2005
Advancing an epidural catheter 10 cm then retracting it 5 cm is no more effective than advancing it 5 cm
Cartagena R, Gaiser R. Advancing an epidural catheter 10 cm then retracting it 5 cm is no more effective than advancing it 5 cm. Journal Of Clinical Anesthesia 2005, 17: 528-530. PMID: 16297752, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2005.08.002.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAnesthesia, EpiduralAnesthesia, ObstetricalCatheterizationFemaleHumansParesthesiaPilot ProjectsPregnancyProspective StudiesConceptsEpidural catheterIntravascular placementSensory levelProspective Randomized StudyClear clinical benefitUniversity Medical CenterRandomized studyEpidural anesthesiaClinical benefitEpidural spaceMedical CenterCatheterParesthesiaDelivery unitFurther studiesPatientsGroupPlacementParturientsAnesthesiaHigh frequency
2000
Effects of immediately initiating an epidural infusion in the combined spinal and epidural technique in nulliparous parturients
Gaiser R, Lewin S, Cheek T, Gutsche B. Effects of immediately initiating an epidural infusion in the combined spinal and epidural technique in nulliparous parturients. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2000, 25: 223-227. PMID: 10834774, DOI: 10.1016/s1098-7339(00)90002-6.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsDuration of analgesiaBlood pressureIntrathecal injectionEpidural infusionNulliparous parturientsMotor blockREF groupEpidural techniqueEphedrine useSensory levelDegree of analgesiaSeverity of pruritusAdditional analgesiaIntrathecal fentanylEpidural salineLabor analgesiaCervical dilationAnalgesiaSide effectsFentanylInfusionStatistical significanceGreater decreasePruritusParturientsEffects of Immediately Initiating an Epidural Infusion in the Combined Spinal and Epidural Technique in Nulliparous Parturients
Gaiser R, Lewin S, Cheek T, Gutsche B. Effects of Immediately Initiating an Epidural Infusion in the Combined Spinal and Epidural Technique in Nulliparous Parturients. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2000, 25: 223-227. DOI: 10.1097/00115550-200005000-00003.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsDuration of analgesiaBlood pressureIntrathecal injectionEpidural infusionNulliparous parturientsMotor blockREF groupEpidural techniqueEphedrine useSensory levelDegree of analgesiaSeverity of pruritusAdditional analgesiaCombined SpinalIntrathecal fentanylEpidural salineLabor analgesiaCervical dilationAnalgesiaSide effectsFentanylInfusionStatistical significanceGreater decreasePruritusComparison of combined spinal-epidural and low dose epidural for labour analgesia
Hepner D, Gaiser R, Cheek T, Gutsche B. Comparison of combined spinal-epidural and low dose epidural for labour analgesia. Journal Canadien D'anesthésie 2000, 47: 232-236. PMID: 10730733, DOI: 10.1007/bf03018918.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAnalgesia, EpiduralAnalgesia, ObstetricalAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalBuffersBupivacaineChi-Square DistributionDouble-Blind MethodEpinephrineFemaleFentanylHumansInjections, SpinalMotor NeuronsNerve BlockPainPain MeasurementPatient SatisfactionPregnancyProspective StudiesSodium BicarbonateTime FactorsVasoconstrictor AgentsConceptsEpidural analgesiaComplete analgesiaLow-dose epiduralsDouble-blind fashionSpinal-epidural techniqueOnset of analgesiaHealthy term parturientsAcademic medical centerSodium bicarbonate 8.4Additional analgesiaCSE analgesiaEpidural groupMotor blockadeMotor blockTerm parturientsEpidural techniqueLabor analgesiaParturients' satisfactionUniversity HospitalMaternal requestCSE groupAnalgesiaMedical CenterLabor floorOpioid mixtures
1998
Comparative Evaluation of Four Different Infusion Rates of Ropivacaine (2 mg/mL) for Epidural Labor Analgesia
Cascio M, Gaiser R, Camann W, Venkateswaran P, Hawkins J, McCarthy D. Comparative Evaluation of Four Different Infusion Rates of Ropivacaine (2 mg/mL) for Epidural Labor Analgesia. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 1998, 23: 548-553. DOI: 10.1097/00115550-199823060-00006.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsVisual analog pain scaleML/hourMotor blockLabor analgesiaInfusion ratePain reliefBolus dosageHours groupNeurological adaptive capacity scoresEpidural infusion rateLess motor blockAnalog pain scaleLumbar epidural catheterLabor pain managementEpidural labor analgesiaInstitutional review board approvalReview board approvalAdaptive capacity scoresDifferent infusion ratesSatisfactory labor analgesiaBromage scaleRescue analgesiaApgar scoreEpidural catheterMost patientsComparative evaluation of four different infusion rates of ropivacaine (2 mg/mL) for epidural labor analgesia
Cascio M, Gaiser R, Camann W, Venkateswaran P, Hawkins J, McCarthy D. Comparative evaluation of four different infusion rates of ropivacaine (2 mg/mL) for epidural labor analgesia. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 1998, 23: 548-553. PMID: 9840848, DOI: 10.1016/s1098-7339(98)90079-7.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsVisual analog pain scaleML/hourMotor blockLabor analgesiaInfusion ratePain reliefBolus dosageHours groupNeurological adaptive capacity scoresEpidural infusion rateLess motor blockAnalog pain scaleLumbar epidural catheterLabor pain managementEpidural labor analgesiaInstitutional review board approvalReview board approvalAdaptive capacity scoresDifferent infusion ratesSatisfactory labor analgesiaBromage scaleRescue analgesiaApgar scoreEpidural catheterMost patients