2025
Civil Rights Laws for People With Opioid Use Disorder in the Emergency Department.
South A, Hawk K, Friedman S, Lofwall M, Fanucchi L, Cohen S. Civil Rights Laws for People With Opioid Use Disorder in the Emergency Department. Journal Of Addiction Medicine 2025 PMID: 40125857, DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000001480.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCivil rights lawsRights lawFederal civil rights lawOpioid use disorderLegal advocacyLegal liabilityUse disorderEmergency departmentAdoption of evidence-based practicesLawHealth care facilitiesHealth care systemEvidence-based practiceTreat opioid use disorderEvidence-based medicationsFatal overdoseRisk of deathOverdose crisisCare facilitiesCare systemEmergency cliniciansOutpatient treatmentEngage peopleLiabilityMedication
2024
Cross-sectional analysis of state and federal malpractice and medical liability claims for cutaneous energy-based device procedures, 1985 to 2023
Stratman S, Dover J, Labadie J. Cross-sectional analysis of state and federal malpractice and medical liability claims for cutaneous energy-based device procedures, 1985 to 2023. Journal Of The American Academy Of Dermatology 2024, 91: 742-744. PMID: 38906260, DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2024.06.033.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2022
Demystifying Medico-legal Challenges of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Molecular Imaging and Therapy
Mezrich JL. Demystifying Medico-legal Challenges of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Molecular Imaging and Therapy. PET Clinics 2022, 17: 41-49. PMID: 34809868, DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2021.08.002.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCause of actionMedico-legal challengesLegal causesLegal developmentsProduct liabilityMedical malpracticeArtificial intelligenceArtificial intelligence applicationsVariety of benefitsLawsuitsLegislationLiabilityMalpracticeAppropriate guidelinesHealth careAgenciesIntelligence applicationsActionNotionHurdlesMolecular imaging
2017
Data monitoring committees: Promoting best practices to address emerging challenges
Fleming T, DeMets D, Roe M, Wittes J, Calis K, Vora A, Meisel A, Bain R, Konstam M, Pencina M, Gordon D, Mahaffey K, Hennekens C, Neaton J, Pearson G, Andersson T, Pfeffer M, Ellenberg S. Data monitoring committees: Promoting best practices to address emerging challenges. Clinical Trials 2017, 14: 115-123. PMID: 28359194, PMCID: PMC5380168, DOI: 10.1177/1740774516688915.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsData monitoring committee membersInterests of study participantsCommittee membersLegal liabilityData monitoring committeeRigid proceduresRegulatory responsesPromote best practiceRegulatory agenciesCommittee chartersMonitoring committeeEffective functioningClinical trialsCommittee processCommitteeBest practicesIndependenceRegulatory scientistsGovernment sponsorsMembersIndustry-sponsored trialsLiabilityCharterBreachSafety data
2012
Dyshormonia Iatrogenica: Crossroads Of Medicine, Malpractice Law, And Professional Ethics In Clinical Endocrinology
Goldberg PA, Varriale DJ, Mercurio MR. Dyshormonia Iatrogenica: Crossroads Of Medicine, Malpractice Law, And Professional Ethics In Clinical Endocrinology. Endocrine Practice 2012, 18: 731-736. PMID: 22446133, DOI: 10.4158/ep11384.ra.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsProfessional ethicsMalpractice lawCrossroads of medicineMedical decision-making processEthical practiceEffective doctor-patient communicationPatients' rightsCompassionate physiciansGood physicianEthicsMedicolegal liabilityCommon conundrumInformed consentLawRightsDecision-making processThorough documentationClinical endocrinologyCases of patientsStandard of careLawyersPaternalismLiabilityVirtueDoctor-patient communication
2006
Disclosing Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Research: Views of Institutional Review Boards, Conflict of Interest Committees, and Investigators
Weinfurt KP, Friedman JY, Dinan MA, Allsbrook JS, Hall MA, Dhillon JK, Sugarman J. Disclosing Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Research: Views of Institutional Review Boards, Conflict of Interest Committees, and Investigators. The Journal Of Law, Medicine & Ethics 2006, 34: 581-591. PMID: 17144182, PMCID: PMC1850937, DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2006.00072.x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAttitude of Health PersonnelBiomedical ResearchCommunication BarriersConflict of InterestDecision MakingDisclosureEthics Committees, ResearchHuman ExperimentationHumansInformed ConsentInterviews as TopicLiability, LegalOrganizational PolicyResearch SubjectsResearch Support as TopicTrustUnited StatesConceptsFinancial interestsConflicts of interestPotential research participantsInstitutional review board chairsInvestigators' financial interestsInterests of participantsResearch participantsBenefits of disclosureLegal liabilityInterest CommitteeResearch institutionsDisclosureConsent processConflictBoard chairsGeneral agreementInstitutionsDecisionsInterestLiabilityRightsGeneral attitudesRationaleReview boardCircumstances
1997
Effect of Blameworthiness and Outcome Severity on Attributions of Responsibility and Damage Awards in Comparative Negligence Cases
Feigenson N, Park J, Salovey P. Effect of Blameworthiness and Outcome Severity on Attributions of Responsibility and Damage Awards in Comparative Negligence Cases. Law And Human Behavior 1997, 21: 597-617. DOI: 10.1023/a:1024856613829.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
1992
The Law, Public Policy, and the Peddlers of Tobacco-Reply
Gostin L, Cleary P, Brandt A. The Law, Public Policy, and the Peddlers of Tobacco-Reply. JAMA 1992, 267: 1614-1614. DOI: 10.1001/jama.1992.03480120051031.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchOwn health decisionsCourt systemSupreme CourtOral argumentsTort systemPotential liabilityGovernmental regulationsTobacco manufacturersPublic policyTobacco companiesCigarette manufacturersResponsibilityIndirect regulationRegulationDangers of smokingCourtLawLiabilityPublic health adviceCompaniesWorse outcomesHealth advicePossessionArgumentDecisions
1989
Statutory approaches to limiting psychiatrists' liability for their patients' violent acts
Appelbaum P, Zonana H, Bonnie R, Roth L. Statutory approaches to limiting psychiatrists' liability for their patients' violent acts. American Journal Of Psychiatry 1989, 146: 821-828. PMID: 2742008, DOI: 10.1176/ajp.146.7.821.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPatients' violent actsViolent actsResource documentGoals of reformLegal dutyModel statuteMental health professionsLegislative actionMental health professionalsPotential victimsLegitimate needPublic safetyClinician's responsibilityStatutesLiabilityActsResponsibilityVariety of waysDocumentsHealth professionsCourtLegislationDutyReformVictims
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply