External validation of the PROGRESS‐CTO perforation risk score: Individual patient data pooled analysis of three registries
Simsek B, Tajti P, Carlino M, Ojeda S, Pan M, Rinfret S, Vemmou E, Kostantinis S, Nikolakopoulos I, Karacsonyi J, Rempakos A, Dens J, Agostoni P, Alaswad K, Megaly M, Avran A, Choi J, Jaffer F, Doshi D, Karmpaliotis D, Khatri J, Knaapen P, La Manna A, Spratt J, Tanabe M, Walsh S, Mastrodemos O, Allana S, Rangan B, Goktekin O, Gorgulu S, Poommipanit P, Kearney K, Lombardi W, Grantham J, Mashayekhi K, Brilakis E, Azzalini L. External validation of the PROGRESS‐CTO perforation risk score: Individual patient data pooled analysis of three registries. Catheterization And Cardiovascular Interventions 2023, 101: 326-332. PMID: 36617391, DOI: 10.1002/ccd.30551.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPercutaneous coronary interventionCTO percutaneous coronary interventionCoronary artery perforationArtery perforationRisk scorePrior coronary artery bypass graftChronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary interventionCoronary artery bypass graftIndividual patient-level dataModerate-severe calcificationUnfavorable angiographic characteristicsArtery bypass graftIndividual patient dataRisk of perforationPatient-level dataProximal cap ambiguityGood discriminative performanceBlunt stumpAngiographic characteristicsCoronary interventionCommon complicationBypass graftTechnical successPerforation riskIndependent cohort