2024
Intravascular Imaging–Guided Versus Angiography‐Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Trials
Sreenivasan J, Reddy R, Jamil Y, Malik A, Chamie D, Howard J, Nanna M, Mintz G, Maehara A, Ali Z, Moses J, Chen S, Chieffo A, Colombo A, Leon M, Lansky A, Ahmad Y. Intravascular Imaging–Guided Versus Angiography‐Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Trials. Journal Of The American Heart Association 2024, 13: e031111. PMID: 38214263, PMCID: PMC10926835, DOI: 10.1161/jaha.123.031111.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAdverse cardiac eventsPercutaneous coronary interventionAngiography-guided percutaneous coronary interventionTarget vessel revascularizationTarget-lesion revascularizationCardiac eventsCardiac deathImaging-guided percutaneous coronary interventionWeighted mean follow-up durationMeta-analysisPrimary outcomeMean follow-up durationStent thrombosisMeta-analysis of randomized trialsStudy-level meta-analysisComplex lesion subsetsIntravascular imagingAll-cause deathRandom-effects meta-analysisStandard of careIntention-to-treat principleUpdates of clinical guidelinesMixed-effects meta-regressionComplex percutaneous coronary interventionIntravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention
2021
Performance of quantitative flow ratio in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Sejr‐Hansen M, Christiansen EH, Ahmad Y, Vendrik J, Westra J, Holm NR, Thim T, Seligman H, Hall K, Sen S, Terkelsen CJ, Eftekhari A. Performance of quantitative flow ratio in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheterization And Cardiovascular Interventions 2021, 99: 68-73. PMID: 33533535, DOI: 10.1002/ccd.29518.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTranscatheter aortic valve implantationAortic valve stenosisCoronary artery diseaseInstantaneous wave-free ratioFractional flow reserveQuantitative flow ratioAortic valve implantationValve implantationDiagnostic performancePressure wirePresence of ASSevere aortic valve stenosisAortic valve replacementCoronary pressure wireGood diagnostic performanceValve replacementAortic stenosisArtery diseaseValve stenosisCoronary angiogramFlow reservePatientsCAD evaluationDiagnostic accuracyStenosisIntravascular Ultrasound in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Solving Ambiguity and Improving Durability
Prasad M, Maehara A, Ahmad Y, Jeremias A, Shlofmitz E, Kirtane AJ, Moses JW, Fall KN, Mintz GS, Karmpaliotis D, Ali ZA. Intravascular Ultrasound in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Solving Ambiguity and Improving Durability. Interventional Cardiology Clinics 2021, 10: 75-85. PMID: 33223109, DOI: 10.1016/j.iccl.2020.09.006.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsCoronary AngiographyCoronary OcclusionHumansPercutaneous Coronary InterventionTreatment OutcomeUltrasonography, Interventional
2020
Difference in functional assessment of individual stenosis severity in serial coronary lesions between resting and hyperemic pressure-wire pullback: Insights from the GIFT registry
Warisawa T, Howard JP, Kawase Y, Tanigaki T, Omori H, Cook CM, Ahmad Y, Francis DP, Akashi YJ, Matsuo H, Davies JE. Difference in functional assessment of individual stenosis severity in serial coronary lesions between resting and hyperemic pressure-wire pullback: Insights from the GIFT registry. International Journal Of Cardiology 2020, 312: 10-15. PMID: 32376416, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.05.001.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsFractional flow reserveInstantaneous wave-free ratioCoronary lesionsPressure-wire pullbackCoronary artery lesionsPhysiological assessmentArtery lesionsConsecutive patientsCoronary stenosisHemodynamic significanceWave-free periodFlow reserveHemodynamic interactionSerial lesionsSerial stenosesFunctional assessmentStenosis severityLesionsStenosisHyperemic conditionsStatistical differenceWhole cardiac cycleReference standardCardiac cyclePredominance
2019
Clinical Events After Deferral of LAD Revascularization Following Physiological Coronary Assessment
Sen S, Ahmad Y, Dehbi HM, Howard JP, Iglesias JF, Al-Lamee R, Petraco R, Nijjer S, Bhindi R, Lehman S, Walters D, Sapontis J, Janssens L, Vrints CJ, Khashaba A, Laine M, Van Belle E, Krackhardt F, Bojara W, Going O, Härle T, Indolfi C, Niccoli G, Ribichini F, Tanaka N, Yokoi H, Takashima H, Kikuta Y, Erglis A, Vinhas H, Silva PC, Baptista SB, Alghamdi A, Hellig F, Koo BK, Nam CW, Shin ES, Doh JH, Brugaletta S, Alegria-Barrero E, Meuwissen M, Piek JJ, van Royen N, Sezer M, Di Mario C, Gerber RT, Malik IS, Sharp ASP, Talwar S, Tang K, Samady H, Altman J, Seto AH, Singh J, Jeremias A, Matsuo H, Kharbanda RK, Patel MR, Serruys P, Escaned J, Davies JE. Clinical Events After Deferral of LAD Revascularization Following Physiological Coronary Assessment. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2019, 73: 444-453. PMID: 30704577, PMCID: PMC6354033, DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.070.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedCoronary AngiographyCoronary StenosisCoronary VesselsFemaleFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial RevascularizationConceptsMajor adverse cardiac eventsInstantaneous wave-free ratioFractional flow reserveLAD lesionsMyocardial infarctionUnplanned revascularizationLeft anterior descending (LAD) arteryEvent ratesLower myocardial infarctionAdverse cardiac eventsAnterior descending (LAD) arteryPhysiological assessmentLow event ratesMACE rateCardiac eventsCardiovascular deathClinical eventsFlow reserveHigh riskPatientsLesionsLADRevascularizationTrialsTreatment
