2020
Diagnosing Anal Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions With and Without p16: An Interobserver Variability Study.
Krishnamurti U, Mohammad M, Monsrud A, Mosunjac M, Oprea G, Hanley K, Tadros T, Flowers L, Mosunjac M. Diagnosing Anal Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions With and Without p16: An Interobserver Variability Study. Journal Of Lower Genital Tract Disease 2020, 24: 69-74. PMID: 31860579, DOI: 10.1097/lgt.0000000000000500.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2017
Cytologic predictors of malignancy in bile duct brushings: a multi-reviewer analysis of 60 cases
Avadhani V, Hacihasanoglu E, Memis B, Pehlivanoglu B, Hanley K, Krishnamurti U, Krasinskas A, Osunkoya A, Daniels L, Freedman A, Goodman M, Adsay V, Reid M. Cytologic predictors of malignancy in bile duct brushings: a multi-reviewer analysis of 60 cases. Modern Pathology 2017, 30: 1273-1286. PMID: 28664934, DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.51.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2006
The “Big Dog” Effect: Variability Assessing the Causes of Error in Diagnoses of Patients With Lung Cancer
Raab S, Meier F, Zarbo R, Jensen D, Geisinger K, Booth C, Krishnamurti U, Stone C, Janosky J, Grzybicki D. The “Big Dog” Effect: Variability Assessing the Causes of Error in Diagnoses of Patients With Lung Cancer. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2006, 24: 2808-2814. PMID: 16782918, DOI: 10.1200/jco.2005.04.3661.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsBronchiDiagnostic ErrorsFalse Negative ReactionsHumansLungLung NeoplasmsObserver VariationConceptsKappa statisticsQuality improvement interventionsDiagnosis of patientsFalse-negative diagnosesInstitutional pathologistsLung massSurgical specimenLung cancerPathology specimenPulmonary specimensReview diagnosisSlide reviewPatientsImprovement interventionsOriginal diagnosisInter-pathologist agreementPsychosocial hypothesesClinical samplingDiagnosisInterobserver agreementCancer diagnosisDiagnostic samplesInitial assessmentSame institutionDiagnostic errors