2019
TCT-763 Valve in Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Real World Outcomes From the National Inpatient Sample (2013–2016)
Kim G, Geirsson A, Cleman M, Forrest J, Kaple R. TCT-763 Valve in Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Real World Outcomes From the National Inpatient Sample (2013–2016). Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2019, 74: b748. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.08.902.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2015
Impact of Hospital Volume on Outcomes of Endovascular Stenting for Adult Aortic Coarctation
Bhatt P, Patel NJ, Patel A, Sonani R, Patel A, Panaich SS, Thakkar B, Savani C, Jhamnani S, Patel N, Patel N, Pant S, Patel S, Arora S, Dave A, Singh V, Chothani A, Patel J, Ansari M, Deshmukh A, Bhimani R, Grines C, Cleman M, Mangi A, Forrest JK, Badheka AO. Impact of Hospital Volume on Outcomes of Endovascular Stenting for Adult Aortic Coarctation. The American Journal Of Cardiology 2015, 116: 1418-1424. PMID: 26471501, DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.07.066.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLength of stayAnnual hospital volumeShorter LOSNationwide Inpatient Sample databaseHospital volumeProcedure-related complicationsEndovascular stentingNinth RevisionInternational ClassificationUtilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample databaseClinical Modification procedure codesAdult aortic coarctationUnique hospital identifiersNationwide Inpatient SampleTreatment of coarctationMultivariate regression analysisComposite outcomeHighest tertileInhospital deathAortic coarctationRetrospective studyInpatient SampleStent placementLower incidenceIdentified subjectsMechanical Circulatory Support Devices and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (from the National Inpatient Sample)
Singh V, Patel SV, Savani C, Patel NJ, Patel N, Arora S, Panaich SS, Deshmukh A, Cleman M, Mangi A, Forrest JK, Badheka AO. Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (from the National Inpatient Sample). The American Journal Of Cardiology 2015, 116: 1574-1580. PMID: 26434512, DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.08.020.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTranscatheter aortic valve implantationMechanical circulatory support devicesAortic valve implantationCirculatory support devicesMCS devicesValve implantationHigh-risk surgical patientsPropensity score-matched analysisClinical Modification procedure codesSupport devicesVentricular fibrillation arrestNationwide Inpatient SampleCost of hospitalizationShort-term useSignificant increaseUnacceptably high ratesInhospital mortalityInhospital outcomesCardiogenic shockIndependent predictorsSurgical patientsNinth RevisionTAVI procedureTransapical accessInpatient SampleTrends of Hospitalizations in the United States from 2000 to 2012 of Patients >60 Years With Aortic Valve Disease
Badheka AO, Singh V, Patel NJ, Arora S, Patel N, Thakkar B, Jhamnani S, Pant S, Chothani A, Macon C, Panaich SS, Patel J, Manvar S, Savani C, Bhatt P, Panchal V, Patel N, Patel A, Patel D, Lahewala S, Deshmukh A, Mohamad T, Mangi AA, Cleman M, Forrest JK. Trends of Hospitalizations in the United States from 2000 to 2012 of Patients >60 Years With Aortic Valve Disease. The American Journal Of Cardiology 2015, 116: 132-141. PMID: 25983278, DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.03.053.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAortic valve diseaseCost of hospitalizationInhospital mortalityHeart failureValve diseaseHigh burdenEconomic burdenFrequent coexisting conditionsOverall inhospital mortalitySubgroup of patientsValvular heart diseaseInnovative therapeutic optionsNationwide Inpatient SamplePrincipal discharge diagnosisNumber of hospitalizationsTrend of hospitalizationsPublic health systemRenal failureAortic stenosisDischarge diagnosisNinth RevisionTherapeutic optionsPatient populationInpatient SampleCoexisting conditions