2024
The analytical and clinical validity of AI algorithms to score TILs in TNBC: can we use different machine learning models interchangeably?
Vidal J, Tsiknakis N, Staaf J, Bosch A, Ehinger A, Nimeus E, Salgado R, Bai Y, Rimm D, Hartman J, Acs B. The analytical and clinical validity of AI algorithms to score TILs in TNBC: can we use different machine learning models interchangeably? EClinicalMedicine 2024, 78: 102928. PMID: 39634035, PMCID: PMC11615110, DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102928.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchTriple-negative breast cancerTumor-infiltrating lymphocytesBreast Cancer Research FoundationPrognostic validityMetastatic triple-negative breast cancerDisease-free survival endpointsHazard ratioHost anti-tumor immunityScored tumor infiltrating lymphocytesTumor-infiltrating lymphocyte scoresTriple-negative breast cancer patientsYears median follow-upTumour-infiltrating lymphocyte assessmentAnti-tumor immunityMedian Follow-UpIndependent prospective cohortTNBC tumorsPrognostic potentialProspective cohortBreast cancerPrognostic performanceAnalytic cohortFollow-upSchool of MedicineSwedish Society for Medical Research
2022
PROGNOSTIC VALIDITY OF FRAILTY ASSESSMENT TOOLS IN PREDICTION OF MORTALITY AND MAJOR AMPUTATION IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING REVASCULARIZATION FOR LOWER EXTREMITY ARTERIAL DISEASE
Nikooie R, Smolderen K, Al-Damluji M, Meng C, Dai F, Nanna M, Sumpio B, Henke P, Mena-Hurtado C. PROGNOSTIC VALIDITY OF FRAILTY ASSESSMENT TOOLS IN PREDICTION OF MORTALITY AND MAJOR AMPUTATION IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING REVASCULARIZATION FOR LOWER EXTREMITY ARTERIAL DISEASE. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2022, 79: 1779. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(22)02770-x.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2020
Significance of fluid retention, body mass index, and weight loss in patients with advanced cancer
Amano K, Maeda I, Ishiki H, Miura T, Hatano Y, Oya K, Sakashita A, Ito S, Hiratsuka Y, Morita T, Mori M. Significance of fluid retention, body mass index, and weight loss in patients with advanced cancer. JCSM Clinical Reports 2020, 5: 69-78. DOI: 10.1002/crt2.23.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchBody mass index groupsBody mass indexValidity of body mass indexMass indexAdvanced cancerGrading systemNo significant differenceFluid retentionAsian cancer patientsProspective cohort studyPrevalence of pleural effusionWeight lossSurvival rateMultivariate Cox regression analysisPrognostic validityKaplan-Meier methodLog-rank testSignificant differenceCox regression analysisTime-to-event analysisSecondary analysisCohort studyMedian survivalPrognostic significancePleural effusion
2013
The Modified Graeb Score
Morgan TC, Dawson J, Spengler D, Lees KR, Aldrich C, Mishra NK, Lane K, Quinn TJ, Diener-West M, Weir CJ, Higgins P, Rafferty M, Kinsley K, Ziai W, Awad I, Walters MR, Hanley D. The Modified Graeb Score. Stroke 2013, 44: 635-641. PMID: 23370203, PMCID: PMC6800016, DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.112.670653.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsVirtual International Stroke Trials ArchiveGraeb scalePoor outcomeIVH volumeB studyModified Rankin ScaleIntraventricular hemorrhage volumeModified Graeb scoreRankin ScaleMGS scoresVISTA studyHemorrhage volumeGraeb scoreAccelerated ResolutionPrognostic validitySemiquantitative scaleClinical practiceClot lysis
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply