2024
Reviewer Experience Detecting and Judging Human Versus Artificial Intelligence Content: The Stroke Journal Essay Contest
Silva G, Khera R, Schwamm L, Acampa M, Adelman E, Boltze J, Broderick J, Brodtmann A, Christensen H, Dalli L, Duncan K, Elgendy I, Ergul A, Goldstein L, Hinkle J, Johansen M, Jood K, Kasner S, Levine S, Li Z, Lip G, Marsh E, Muir K, Ospel J, Pera J, Quinn T, Räty S, Ranta A, Richards L, Romero J, Willey J, Hillis A, Veerbeek J. Reviewer Experience Detecting and Judging Human Versus Artificial Intelligence Content: The Stroke Journal Essay Contest. Stroke 2024, 55: 2573-2578. PMID: 39224979, PMCID: PMC11529699, DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.124.045012.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsArtificial intelligenceEditorial board membersAuthor typeTraditional peer reviewLanguage modelIntelligent contentAuthor attributionGeneral textAI expertiseHuman authorityImproved accuracyAuthor's identityAuthor's manuscriptScientific journalsEssay contestPeer reviewPerception of qualityAuthorshipNature of authorshipIntelligenceLLMScientific writingScientific essayEssay qualityEssay
1991
Is a mechanism such as the NCI's Clinical Alert ever an appropriate alternative to journal peer review?
DeVita V. Is a mechanism such as the NCI's Clinical Alert ever an appropriate alternative to journal peer review? 1991, 241-54. PMID: 1869279.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsJournal peer review systemTraditional peer reviewJournal peer reviewNational research enterpriseClinical alertsPeer review systemNational Cancer Advisory BoardPeer reviewPublication of scientific worksCommunicating informationReview systemAcademic toolsAlertsPracticing physiciansAdvisory BoardPhysiciansDecision-making processInformationColon cancerClinicStages of colon cancerResearch enterpriseAcademic advancementAdjuvant drug therapy
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply