2022
Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy
Sreenivasan J, Shah A, Riangwiwat T, Rajendran R, Sosa C, Gupta R, Frishman W, Timmermans R, Ahmad H, Aronow W, Ahmad Y. Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy. Cardiology In Review 2022, 32: 267-272. PMID: 36541962, DOI: 10.1097/crd.0000000000000502.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPercutaneous coronary interventionCoronary artery calcificationCoronary intravascular lithotripsyIntravascular lithotripsyArtery calcificationCoronary stenosisLong-term clinical outcome dataSuccessful percutaneous coronary interventionSerious procedural complicationsAdverse cardiac eventsCurrent clinical dataClinical outcome dataCurrent treatment modalitiesAdjunctive therapyCardiac eventsCoronary interventionCoronary calcificationProcedural complicationsProspective studyTreatment modalitiesClinical dataOutcome dataStent deploymentCalcificationSteep learning curve
2020
Difference in functional assessment of individual stenosis severity in serial coronary lesions between resting and hyperemic pressure-wire pullback: Insights from the GIFT registry
Warisawa T, Howard JP, Kawase Y, Tanigaki T, Omori H, Cook CM, Ahmad Y, Francis DP, Akashi YJ, Matsuo H, Davies JE. Difference in functional assessment of individual stenosis severity in serial coronary lesions between resting and hyperemic pressure-wire pullback: Insights from the GIFT registry. International Journal Of Cardiology 2020, 312: 10-15. PMID: 32376416, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.05.001.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsFractional flow reserveInstantaneous wave-free ratioCoronary lesionsPressure-wire pullbackCoronary artery lesionsPhysiological assessmentArtery lesionsConsecutive patientsCoronary stenosisHemodynamic significanceWave-free periodFlow reserveHemodynamic interactionSerial lesionsSerial stenosesFunctional assessmentStenosis severityLesionsStenosisHyperemic conditionsStatistical differenceWhole cardiac cycleReference standardCardiac cyclePredominance
2019
Determining the Predominant Lesion in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Coronary Stenoses
Ahmad Y, Vendrik J, Eftekhari A, Howard JP, Cook C, Rajkumar C, Malik I, Mikhail G, Ruparelia N, Hadjiloizou N, Nijjer S, Al-Lamee R, Petraco R, Warisawa T, Wijntjens GWM, Koch KT, van de Hoef T, de Waard G, Echavarria-Pinto M, Frame A, Sutaria N, Kanaganayagam G, Ariff B, Anderson J, Chukwuemeka A, Fertleman M, Koul S, Iglesias JF, Francis D, Mayet J, Serruys P, Davies J, Escaned J, van Royen N, Götberg M, Terkelsen C, Christiansen E, Piek JJ, Baan J, Sen S. Determining the Predominant Lesion in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Coronary Stenoses. Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions 2019, 12: e008263-e008263. PMID: 31752515, PMCID: PMC6924937, DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.119.008263.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAged, 80 and overAortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisBlood Flow VelocityCardiac CatheterizationCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary CirculationCoronary StenosisCoronary VesselsEuropeFemaleHemodynamicsHumansMaleMicrocirculationPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPredictive Value of TestsRecovery of FunctionSeverity of Illness IndexTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementTreatment OutcomeConceptsTranscatheter aortic valve implantationSevere aortic stenosisPercutaneous coronary interventionAortic stenosisCoronary artery diseaseCoronary stenosisIntermediate coronary stenosisCoronary diseaseCoronary interventionArtery diseaseCoronary microcirculationWave-free periodInstantaneous wave-free ratio valueConcomitant coronary artery diseaseConcomitant coronary diseaseAortic valve implantationInstantaneous wave-free ratioPhysiology-guided revascularizationExertional symptomsPost-TAVIHemodynamic improvementHemodynamic benefitsValve implantationCoronary lesionsMicrovascular resistance