2018
Fractional Flow Reserve and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio as Predictors of the Placebo-Controlled Response to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Stable Single-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease: Physiology-Stratified Analysis of ORBITA
Al-Lamee R, Howard JP, Shun-Shin MJ, Thompson D, Dehbi HM, Sen S, Nijjer S, Petraco R, Davies J, Keeble T, Tang K, Malik IS, Cook C, Ahmad Y, Sharp ASP, Gerber R, Baker C, Kaprielian R, Talwar S, Assomull R, Cole G, Keenan NG, Kanaganayagam G, Sehmi J, Wensel R, Harrell FE, Mayet J, Thom SA, Davies JE, Francis DP. Fractional Flow Reserve and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio as Predictors of the Placebo-Controlled Response to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Stable Single-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease: Physiology-Stratified Analysis of ORBITA. Circulation 2018, 138: circulationaha.118.033801. PMID: 29789302, DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.118.033801.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdrenergic beta-1 Receptor AgonistsAgedAngina, StableCardiac CatheterizationCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary StenosisDobutamineEchocardiography, StressExercise TestExercise ToleranceFemaleFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialHealth StatusHumansMaleMiddle AgedPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPredictive Value of TestsProgression-Free SurvivalQuality of LifeRecovery of FunctionSeverity of Illness IndexTime FactorsUnited KingdomConceptsPercutaneous coronary interventionInstantaneous wave-free ratioFractional flow reserveSingle-vessel coronary artery diseaseTreadmill exercise timeCoronary artery diseaseExercise timeEchocardiography scoreStable anginaCoronary interventionArtery diseaseFlow reserveCanadian Cardiovascular Society class IIEffect of PCISevere single-vessel diseaseSingle-vessel coronary diseaseMean fractional flow reserveAngina frequency scorePlacebo-controlled effectsPlacebo-controlled efficacyPlacebo-controlled trialTotal exercise timeSingle-vessel diseaseAngina severityEchocardiographic improvement
2017
Fractional Flow Reserve/Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Discordance in Angiographically Intermediate Coronary Stenoses An Analysis Using Doppler-Derived Coronary Flow Measurements
Cook CM, Jeremias A, Petraco R, Sen S, Nijjer S, Shun-Shin MJ, Ahmad Y, de Waard G, van de Hoef T, Echavarria-Pinto M, van Lavieren M, Lamee R, Kikuta Y, Shiono Y, Buch A, Meuwissen M, Danad I, Knaapen P, Maehara A, Koo BK, Mintz GS, Escaned J, Stone GW, Francis DP, Mayet J, Piek JJ, van Royen N, Davies JE. Fractional Flow Reserve/Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Discordance in Angiographically Intermediate Coronary Stenoses An Analysis Using Doppler-Derived Coronary Flow Measurements. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions 2017, 10: 2514-2524. PMID: 29268881, PMCID: PMC5743106, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.09.021.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAgedBlood Flow VelocityCardiac CatheterizationCoronary AngiographyCoronary StenosisCoronary VesselsDatabases, FactualEchocardiography, DopplerFemaleFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialHumansHyperemiaMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexPercutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina (ORBITA): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial
Al-Lamee R, Thompson D, Dehbi HM, Sen S, Tang K, Davies J, Keeble T, Mielewczik M, Kaprielian R, Malik IS, Nijjer SS, Petraco R, Cook C, Ahmad Y, Howard J, Baker C, Sharp A, Gerber R, Talwar S, Assomull R, Mayet J, Wensel R, Collier D, Shun-Shin M, Thom SA, Davies JE, Francis DP, investigators O, Al-Lamee R, Thompson D, Sen S, Tang K, Davies J, Keeble T, Kaprielian R, Malik I, Nijjer S, Petraco R, Cook C, Ahmad Y, Howard J, Shun-Shin M, Sethi A, Baker C, Sharp A, Ramrakha P, Gerber R, Talwar S, Assomull R, Foale R, Mayet J, Wensel R, Thom S, Davies J, Francis D, Khamis R, Hadjiloizou N, Khan M, Kooner J, Bellamy M, Mikhail G, Clifford P, O'Kane P, Levy T, Swallow R. Percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina (ORBITA): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 2017, 391: 31-40. PMID: 29103656, DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32714-9.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPercutaneous coronary interventionPlacebo procedureExercise timeBiomedical Research CentrePlacebo groupPrimary endpointStable anginaCoronary interventionTrials of PCISingle-vessel stenosisMajor bleeding eventsSerious adverse eventsCardiopulmonary exercise testingDobutamine stress echocardiographySevere coronary stenosisInstantaneous wave-free ratioFractional flow reserveBleeding eventsPCI groupIschemic symptomsAdverse eventsExercise testingMedication optimizationAngina reliefRelated complications