2023
Targeted social marketing of PrEP and the stigmatization of black sexual minority men
Calabrese S, Kalwicz D, Dovidio J, Rao S, Modrakovic D, Boone C, Magnus M, Kharfen M, Patel V, Zea M. Targeted social marketing of PrEP and the stigmatization of black sexual minority men. PLOS ONE 2023, 18: e0285329. PMID: 37167318, PMCID: PMC10174512, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285329.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsBlack sexual minority menSexual minority menFocus group participantsPrEP stigmaGroup participantsSubject comparisonsMinority menLongitudinal online surveyHIV incidenceGroup comparisonsPrEPMore stigmatizingParticipantsMenFocus groupsMinimal effectStigmaGroupTargeted Social MarketingOnline surveyHIVInteraction effectsSocial marketingSocial marketing initiatives
2016
Help that hurts? Perceptions of intergroup assistance
Halabi S, Dovidio J, Nadler A. Help that hurts? Perceptions of intergroup assistance. International Journal Of Intercultural Relations 2016, 53: 65-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2016.05.007.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLow-status groupsIntergroup relationsStatus Relations ModelStatus groupsIntergroup HelpingOffers of helpJewish participantsConciliatory actionsIsraeli JewsRelation modelIsraeli ArabsCurrent researchDifferent perspectivesHelpingPerceptionHigh groupParticipantsConflictRelationHelpGroupResearchHypothesisMembersMisunderstanding
2015
Prosocial Behavior and Empathy
Dovidio J, Banfield J. Prosocial Behavior and Empathy. 2015, 216-220. DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.24024-5.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2009
Promoting Reconciliation Through the Satisfaction of the Emotional Needs of Victimized and Perpetrating Group Members: The Needs-Based Model of Reconciliation
Shnabel N, Nadler A, Ullrich J, Dovidio J, Carmi D. Promoting Reconciliation Through the Satisfaction of the Emotional Needs of Victimized and Perpetrating Group Members: The Needs-Based Model of Reconciliation. Personality And Social Psychology Bulletin 2009, 35: 1021-1030. PMID: 19498070, DOI: 10.1177/0146167209336610.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSocial exchange interactionsModel of reconciliationNeeds-based modelOne's ingroupPerpetrator groupTheoretical implicationsEmotional needsParties' willingnessIngroupGreater willingnessGroup membersPerpetratorsVictimsWillingnessVictimizedSatisfactionReconciliationImplicationsMembersEmpowermentGroupAcceptanceOpposite effectNeed
1999
Reducing Prejudice
Dovidio J, Gaertner S. Reducing Prejudice. Current Directions In Psychological Science 1999, 8: 101-105. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8721.00024.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchIntergroup contactBasis of prejudiceNegative emotional statesIntergroup strategiesEmotional statesContemporary prejudiceIndividualized perceptionsGroup boundariesPrejudiceIntentional formsFavorable attitudesSuch inconsistenciesContemporary formsPerceptionAttitudesDifferent groupsIndividualsInconsistenciesTraditional formsInterventionPeopleRepresentationGroupMembersStrategies
1997
Extending the Benefits of Recategorization: Evaluations, Self-Disclosure, and Helping
Dovidio J, Gaertner S, Validzic A, Matoka K, Johnson B, Frazier S. Extending the Benefits of Recategorization: Evaluations, Self-Disclosure, and Helping. Journal Of Experimental Social Psychology 1997, 33: 401-420. PMID: 9247370, DOI: 10.1006/jesp.1997.1327.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchIntergroup biasCommon ingroup identity modelIntergroup contact situationsOne-group representationThree-person groupsIntergroup behaviorEvaluative biasIdentity modelSelf-DisclosureGroup membersRecategorizationPresent researchStrong impressionParticipantsBiasContact situationsSeparate groupsRepresentationFavoritismSingle groupRatingsDifferent groupsImpressionMembersGroup
1995
Group Representations and Intergroup Bias: Positive Affect, Similarity, and Group Size
Dovidio J, Gaertner S, Isen A, Lowrance R. Group Representations and Intergroup Bias: Positive Affect, Similarity, and Group Size. Personality And Social Psychology Bulletin 1995, 21: 856-865. DOI: 10.1177/0146167295218009.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchIntergroup biasPositive affectOut-group evaluationGroup identity modelIntergroup relationsSocial categorizationAffective factorsApplied implicationsIdentity modelSuperordinate groupAffectSocial representationsRepresentationGroup representationsBiasLow levelsCategorizationGroup sizeImplicationsSubjectsMembershipGroup
1990
How Does Cooperation Reduce Intergroup Bias?
Gaertner S, Mann J, Dovidio J, Murrell A, Pomare M. How Does Cooperation Reduce Intergroup Bias? Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology 1990, 59: 692-704. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.59.4.692.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchIntergroup cooperationCognitive representationsFormer outgroup membersSocial categorization perspectiveMultiple regression mediation analysesRegression mediation analysisIntergroup biasIntergroup contactOutgroup membersMediation analysisMember representationSsRepresentationBiasAbsence of cooperationParticipantsCooperationAttractivenessGroupHypothesisPerspective
1989
Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Benefits of Recategorization
Gaertner S, Mann J, Murrell A, Dovidio J. Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Benefits of Recategorization. Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology 1989, 57: 239-249. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.2.239.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchSelf-categorization theoryIntergroup biasConceptual representationControl conditionOut-group membersIn-group membersGroup boundariesRecategorizationOne-groupSeparate individualsCategorization approachBiasRepresentationSmall groupAttractivenessDifferent waysUndergraduatesIndividualsImplicationsMembershipMembersFindingsGroupStrategiesTheory