2005
Advancing an epidural catheter 10 cm then retracting it 5 cm is no more effective than advancing it 5 cm
Cartagena R, Gaiser R. Advancing an epidural catheter 10 cm then retracting it 5 cm is no more effective than advancing it 5 cm. Journal Of Clinical Anesthesia 2005, 17: 528-530. PMID: 16297752, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2005.08.002.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsEpidural catheterIntravascular placementSensory levelProspective Randomized StudyClear clinical benefitUniversity Medical CenterRandomized studyEpidural anesthesiaClinical benefitEpidural spaceMedical CenterCatheterParesthesiaDelivery unitFurther studiesPatientsGroupPlacementParturientsAnesthesiaHigh frequency
2000
Comparison of combined spinal-epidural and low dose epidural for labour analgesia
Hepner D, Gaiser R, Cheek T, Gutsche B. Comparison of combined spinal-epidural and low dose epidural for labour analgesia. Journal Canadien D'anesthésie 2000, 47: 232-236. PMID: 10730733, DOI: 10.1007/bf03018918.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAnalgesia, EpiduralAnalgesia, ObstetricalAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalBuffersBupivacaineChi-Square DistributionDouble-Blind MethodEpinephrineFemaleFentanylHumansInjections, SpinalMotor NeuronsNerve BlockPainPain MeasurementPatient SatisfactionPregnancyProspective StudiesSodium BicarbonateTime FactorsVasoconstrictor AgentsConceptsEpidural analgesiaComplete analgesiaLow-dose epiduralsDouble-blind fashionSpinal-epidural techniqueOnset of analgesiaHealthy term parturientsAcademic medical centerSodium bicarbonate 8.4Additional analgesiaCSE analgesiaEpidural groupMotor blockadeMotor blockTerm parturientsEpidural techniqueLabor analgesiaParturients' satisfactionUniversity HospitalMaternal requestCSE groupAnalgesiaMedical CenterLabor floorOpioid mixtures