2023
Feasibility of redo-TAVI in self-expanding Evolut valves: a CT analysis from the Evolut Low Risk Trial substudy.
Grubb K, Shekiladze N, Spencer J, Perdoncin E, Tang G, Xie J, Lisko J, Sanchez J, Lucas L, Sathananthan J, Rogers T, Deeb G, Fukuhara S, Blanke P, Leipsic J, Forrest J, Reardon M, Gleason P. Feasibility of redo-TAVI in self-expanding Evolut valves: a CT analysis from the Evolut Low Risk Trial substudy. EuroIntervention 2023, 19: e330-e339. PMID: 37067193, PMCID: PMC10333920, DOI: 10.4244/eij-d-22-01125.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRedo-TAVIFlow compromiseEvolut valvesBalloon-expandable SAPIEN 3Transcatheter aortic valve implantationHigher Body Mass IndexAortic valve implantationAortic root dimensionsBody mass indexSinotubular junction diameterSmaller annulus diameterSAPIEN 3Clinical characteristicsValve implantationTranscatheter valveMass indexAnatomical feasibilityCoronary accessFemale sexCoronary heightsAnnulus diameterHigh riskEvolutLower sinusProcedural variables
2015
Aortic Annulus Diameter Affects Durability of the Repaired Bicuspid Aortic Valve.
Vallabhajosyula P, Komlo CM, Szeto WY, Rhode T, Menon R, Desai ND, Bavaria JE. Aortic Annulus Diameter Affects Durability of the Repaired Bicuspid Aortic Valve. The Journal Of Heart Valve Disease 2015, 24: 412-9. PMID: 26897808.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAortic ValveAortic Valve InsufficiencyBicuspid Aortic Valve DiseaseCardiac Valve AnnuloplastyChi-Square DistributionDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHeart Valve DiseasesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioRecurrenceReplantationRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeConceptsValve-sparing root reimplantationFive-year freedomSubcommissural annuloplastyAnnular diameterSCA groupAI gradeSCA subgroupsBicuspid aortic valve repairAortic insufficiency gradeAortic annular diameterBicuspid aortic valveAortic annulus diameterAortic valve repairBAV repairVSRR groupVSRR patientsMidterm outcomesBAV patientsAortic annulusRetrospective reviewRoot reimplantationValve repairAortic valveUnivariate analysisAnnulus diameterComparison of Transesophageal and Transthoracic Echocardiographic Measurements of Mechanism and Severity of Mitral Regurgitation in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (from the Surgical Treatment of Ischemic Heart Failure Trial)
Grayburn PA, She L, Roberts BJ, Golba KS, Mokrzycki K, Drozdz J, Cherniavsky A, Przybylski R, Wrobel K, Asch FM, Holly TA, Haddad H, Yii M, Maurer G, Kron I, Schaff H, Velazquez EJ, Oh JK. Comparison of Transesophageal and Transthoracic Echocardiographic Measurements of Mechanism and Severity of Mitral Regurgitation in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (from the Surgical Treatment of Ischemic Heart Failure Trial). The American Journal Of Cardiology 2015, 116: 913-918. PMID: 26170249, PMCID: PMC4554976, DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.06.015.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTransesophageal echocardiographyMitral regurgitationIschemic cardiomyopathyMR gradeIschemic Heart Failure (STICH) trialMechanism of MRBaseline transesophageal echocardiographyHeart Failure TrialIndependent core laboratoryIschemic heart diseaseFunctional mitral regurgitationComparison of TransesophagealMitral annular diameterModest correlationMitral annulus diameterTransthoracic echocardiographic measurementsTransthoracic echocardiography imagingTenting areaBlood pressureSurgical treatmentFailure TrialEchocardiographic measurementsHeart diseaseTTE measurementsAnnulus diameter
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply