35a lot of fact questions.
  • 46:37And when we do that,
  • 46:39the most important thing we
  • 46:41can do
  • 46:42is to follow-up with how
  • 46:44did you come to that?
  • 46:46How did you come to
  • 46:48that?
  • 46:48That question
  • 46:51is essential
  • 46:52to help
  • 46:53students,
  • 46:54a,
  • 46:56practice inferential
  • 46:57reasoning ability,
  • 46:59b,
  • 47:00expose their thinking
  • 47:01to us so that we
  • 47:03can engage it.
  • 47:05How did you come to
  • 47:06that? And to develop metacognition.
  • 47:09How did I come to
  • 47:10that? How do I come
  • 47:11to conclusions?
  • 47:12And so with that,
  • 47:14I'm going
  • 47:15to say thank you very
  • 47:17much,
  • 47:18and I'm going to put
  • 47:20up We have a we
  • 47:21have a question.
  • 47:22Okay. Dana?
  • 47:24Well, this is excellent. It's
  • 47:26kind of a question and
  • 47:27a comment, but I think
  • 47:28your line of,
  • 47:30constructivism
  • 47:31begs the students
  • 47:34well founded, I think, students'
  • 47:35concern about the lack of
  • 47:38continuity
  • 47:39in teaching the workshops or
  • 47:41not the workshop, the workshop
  • 47:42potentially, but also the lectures
  • 47:44that, you know, teachers then,
  • 47:46can't activate prior knowledge if
  • 47:48they don't know what what
  • 47:49they know.
  • 47:51So I think it's, something
  • 47:52we need to grapple with.
  • 47:54Yeah. Thank you, Dana. I
  • 47:55think you're I think you're
  • 47:56a hundred percent right.
  • 47:59Do we have time for
  • 48:00another comment?
  • 48:01Yes. And
  • 48:02and you could put up
  • 48:03the, the Vowel slide if
  • 48:05you want while people are
  • 48:06doing that, but definitely time
  • 48:07for another comment. Bonnie, go
  • 48:09ahead.
  • 48:12I was just curious, like,
  • 48:13how much,
  • 48:14a need for a
  • 48:16particular concept,
  • 48:18in education paradigm is important.
  • 48:20Like, so we were actually
  • 48:21discussing our group, like, if
  • 48:22a student need that particular
  • 48:24concept,
  • 48:25even if it is outside
  • 48:27their current learning, knowledge fair,
  • 48:29they will try to
  • 48:30integrate that within the within
  • 48:32their knowledge.
  • 48:33If not, they will just
  • 48:34leave it. Like, I was
  • 48:35giving an example where genetics
  • 48:37course for medical students, they
  • 48:39will not consider that as
  • 48:40a necessary course for their
  • 48:42survival in medical,
  • 48:44sphere.
  • 48:45So probably they will take
  • 48:46it passively rather than actively.
  • 48:48So what do you think
  • 48:49about that, like, necessity of
  • 48:51a knowledge?
  • 48:53Well, you know, some of
  • 48:54the knowledge that students learn
  • 48:56in class, they don't integrate
  • 48:57deeply right away.
  • 48:59Hopefully, they hold onto it.
  • 49:01And in another setting, like
  • 49:03a workshop or something or
  • 49:04down the road or when
  • 49:06they hit the floors,
  • 49:09that information becomes activated and
  • 49:11integrated.
  • 49:12The the the There is
  • 49:13a space where you can
  • 49:14keep it? Like Yes. Of
  • 49:16course. Yes. Yeah. There is.
  • 49:18There is. Now it might
  • 49:19flow. It might kinda fly
  • 49:21away. It might not be
  • 49:22kept close enough to be
  • 49:25collected again.
  • 49:26But no. Stuff a a
  • 49:28lot we have a lot
  • 49:29of stuff
  • 49:30in our minds
  • 49:31that
  • 49:32we haven't fully integrated and
  • 49:34therefore can't fully use, but
  • 49:36it doesn't mean
  • 49:37we don't I mean, there's
  • 49:39a classic example,
  • 49:42that I remember, an economist
  • 49:44economist professor once said,
  • 49:47and he would be giving
  • 49:47this complex
  • 49:49lecture on game theory, and
  • 49:51all the students are going
  • 49:52like this.
  • 49:54They're all nodding. And you
  • 49:56know what that is? That's
  • 49:57called recognition.
  • 49:58That makes sense. That makes
  • 50:00sense. That makes sense. It
  • 50:01doesn't mean they know it.
  • 50:02And in fact, then when
  • 50:04they take the test, they
  • 50:05don't know it. But but
  • 50:06what's happening is the knowledge
  • 50:08is bouncing up against things
  • 50:10that we kinda recognize.
  • 50:12They're not really engaged, but
  • 50:13we recognize,
  • 50:15you know, at a at
  • 50:15a at a superficial level.
  • 50:17Yeah. That makes sense.
  • 50:19But it's not deep learning.
  • 50:24Any others?
  • 50:26Well, this was terrific, Bill.
  • 50:28It it really pushes us
  • 50:30to think about what we
  • 50:31can do to really promote
  • 50:32learning with with our students
  • 50:34across
  • 50:35undergraduate,
  • 50:36our residents, our fellows, and
  • 50:37our faculty. So thank you
  • 50:39so much
  • 50:40for kicking off the season.
  • 50:42You're welcome. And as I
  • 50:43said before, anyone who wants
  • 50:45to continue this con conversation
  • 50:47further or
  • 50:48experiment with something in your
  • 50:50class, please don't hesitate to
  • 50:51contact me. I love those
  • 50:53kinds of experiments.
  • 50:57Bye, everyone.
  • 50:58Bye, everyone.