2024
Utilization and timing of surgical intervention for central cord syndrome in the United States
Dhodapkar M, Halperin S, Seddio A, Dahodwala T, Rubio D, Grauer J. Utilization and timing of surgical intervention for central cord syndrome in the United States. European Spine Journal 2024, 33: 3645-3651. PMID: 39103615, DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08431-2.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCentral cord syndromeSurgical interventionAbsence of bony injuryOperative interventionCord syndromeBony injuriesPredictors of operative managementAbsence of vertebral fracturesTiming of surgical interventionTiming of operative interventionCohort of patientsProportion of patientsDays of diagnosisHigher comorbidity burdenVertebral fracturesSpinal cord injuryMethodsAdult patientsNon-operativelyNonsurgical interventionsMultivariate analysisStudy assessed utilizationComorbidity burdenIncomplete spinal cord injuryPatientsInclusion criteria
2015
Analysis of Delays to Surgery for Cervical Spinal Cord Injuries
Samuel AM, Bohl DD, Basques BA, Diaz-Collado PJ, Lukasiewicz AM, Webb ML, Grauer JN. Analysis of Delays to Surgery for Cervical Spinal Cord Injuries. Spine 2015, 40: 992-1000. PMID: 25785963, DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000000883.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCervical VertebraeChi-Square DistributionComorbidityDatabases, FactualDecompression, SurgicalFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPatient AdmissionRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSpinal Cord InjuriesTime FactorsTime-to-TreatmentTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultConceptsCervical spinal cord injuryIncomplete spinal cord injurySpinal cord injuryNational Trauma Data Bank Research Data SetCentral spinal cord injuryComplete spinal cord injuryLate surgeryCord injuryUpper cervical spinal cord injuryGreater Charlson Comorbidity IndexSuperior neurological outcomeCharlson Comorbidity IndexMajority of patientsComorbidity indexNeurological outcomeUnderwent surgerySurgical timingInjury characteristicsRetrospective studyEmergency departmentInpatient admissionsPatient populationSurgery occurBACKGROUND DATAPatients
2009
Differences between neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons in classifying cervical dislocation injuries and making assessment and treatment decisions: a multicenter reliability study.
Arnold PM, Brodke DS, Rampersaud YR, Harrop JS, Dailey AT, Shaffrey CI, Grauer JN, Dvorak MF, Bono CM, Wilsey JT, Lee JY, Nassr A, Vaccaro AR. Differences between neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons in classifying cervical dislocation injuries and making assessment and treatment decisions: a multicenter reliability study. The American Journal Of Orthopedics 2009, 38: e156-61. PMID: 20011745.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSpinal cord injuryMagnetic resonance imagingPretreatment magnetic resonance imagingCervical dislocation injuriesDislocation injuriesSpine surgeonsIncomplete spinal cord injuryComplete spinal cord injuryCervical spinal injuryBilateral facet dislocationImmediate closed reductionMulticenter reliability studyIntact patientsCervical injuryClosed reductionFacet dislocationCord injurySpinal injuryTreatment decisionsCervical dislocationTherapeutic implicationsClinical scenariosOrthopaedic surgeonsInjuryResonance imaging