2013
Meta-Analysis of Everolimus-Eluting Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in Coronary Artery Disease Final 3-Year Results of the SPIRIT Clinical Trials Program (Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions)
Dangas GD, Serruys PW, Kereiakes DJ, Hermiller J, Rizvi A, Newman W, Sudhir K, Smith RS, Cao S, Theodoropoulos K, Cutlip DE, Lansky AJ, Stone GW. Meta-Analysis of Everolimus-Eluting Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in Coronary Artery Disease Final 3-Year Results of the SPIRIT Clinical Trials Program (Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions). JACC Cardiovascular Interventions 2013, 6: 914-922. PMID: 24050859, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.005.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedCardiovascular AgentsCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary RestenosisCoronary ThrombosisDrug-Eluting StentsEverolimusFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicMultivariate AnalysisMyocardial InfarctionPaclitaxelPercutaneous Coronary InterventionProportional Hazards ModelsProsthesis DesignRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsSirolimusTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeConceptsPaclitaxel-eluting stentsIschemia-driven target lesion revascularizationMajor adverse cardiac eventsAdverse cardiac eventsTarget lesion revascularizationLesion failureMyocardial infarctionLesion revascularizationCause mortalityCardiac eventsStent thrombosisStent typeEvent ratesTarget lesion failureClinical trial programException of diabetesIndividual patient dataIndividual clinical outcomesCardiac deathComposite endpointClinical outcomesSPIRIT IIClinical trialsCoronary implantationTrial program
2011
Long-Term (Three-Year) Safety and Efficacy of Everolimus-Eluting Stents Compared to Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents (from the SPIRIT III Trial)
Applegate RJ, Yaqub M, Hermiller JB, Sood P, Yu S, Doostzadeh J, Williams JE, Farhat N, Caputo R, Lansky AJ, Cutlip DE, Sudhir K, Stone GW. Long-Term (Three-Year) Safety and Efficacy of Everolimus-Eluting Stents Compared to Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents (from the SPIRIT III Trial). The American Journal Of Cardiology 2011, 107: 833-840. PMID: 21247538, DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.10.069.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary RestenosisCoronary ThrombosisDrug-Eluting StentsEverolimusFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPaclitaxelProspective StudiesSingle-Blind MethodSirolimusSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeTubulin ModulatorsUnited StatesConceptsPaclitaxel-eluting stentsMajor adverse cardiovascular eventsSPIRIT III trialAdverse cardiovascular eventsCardiovascular eventsIII trialsPrimary clinical end pointLimited long-term dataTarget lesion revascularizationTarget vessel failureEvent-free survivalClinical end pointsEverolimus-Eluting StentsLong-term safetyLesion revascularizationCardiac deathCoronary arteryMyocardial infarctionSPIRIT IIClinical trialsEfficacy profileUnited States sitesLandmark analysisTerm safetyXIENCE V
2010
Clinical Follow-Up 3 Years After Everolimus- and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents A Pooled Analysis From the SPIRIT II (A Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) and SPIRIT III (A Clinical Evaluation of the Investigational Device XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System [EECSS] in the Treatment of Subjects With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) Randomized Trials
Caixeta A, Lansky AJ, Serruys PW, Hermiller JB, Ruygrok P, Onuma Y, Gordon P, Yaqub M, Miquel-Hebert K, Veldhof S, Sood P, Su X, Jonnavithula L, Sudhir K, Stone GW, Investigators S. Clinical Follow-Up 3 Years After Everolimus- and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents A Pooled Analysis From the SPIRIT II (A Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) and SPIRIT III (A Clinical Evaluation of the Investigational Device XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System [EECSS] in the Treatment of Subjects With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) Randomized Trials. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions 2010, 3: 1220-1228. PMID: 21232715, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.07.017.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicAspirinClopidogrelConfidence IntervalsCoronary Artery DiseaseDrug-Eluting StentsEverolimusFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsKaplan-Meier EstimateLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPaclitaxelPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsProportional Hazards ModelsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRiskRisk Reduction BehaviorSirolimusTiclopidineTime FactorsConceptsMajor adverse cardiac eventsPaclitaxel-eluting stentsAdverse cardiac eventsTarget vessel failureCardiac eventsMyocardial infarctionSPIRIT IIProbable stent thrombosisAcademic Research ConsortiumEverolimus-eluting stentsVessel failureSignificant reductionLesion revascularizationPES patientsRevascularization eventsIII trialsClinical outcomesEE patientsStent thrombosisPooled analysisCumulative ratePersistent reductionSPIRIT IIIPatientsStentsRandomized comparison of everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents: pooled analysis of 3-year clinical outcomes from the Spirit II and III Trials
Lansky A, Hermiller J, Applegate R, Caixeta A, Gordon P, Ruygrok P, Doostzadeh J, Miquel-Hebert K, Veldhof S, Sood P, Su X, Sudhir K, Serruys P, Stone G. Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents: pooled analysis of 3-year clinical outcomes from the Spirit II and III Trials. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine 2010, 11: 277. DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2010.03.028.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchA pooled gender based analysis comparing the XIENCE V(R) everolimus-eluting stent and the TAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stent in male and female patients with coronary artery disease, results of the SPIRIT II and SPIRIT III studies: two-year analysis.
Seth A, Serruys PW, Lansky A, Hermiller J, Onuma Y, Miquel-Hebert K, Yu S, Veldhof S, Sood P, Sudhir K, Stone GW. A pooled gender based analysis comparing the XIENCE V(R) everolimus-eluting stent and the TAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stent in male and female patients with coronary artery disease, results of the SPIRIT II and SPIRIT III studies: two-year analysis. EuroIntervention 2010, 5: 788-94. PMID: 20142192, DOI: 10.4244/eijv5i7a132.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryCardiovascular AgentsCoronary AngiographyCoronary RestenosisCoronary StenosisDrug-Eluting StentsEverolimusFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicMyocardial InfarctionPaclitaxelProsthesis DesignRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSex FactorsSingle-Blind MethodSirolimusThrombosisTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeConceptsMajor adverse cardiac eventsPaclitaxel-eluting stentsTAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stentTarget vessel failureAngiographic late lossLate lossDiameter stenosisIII studyPooled analysisSPIRIT IIAdverse cardiac eventsSegment late lossStent late lossCoronary artery diseaseEES groupCardiac eventsArtery diseaseFemale patientsPES groupPatient levelClinical dataXIENCE VStent typeTwo-year analysisWomen