Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Treating In-Stent Restenosis in Unprotected-Left Main: LM-DRAGON-Registry
Wańha W, Bil J, Kołodziejczak M, Kowalówka A, Kowalewski M, Hudziak D, Gocoł R, Januszek R, Figatowski T, Milewski M, Tomasiewicz B, Kübler P, Hrymniak B, Desperak P, Kuźma Ł, Milewski K, Góra B, Łoś A, Kulczycki J, Włodarczak A, Skorupski W, Grygier M, Lesiak M, D'Ascenzo F, Andres M, Kleczynski P, Litwinowicz R, Borin A, Smolka G, Reczuch K, Gruchała M, Gil RJ, Jaguszewski M, Bartuś K, Suwalski P, Dobrzycki S, Dudek D, Bartuś S, Ga̧sior M, Ochała A, Lansky AJ, Deja M, Legutko J, Kedhi E, Wojakowski W. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Treating In-Stent Restenosis in Unprotected-Left Main: LM-DRAGON-Registry. Frontiers In Cardiovascular Medicine 2022, 9: 849971. PMID: 35615559, PMCID: PMC9125786, DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.849971.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPercutaneous coronary interventionTarget vessel revascularizationCoronary artery bypassCardiac deathMyocardial infarctionPCI groupArtery bypassCoronary interventionStent restenosisUnprotected left main coronary arteryLeft main coronary arteryMain coronary arteryManagement of patientsAnalysis of patientsCerebrovascular eventsPrimary endpointVessel revascularizationConsecutive patientsCoronary arteryCABGLower incidenceLower riskPatientsDeathMACCE
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply