2000
Should intrathecal lidocaine be used in the 21st century?
Gaiser R. Should intrathecal lidocaine be used in the 21st century? Journal Of Clinical Anesthesia 2000, 12: 476-481. PMID: 11090735, DOI: 10.1016/s0952-8180(00)00186-0.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCauda equina syndromeSingle-shot spinal anesthesiaSpinal anesthesiaContinuous spinal anesthesiaIntrathecal lidocaineSafe alternativeOutpatient spinal anesthesiaPermanent neurologic injuryTransient neurologic symptomsNeurologic symptomsNeurologic injuryBack painHyperbaric lidocaineGeneral anesthesiaLithotomy positionPermanent disabilityHyperbaric 5Intrathecal useLower incidenceSafe drugHigh incidenceAnesthesiaLidocaineShort proceduresSyndrome
1994
Epidural lidocaine versus 2-chloroprocaine for fetal distress requiring urgent cesarean section
Gaiser R, Cheek T, Gutsche B. Epidural lidocaine versus 2-chloroprocaine for fetal distress requiring urgent cesarean section. International Journal Of Obstetric Anesthesia 1994, 3: 208-210. PMID: 15636952, DOI: 10.1016/0959-289x(94)90070-1.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchUrgent cesarean sectionNeonatal Apgar scoresUrgent cesarean deliveryNeonatal umbilical cordAcidotic fetusesApgar scoreEpidural lidocaineCesarean sectionEpidural catheterCesarean deliveryFetal distressRetrospective reviewDistressed fetusesIncision timeUmbilical cordChloroprocaineDrug AdministrationQuick onsetLidocaineTreatment populationFetusesSodium bicarbonateOnsetCatheterCord