2014
Endovascular vs. Open Repair of Complicated Acute Type B Aortic Dissections
Hogendoorn W, Hunink MG, Schlösser FJ, Moll FL, Sumpio BE, Muhs BE. Endovascular vs. Open Repair of Complicated Acute Type B Aortic Dissections. Journal Of Endovascular Therapy 2014, 21: 503-514. PMID: 25101577, DOI: 10.1583/14-4716r.1.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAcute DiseaseAortic Aneurysm, ThoracicAortic DissectionComparative Effectiveness ResearchComputer SimulationDecision Support TechniquesEndovascular ProceduresEvidence-Based MedicineHumansMaleMarkov ChainsMiddle AgedPatient SelectionPostoperative ComplicationsQuality-Adjusted Life YearsReoperationRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeVascular Surgical ProceduresConceptsComplicated acute type B aortic dissectionThoracic endovascular aortic repairOpen surgical repairQuality-adjusted life yearsAcute type B aortic dissectionType B aortic dissectionB aortic dissectionAortic dissectionAge groupsNumber of reinterventionsEndovascular aortic repairAortic-related complicationsDifferent clinical scenariosProbabilistic sensitivity analysesPerioperative mortalityEndovascular repairAortic repairOpen repairSurgical repairRelative riskMAIN OUTCOMEAortic anatomyClinical scenariosLife yearsComparative effectiveness
2013
Fundamentals of randomized clinical trials in wound care: Reporting standards
Brölmann FE, Eskes AM, Sumpio BE, Mayer DO, Moore Z, Ågren M, Hermans M, Cutting K, Legemate DA, Vermeulen H, Ubbink DT. Fundamentals of randomized clinical trials in wound care: Reporting standards. Wound Repair And Regeneration 2013, 21: 641-647. PMID: 23937172, DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12087.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2012
Fundamentals of randomized clinical trials in wound care: Design and conduct
Eskes AM, Brölmann FE, Sumpio BE, Mayer D, Moore Z, Ågren M, Hermans M, Cutting K, Legemate DA, Ubbink DT, Vermeulen H. Fundamentals of randomized clinical trials in wound care: Design and conduct. Wound Repair And Regeneration 2012, 20: 449-455. PMID: 22642397, DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-475x.2012.00799.x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRandomized clinical trialsClinical trialsAdequate allocation concealmentWound care interventionsPatient-oriented outcomesStrong scientific evidenceQuality of studiesConduct of futureOutcome assessorsWound care productsTreat analysisCare decision makingAllocation concealmentCare interventionsWound careLower riskAcute woundsStudy designEvidence baseTrialsScientific evidenceTreatment effectsRobust comparative studiesCareSources of bias
2010
Meta-analysis of open versus endovascular repair for ruptured descending thoracic aortic aneurysm
Jonker FH, Trimarchi S, Verhagen HJ, Moll FL, Sumpio BE, Muhs BE. Meta-analysis of open versus endovascular repair for ruptured descending thoracic aortic aneurysm. Journal Of Vascular Surgery 2010, 51: 1026-1032.e2. PMID: 20347700, DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.10.103.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsOpen repairThoracic aortic aneurysmEndovascular repairAortic aneurysmMyocardial infarctionMortality rateEndovascular thoracic aortic aneurysm repairThoracic aortic aneurysm repairAneurysm-related survivalCochrane Library CENTRALOpen surgical repairAortic aneurysm repairExcerpta Medica Database (EMBASE) databasesHigh mortality rateParaplegia rateTEVAR groupType of repairAdditional patientsAneurysm repairSurgical repairMean ageContemporary outcomesTreatment outcomesTEVARSmall series
2009
The Semmes Weinstein monofilament examination as a screening tool for diabetic peripheral neuropathy
Feng Y, Schlösser FJ, Sumpio BE. The Semmes Weinstein monofilament examination as a screening tool for diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Journal Of Vascular Surgery 2009, 50: 675-682.e1. PMID: 19595541, DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.05.017.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSemmes-Weinstein monofilament examinationDiabetic peripheral neuropathyNerve conduction studiesNegative predictive valuePositive predictive valueDiagnostic valueMonofilament examinationPeripheral neuropathyDiabetes mellitusPredictive valueLower extremity amputationRisk of ulcerationPublication date restrictionsCurrent literatureReference testConduction studiesExtremity amputationPlantar aspectDate restrictionsCurrent evidenceFifth metatarsalGreat toePubMed databaseEarly interventionIndependent investigators
2003
An appraisal of different cardiac risk reduction strategies in vascular surgery patients
Kakisis JD, Abir F, Liapis CD, Sumpio BE. An appraisal of different cardiac risk reduction strategies in vascular surgery patients. European Journal Of Vascular And Endovascular Surgery 2003, 25: 493-504. PMID: 12787690, DOI: 10.1053/ejvs.2002.1851.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsCardiac Surgical ProceduresCardiovascular AgentsEvidence-Based MedicineHeart DiseasesHumansRisk FactorsRisk Reduction BehaviorVascular Surgical ProceduresConceptsVascular surgeryPerioperative mortalityVascular proceduresAvailable pharmacological agentsCardiac risk reductionCoronary artery bypassVascular surgery patientsLow-risk patientsMyocardial infarction ratePercutaneous transluminal angioplastyCalcium channel blockersArtery bypassCardiac morbidityCardiac mortalityCoronary revascularizationInfarction ratePerioperative outcomesSurgery patientsTransluminal angioplastyOverall mortalityCardiac riskCardioprotective effectsPerioperative settingChannel blockersOutcome measures