Quantifying treatment selection bias effect on survival in comparative effectiveness research: findings from low-risk prostate cancer patients
Miccio JA, Talcott WJ, Jairam V, Park HS, Yu JB, Leapman MS, Johnson SB, King MT, Nguyen PL, Kann BH. Quantifying treatment selection bias effect on survival in comparative effectiveness research: findings from low-risk prostate cancer patients. Prostate Cancer And Prostatic Diseases 2020, 24: 414-422. PMID: 32989262, DOI: 10.1038/s41391-020-00291-3.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsProstate cancer-specific survivalLow-risk prostate cancerExternal beam radiotherapyTreatment selection biasOverall survivalRadical prostatectomyProstate cancerOS differenceLow-risk prostate cancer patientsCancer-specific survivalEnd Results (SEER) databaseProstate cancer patientsClinical trial designEffectiveness researchComparative effectiveness researchPropensity-score matchingMethodsThe SurveillanceTreatment guidelinesResults databaseEntire cohortResultsA totalCancer patientsTreatment modalitiesNational registryPatient managementResident attitudes and benefits of mock oral board examinations in radiation oncology
Peters GW, Decker RH, Park HS, Yu JB, Evans SB. Resident attitudes and benefits of mock oral board examinations in radiation oncology. BMC Medical Education 2020, 20: 203. PMID: 32586357, PMCID: PMC7318518, DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-02106-4.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPost-intervention surveysMock oral board examinationsOral board examinationImproved resident confidenceMore disease sitesPost-graduate year 3Pre-intervention surveyClinical domainsPost-intervention scoresSelf-reported comfortResultsA totalBoard examinationDisease sitesOncology training programsDose parametersRadiation oncologyResident confidenceClinical knowledgeT-testAmerican BoardMixed-methods surveyYear 3ExaminationUnanimous requestClinical reasoning