2024
Identity Theft, Deep Brain Stimulation, and the Primacy of Post‐trial Obligations
Fins J, Merner A, Wright M, Lázaro-Muñoz G. Identity Theft, Deep Brain Stimulation, and the Primacy of Post‐trial Obligations. The Hastings Center Report 2024, 54: 34-41. PMID: 38390681, PMCID: PMC11022755, DOI: 10.1002/hast.1567.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2023
COVID-19 and Clinical Ethics
Fins J. COVID-19 and Clinical Ethics. 2023, 17-27. DOI: 10.1017/9781009265690.004.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMinding Rights: Mapping Ethical and Legal Foundations of 'Neurorights'.
Ligthart S, Ienca M, Meynen G, Molnar-Gabor F, Andorno R, Bublitz C, Catley P, Claydon L, Douglas T, Farahany N, Fins J, Goering S, Haselager P, Jotterand F, Lavazza A, McCay A, Wajnerman Paz A, Rainey S, Ryberg J, Kellmeyer P. Minding Rights: Mapping Ethical and Legal Foundations of 'Neurorights'. Cambridge Quarterly Of Healthcare Ethics 2023, 32: 1-21. PMID: 37183686, DOI: 10.1017/s0963180123000245.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLegal foundationsCognitive libertyMental integrityMental privacyConstitutional legal frameworkCouncil of EuropePolicy discussionsLegal interpretationLegal frameworkInternational institutionsEthical frames of referenceInternational policiesNeurorightsLibertyEthical framePhilosophical assumptionsPolicyFrame of referenceGovernment guidelinesPrivacyLegalityCouncilDiscussionFoundationsActive interest
2020
The Neglect of Persons with Severe Brain Injury in the United States: An International Human Rights Analysis.
Ezer T, Wright M, Fins J. The Neglect of Persons with Severe Brain Injury in the United States: An International Human Rights Analysis. Health And Human Rights 2020, 22: 265-278. PMID: 32669806, PMCID: PMC7348445.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHuman rights analysisFreedom of expressionBlock to treatmentUnited StatesRights analysisLife of personsExperiences of personsTraumatic incidentsQuality of life of personsPersonsScientific progressNeglectMedical advancesBrain injuryInadequate accessLawViolationStateSignificant medical advancesFreedomEqualityInstitutionalizationUnitsInternationalPolicy
2000
Assisted suicide compared with refusal of treatment: a valid distinction? University of Pennsylvania Center for Bioethics Assisted Suicide Consensus Panel.
Miller F, Fins J, Snyder L. Assisted suicide compared with refusal of treatment: a valid distinction? University of Pennsylvania Center for Bioethics Assisted Suicide Consensus Panel. Annals Of Internal Medicine 2000, 132: 470-5. PMID: 10733447, DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-132-6-200003210-00008.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAssisted suicideRefusal of treatmentIssue of physician-assisted suicideRefusal of life-sustaining treatmentPhysician-assisted suicideLife-sustaining treatmentWithdrawal of treatmentArtificial nutritionContinuing debatePolicy hingesRefusalSuicideEthicsArgumentsDebatesIssuesPracticePolicyConfusion