2023
Physiology-guided PCI versus CABG for left main coronary artery disease: insights from the DEFINE-LM registry
Warisawa T, Cook C, Kawase Y, Howard J, Ahmad Y, Seligman H, Rajkumar C, Toya T, Doi S, Nakajima A, Tanigaki T, Omori H, Nakayama M, Vera-Urquiza R, Yuasa S, Sato T, Kikuta Y, Nishina H, Al-Lamee R, Sen S, Lerman A, Akashi Y, Escaned J, Matsuo H, Davies J. Physiology-guided PCI versus CABG for left main coronary artery disease: insights from the DEFINE-LM registry. Cardiovascular Intervention And Therapeutics 2023, 38: 287-298. PMID: 37017899, PMCID: PMC10247826, DOI: 10.1007/s12928-023-00932-z.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsUnprotected left main coronary diseasePercutaneous coronary interventionInstantaneous wave-free ratioMain coronary artery diseaseNon-fatal myocardial infarctionCoronary artery bypassCoronary artery diseasePrimary endpointCause deathLesion revascularizationArtery bypassSYNTAX scoreCoronary interventionArtery diseaseClinical outcomesMyocardial infarctionIschemia-driven target lesion revascularizationLeft main coronary artery diseaseArt percutaneous coronary interventionLeft main coronary diseaseLower cardiovascular event ratesMajor adverse cardiovascular eventsLong-term clinical outcomesPropensity scorePhysiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention
2020
Safety of Revascularization Deferral of Left Main Stenosis Based on Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Evaluation
Warisawa T, Cook CM, Rajkumar C, Howard JP, Seligman H, Ahmad Y, El Hajj S, Doi S, Nakajima A, Nakayama M, Goto S, Vera-Urquiza R, Sato T, Kikuta Y, Kawase Y, Nishina H, Petraco R, Al-Lamee R, Nijjer S, Sen S, Nakamura S, Lerman A, Matsuo H, Francis DP, Akashi YJ, Escaned J, Davies JE. Safety of Revascularization Deferral of Left Main Stenosis Based on Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Evaluation. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions 2020, 13: 1655-1664. PMID: 32417088, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.02.035.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedClinical Decision-MakingCoronary Artery BypassCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary StenosisEuropeFemaleFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesRegistriesRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime FactorsTime-to-TreatmentTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesConceptsInstantaneous wave-free ratioNonfatal myocardial infarctionPrimary endpointLM stenosisCause deathLesion revascularizationSecondary endpointsCardiac deathMyocardial infarctionIschemia-driven target lesion revascularizationSimilar long-term outcomesStable coronary artery diseaseMain coronary artery stenosisLong-term clinical outcomesSafety of deferralMulticenter observational studyTarget lesion revascularizationLeft main stenosisCoronary artery diseaseLong-term outcomesCoronary artery stenosisDeferred groupLM revascularizationMedian followRevascularization deferralDifference in functional assessment of individual stenosis severity in serial coronary lesions between resting and hyperemic pressure-wire pullback: Insights from the GIFT registry
Warisawa T, Howard JP, Kawase Y, Tanigaki T, Omori H, Cook CM, Ahmad Y, Francis DP, Akashi YJ, Matsuo H, Davies JE. Difference in functional assessment of individual stenosis severity in serial coronary lesions between resting and hyperemic pressure-wire pullback: Insights from the GIFT registry. International Journal Of Cardiology 2020, 312: 10-15. PMID: 32376416, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.05.001.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsFractional flow reserveInstantaneous wave-free ratioCoronary lesionsPressure-wire pullbackCoronary artery lesionsPhysiological assessmentArtery lesionsConsecutive patientsCoronary stenosisHemodynamic significanceWave-free periodFlow reserveHemodynamic interactionSerial lesionsSerial stenosesFunctional assessmentStenosis severityLesionsStenosisHyperemic conditionsStatistical differenceWhole cardiac cycleReference standardCardiac cyclePredominancePer-Vessel Level Analysis of Fractional Flow Reserve and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Discordance ― Insights From the AJIP Registry ―
Warisawa T, Cook CM, Seligman H, Howard JP, Ahmad Y, Rajkumar C, Doi S, Nakayama M, Tanigaki T, Omori H, Nakajima A, Yamanaka F, Goto S, Yakuta Y, Karube K, Uetani T, Kikuta Y, Shiono Y, Kawase Y, Nishina H, Nakamura S, Escaned J, Akashi YJ, Matsuo H, Davies JE. Per-Vessel Level Analysis of Fractional Flow Reserve and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Discordance ― Insights From the AJIP Registry ―. Circulation Journal 2020, 84: 1034-1038. PMID: 32321880, DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-19-0785.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2019
Physiological Pattern of Disease Assessed by Pressure-Wire Pullback Has an Influence on Fractional Flow Reserve/Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Discordance
Warisawa T, Cook CM, Howard JP, Ahmad Y, Doi S, Nakayama M, Goto S, Yakuta Y, Karube K, Shun-Shin MJ, Petraco R, Sen S, Nijjer S, Lamee R, Ishibashi Y, Matsuda H, Escaned J, di Mario C, Francis DP, Akashi YJ, Davies JE. Physiological Pattern of Disease Assessed by Pressure-Wire Pullback Has an Influence on Fractional Flow Reserve/Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Discordance. Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions 2019, 12: e007494-e007494. PMID: 31084237, PMCID: PMC6553990, DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.118.007494.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsInstantaneous wave-free ratioFractional flow reservePressure-wire pullbackCoronary artery diseaseArtery diseaseCoronary lesionsHemodynamic significancePhysiological patternsInternational multicenter registryIntermediate coronary lesionsMedian fractional flow reserveMulticenter registryFlow reserveDiseaseLesionsCut pointsIFR measurementDiscordanceRegistryFactors