2021
Cost-Effectiveness of First-Line Versus Second-Line Use of Daratumumab in Older, Transplant-Ineligible Patients With Multiple Myeloma.
Patel KK, Giri S, Parker TL, Bar N, Neparidze N, Huntington SF. Cost-Effectiveness of First-Line Versus Second-Line Use of Daratumumab in Older, Transplant-Ineligible Patients With Multiple Myeloma. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2021, 39: 1119-1128. PMID: 33411586, DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.01849.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTransplant-ineligible patientsIncremental cost-effectiveness ratioFirst-line settingHealthcare costsClinical outcomesMultiple myelomaProgression-free survivalOverall survival dataUS payer perspectiveDirect healthcare costsCost-effectiveness ratioRandomized trialsDisease progressionTreatment strategiesParametric survival modelingPayer perspectiveSubsequent linesLater linesPatientsCostly treatmentIncremental costQALYSurvival dataLenalidomideMyeloma
2020
Cost-effectiveness of polatuzumab vedotin in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
Patel KK, Isufi I, Kothari S, Foss F, Huntington S. Cost-effectiveness of polatuzumab vedotin in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Leukemia & Lymphoma 2020, 61: 3387-3394. PMID: 32835553, DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2020.1808208.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsIncremental cost-effectiveness ratioLarge B-cell lymphomaB-cell lymphomaPola-BRR DLBCLRefractory diffuse large B-cell lymphomaLonger progression-free survivalRecent phase II trialDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaProgression-free survivalTransplant-ineligible patientsPhase II trialUS payer perspectiveCost-effectiveness ratioII trialOverall survivalTreatment strategiesPayer perspectiveLifetime horizonIncremental effectivenessIncremental costPolatuzumabRituximabLymphomaDLBCLEfficacy and safety of frontline regimens for older transplant-ineligible patients with multiple myeloma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Giri S, Aryal MR, Yu H, Grimshaw A, Pathak R, Huntington SP, Dhakal B. Efficacy and safety of frontline regimens for older transplant-ineligible patients with multiple myeloma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal Of Geriatric Oncology 2020, 11: 1285-1292. PMID: 32513568, PMCID: PMC8721742, DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2020.05.013.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTransplant-ineligible patientsMultiple myelomaTreatment optionsPhase II/IIICumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilitiesFirst-line treatmentHematopoietic cell transplantationTerms of efficacyRandom-effects modelEfficacious regimensFrailty biomarkersFrontline regimensThalidomide maintenanceEffective regimensGeriatric assessmentLine treatmentTreatment regimensCell transplantationMeeting libraryIndividual patientsToxicity profileRegimensPatientsSystematic reviewRanking probability
2019
Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Front-Line Regimens for the Treatment of Transplant Ineligible Patients with Multiple Myeloma: A Network Meta-Analysis of Phase 2/3 Randomized Controlled Trials
Giri S, Aryal M, Yu H, Grimshaw A, Pathak R, Huntington S, Dhakal B. Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Front-Line Regimens for the Treatment of Transplant Ineligible Patients with Multiple Myeloma: A Network Meta-Analysis of Phase 2/3 Randomized Controlled Trials. Blood 2019, 134: 2188. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2019-130389.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchProgression-free survivalOverall response rateHematopoietic cell transplantFront-line treatmentAdverse eventsOverall survivalMM patientsMultiple myelomaFrontline regimensClinical trialsAdvisory CommitteeCommon grade 3Cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilitiesFront-line regimensHigher adverse eventsPrimary efficacy outcomeTransplant-ineligible patientsPhase III RCTsNetwork Meta-AnalysisBias assessment toolRisk of biasEvaluation of efficacyIndividual patient needsEfficacious regimenEfficacious regimens