2013
Attitude–goal correspondence and interracial interaction: Implications for executive function and impression formation
Pearson A, Dovidio J, Phills C, Onyeador I. Attitude–goal correspondence and interracial interaction: Implications for executive function and impression formation. Journal Of Experimental Social Psychology 2013, 49: 907-914. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.015.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchInterracial interactionsBlack confederateNegative emotional expressionsImplicit racial attitudesIntergroup biasStroop taskCognitive depletionEmotional expressionExecutive functionImpression formationIntergroup interactionsObservers' impressionsRacial attitudesNegative impressionsOpposite patternConfederateSubsequent performancePresent researchRegulatory goalsImpressionDepletion effectImplicationsTaskPromptsAttitudesAccuracy and Bias in Perceptions of Relationship Interest for Intergroup and Intragroup Roommates
West T, Dovidio J, Pearson A. Accuracy and Bias in Perceptions of Relationship Interest for Intergroup and Intragroup Roommates. Social Psychological And Personality Science 2013, 5: 235-242. DOI: 10.1177/1948550613490966.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchRelationship interestCross-group friendshipsSame-race dyadsDirectional biasCross-race dyadsPerception of anxietyPresent longitudinal studyCross-race relationshipsPartner's anxietyPerceptual dynamicsIntergroup interactionsDyad typesAnxietyRelationship formationRelationship developmentLongitudinal studyPrevious researchPartner interestDyadsPerceptionTypes of processesDifferent races/ethnicitiesRoommatesBiasIntergroupIntergroup Relations and Health Disparities: A Social Psychological Perspective
Major B, Mendes W, Dovidio J. Intergroup Relations and Health Disparities: A Social Psychological Perspective. Health Psychology 2013, 32: 514-524. PMID: 23646834, PMCID: PMC3988903, DOI: 10.1037/a0030358.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLow-status groupsSocial psychological perspectiveSocial psychological theoriesIntergroup processesPsychological theoriesIntergroup relationsPsychological perspectiveSocial identity threatStatus groupsHigh-status groupsDifferent health behaviorsPrejudice concernsIntrapersonal processesSocial psychologyIdentity threatIndividual differencesSocial categorizationIntergroup interactionsGroup differencesGroup relationsFuture researchResearch identifiesAcute stressGroup disparitiesHealth behaviors
2012
Social Conflict, Harmony, and Integration
Dovidio J, Gaertner S, Mayville E, Perry S. Social Conflict, Harmony, and Integration. 2012 DOI: 10.1002/9781118133880.hop205020.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchIntergroup biasSocial psychological studiesSocial integrationIntergroup attitudesPsychological processesIntergroup relationsIntergroup interactionsPsychological basisPsychological studiesTheoretical implicationsSocial conflictTheoretical emphasisSocial processesConflictBrief historical overviewIndividual membersBiasGreater understandingDifferent processesAttitudesDifferent groupsInterventionImplicationsChapterIntegrationIntergroup Relations in Post‐Conflict Contexts
Dovidio J, Gaertner S, Ditlmann R, West T. Intergroup Relations in Post‐Conflict Contexts. 2012, 135-155. DOI: 10.1002/9781118347683.ch8.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchDivergent Intergroup Perspectives
Dovidio J, Saguy T, West T, Gaertner S. Divergent Intergroup Perspectives. 2012, 158-176. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199747672.013.0010.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchIntergroup perspectiveIntergroup relationsIntergroup interactionsPsychological basisPsychological interventionsDifferent social categoriesInitial biasesSocial categoriesWay peopleGroup perspectiveDifferent goalsMutual understandingConflictPerceptionPerspectiveBiasesBehaviorAbstract InteractionsDifferent groupsMiscommunicationInterventionExpectationsPeopleMembershipMembers
2008
The Fragility of Intergroup Relations
Pearson A, West T, Dovidio J, Powers S, Buck R, Henning R. The Fragility of Intergroup Relations. Psychological Science 2008, 19: 1272-1279. PMID: 19121137, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02236.x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsIntergroup contactIntergroup interactionsPositive intergroup contactIntergroup relationsIntergroup communicationGreater anxietyDyadic conversationsLess anxietyDelay conditionsTemporal disruptionReal-time conversationsAnxietyPractical implicationsEthnic majorityAudiovisual feedbackLatino participantsDyadsSocial dynamicsConversationMinority groupsLess interestDisengagementIntergroupParticipantsDynamic process
2007
Another view of “we”: Majority and minority group perspectives on a common ingroup identity
Dovidio J, Gaertner S, Saguy T. Another view of “we”: Majority and minority group perspectives on a common ingroup identity. European Review Of Social Psychology 2007, 18: 296-330. DOI: 10.1080/10463280701726132.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCommon ingroup identity modelCommon ingroup identityMinority group perspectivesIntergroup biasesIngroup identityIntergroup interactionsIdentity modelSocial categorisationGroup perspectiveRecent researchDifferent preferencesMinority groupsPotential implicationsSocial changeRecategorisationPrejudiceDifferent formsBiasesResearchSelfIdentityPreferencesInitial formulationDiscriminationImplications
1993
The Common Ingroup Identity Model: Recategorization and the Reduction of Intergroup Bias
Gaertner S, Dovidio J, Anastasio P, Bachman B, Rust M. The Common Ingroup Identity Model: Recategorization and the Reduction of Intergroup Bias. European Review Of Social Psychology 1993, 4: 1-26. DOI: 10.1080/14792779343000004.Peer-Reviewed Original Research