2022
Site-Level Variation and Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following TAVR in the Evolut Low-Risk Trial
Gada H, Vora AN, Tang GHL, Mumtaz M, Forrest JK, Laham RJ, Yakubov SJ, Deeb GM, Rammohan C, Huang J, Reardon MJ. Site-Level Variation and Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following TAVR in the Evolut Low-Risk Trial. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine 2022, 47: 48-54. PMID: 36266154, DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2022.10.004.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTranscatheter aortic valve replacementPermanent pacemaker implantationNew permanent pacemaker implantationAortic valve replacementPPI rateValve replacementPacemaker implantationClinical outcomesBenefits of TAVRSelf-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacementBaseline right bundle branch blockRate of PPIEvolut Low Risk trialSurgical aortic valve replacementRight bundle branch blockLow-risk trialsLeft coronary sinusLow-risk patientsBundle branch blockEvolut valvesCoronary sinusGeneral anesthesiaConduction disordersBranch blockProcedural characteristics
2021
NATIONAL TRENDS OF PERMANENT PACEMAKER IMPLANTATION AFTER TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT: AN ANALYSIS FROM THE STS/ACC TVT REGISTRY
Chau K, George I, Vemulapalli S, Wegermann Z, Forrest J, Yakubov S, Williams M, Manandhar P, Vahl T, Leon M, Kodali S, Kirtane A, Nazif T. NATIONAL TRENDS OF PERMANENT PACEMAKER IMPLANTATION AFTER TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT: AN ANALYSIS FROM THE STS/ACC TVT REGISTRY. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2021, 77: 918. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(21)02277-4.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2017
1-Year Results in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Failed Surgical Bioprostheses
Deeb GM, Chetcuti SJ, Reardon MJ, Patel HJ, Grossman PM, Schreiber T, Forrest JK, Bajwa TK, O’Hair D, Petrossian G, Robinson N, Katz S, Hartman A, Dauerman HL, Schmoker J, Khabbaz K, Watson DR, Yakubov SJ, Oh JK, Li S, Kleiman NS, Adams DH, Popma JJ. 1-Year Results in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Failed Surgical Bioprostheses. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions 2017, 10: 1034-1044. PMID: 28521921, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.018.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAged, 80 and overAortic ValveAortic Valve InsufficiencyAortic Valve StenosisEchocardiographyFemaleHeart Valve ProsthesisHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationHemodynamicsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesProsthesis FailureQuality of LifeRecovery of FunctionRecurrenceReoperationRisk FactorsTime FactorsTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementTreatment OutcomeConceptsSelf-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacementTranscatheter aortic valve replacementAortic valve replacementMajor stroke rateAortic regurgitationValve replacementStroke rateValve hemodynamicsSevere native aortic valve stenosisSuccessful transcatheter aortic valve replacementNative aortic valve stenosisNew permanent pacemaker implantationSevere residual aortic regurgitationValve prosthesis-patient mismatchMean aortic gradientMean valve gradientResidual aortic regurgitationSevere aortic regurgitationProsthesis-patient mismatchCause mortality ratesIndependent core laboratoryModerate aortic regurgitationPermanent pacemaker implantationAortic valve stenosisAortic valve hemodynamics