2019
Clinical outcome indicators in chronic hepatitis B and C: A primer for value‐based medicine in hepatology
Strazzabosco M, Cortesi P, Conti S, Okolicsanyi S, Rota M, Ciaccio A, Cozzolino P, Fornari C, Gemma M, Scalone L, Cesana G, Fabris L, Colledan M, Fagiuoli S, Ideo G, Zavaglia C, Perricone G, Munari L, Mantovani L, Belli L. Clinical outcome indicators in chronic hepatitis B and C: A primer for value‐based medicine in hepatology. Liver International 2019, 40: 60-73. PMID: 31654608, PMCID: PMC10916792, DOI: 10.1111/liv.14285.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAntiviral AgentsCarcinoma, HepatocellularFemaleGastroenterologyHepatitis B, ChronicHepatitis C, ChronicHumansItalyLiver CirrhosisLiver NeoplasmsLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesQuality Indicators, Health CareSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeValue-Based Health InsuranceConceptsClinical outcome indicatorsClinical practiceOutcome indicatorsChronic hepatitis BClinical practice settingMajor health problemCurrent international guidelinesNew effective treatmentsValue of careMETHODS/RESULTSHCV patientsHCV infectionHepatitis BClinical outcomesLiver diseaseMulticentre studyEffective treatmentHealth problemsInternational guidelinesCare deliveryValue-based medicineCostly treatmentPractice settingsHBVPatients
2018
Change in DSM‐5 Alcohol Use Disorder Criteria Count and Severity Level as a Treatment Outcome Indicator: Results from a Randomized Trial
Kiluk BD, Frankforter TL, Cusumano M, Nich C, Carroll KM. Change in DSM‐5 Alcohol Use Disorder Criteria Count and Severity Level as a Treatment Outcome Indicator: Results from a Randomized Trial. Alcohol Clinical And Experimental Research 2018, 42: 1556-1563. PMID: 29870051, PMCID: PMC6281805, DOI: 10.1111/acer.13807.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAlcohol use disorderRandomized clinical trialsClinical trialsSeverity categoriesOutcome indicatorsDSM criteriaCurrent AUD diagnosisPotential outcome indicatorsTreatment outcome indicatorsWeekly outpatient treatmentMost clinical trialsStructured Clinical InterviewLinear mixed modelsTreatment end pointsCognitive behavioral therapy programCriterion countsMeaningful outcome indicatorsBehavioral therapy programAlcohol use outcomesOutpatient treatmentTrend-level significanceMain trialDiagnostic criteriaUse disordersBetter outcomes
2015
Quality of Care for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Development of Canadian Cardiovascular Society Quality Indicators
Asgar A, Lauck S, Ko D, Alqoofi F, Cohen E, Forsey A, Lambert L, Oakes G, Pelletier M, Webb J, Group C. Quality of Care for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Development of Canadian Cardiovascular Society Quality Indicators. Canadian Journal Of Cardiology 2015, 32: 1038.e1-1038.e4. PMID: 26948037, DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.11.008.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAortic Valve StenosisCanadaHealth Services AccessibilityHospital MortalityHumansOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePatient Care TeamPatient ReadmissionPatient-Centered CarePostoperative ComplicationsQuality Indicators, Health CareQuality of Health CareQuality of LifeStrokeTime-to-TreatmentTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementWaiting ListsConceptsQuality of careQuality indicatorsCanadian Cardiovascular SocietyEvaluation of quality of careMeasure quality of careTranscatheter aortic valve implantationWorking GroupNational quality assuranceOutcome indicatorsClinical careQuality reportingCareMeasure qualityProgram coordinatorsQuality InitiativeGovernment agency representativesAgency representativesConsensus agreementCardiovascular SocietyAortic valve implantationNational strategyAortic stenosisValve implantationCanadianMultiple stakeholders
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply