2022
Coronary flow reserve and cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kelshiker MA, Seligman H, Howard JP, Rahman H, Foley M, Nowbar AN, Rajkumar CA, Shun-Shin MJ, Ahmad Y, Sen S, Al-Lamee R, Petraco R. Coronary flow reserve and cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Heart Journal 2022, 43: 1582-1593. PMID: 36282780, DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab775.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMajor adverse cardiovascular eventsAbnormal coronary flow reserveCoronary flow reserveCause mortalityCoronary flowHigh incidenceHazard ratioFlow reserveAdverse cardiovascular eventsCoronary microvascular dysfunctionAcute coronary syndromeRandom-effects modelEstimate of effectCardiovascular eventsCardiovascular outcomesCoronary syndromeMicrovascular dysfunctionHeart failureHeart transplantClinical outcomesPatient groupRisk modificationHigh riskClinical practiceSystematic review
2021
Coronary flow reserve and cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Kelshiker MA, Seligman H, Howard JP, Rahman H, Foley M, Nowbar AN, Rajkumar CA, Shun-Shin MJ, Ahmad Y, Sen S, Al-Lamee R, Petraco R, Cole G, Hoole S, Paul D, Rigo F, Francis D, Mayet J. Coronary flow reserve and cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Heart Journal 2021, 43: 1582-1593. PMID: 34849697, PMCID: PMC9020988, DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab775.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMajor adverse cardiovascular eventsAbnormal coronary flow reserveCoronary flow reserveCause mortalityCoronary flowHigh incidenceHazard ratioFlow reserveAdverse cardiovascular eventsCoronary microvascular dysfunctionAcute coronary syndromeRandom-effects modelEstimate of effectCardiovascular eventsCardiovascular outcomesCoronary syndromeMicrovascular dysfunctionHeart failureHeart transplantClinical outcomesPatient groupRisk modificationHigh riskClinical practiceSystematic review
2017
CRT-100.83 Discordance in Stenosis Classification by Pressure Only Indices of Stenosis Severity is Related to Differences in Coronary Flow Reserve: - The DISCORD Study
Cook C, Jeremias A, Ahmad Y, Shun-Shin M, Petraco R, Nijjer S, de Waard G, Sen S, Van de Hoef T, Echavarria-Pinto M, van Lavieren M, Al-Lamee R, Kikuta Y, Shiono Y, Buch A, Meuwissen M, Danad I, Knaapen P, Maeharah A, Koo B, Mintz G, Piek J, Van Royen N, Davies J. CRT-100.83 Discordance in Stenosis Classification by Pressure Only Indices of Stenosis Severity is Related to Differences in Coronary Flow Reserve: - The DISCORD Study. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions 2017, 10: s27. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.12.107.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2016
TCT-513 Discordance In Stenosis Classification by pressure-Only indices of stenosis severity is Related to Differences in coronary flow reserve: The RESOLVING DISCORD study
Cook C, Jeremias A, Ahmad Y, Shun-Shin M, Nijjer S, de Waard G, Sen S, van de Hoef T, Pinto M, van Lavieren M, Petraco R, Al-Lamee R, Meuwissen M, Danad I, Knaapen P, Maehara A, Koo B, Mintz G, Escaned J, Stone G, Piek J, van Royen N, Davies J. TCT-513 Discordance In Stenosis Classification by pressure-Only indices of stenosis severity is Related to Differences in coronary flow reserve: The RESOLVING DISCORD study. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2016, 68: b206-b207. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.09.650.Peer-Reviewed Original Research