2015
Current Concepts of Bone Tissue Engineering for Craniofacial Bone Defect Repair
Fishero B, Kohli N, Das A, Christophel J, Cui Q. Current Concepts of Bone Tissue Engineering for Craniofacial Bone Defect Repair. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction 2015, 08: 023-030. PMID: 25709750, PMCID: PMC4329034, DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1393724.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchSynthetic scaffoldsHeal critical-size bone defectsStem cellsBone tissue engineeringGrowth factorCritical-sized bone defectsAblative oncologic surgeryBone defect repairConcept of bone tissue engineeringFree tissue transferDonor site morbidityIncreased health care costsMethod of repairInnate complicationsScaffold compositionOncologic surgeryTissue engineeringCraniofacial fracturesRegeneration of boneSite morbidityTissue transferBony defectsPlate extrusionRigid fixationDelivery techniques
2014
Costs of repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm with different devices in a multicenter randomized trial
Matsumura JS, Stroupe KT, Lederle FA, Kyriakides TC, Ge L, Freischlag JA, Ketteler E, Kingsley D, Marek J, Massen R, Matteson B, Pitcher J, Langsfeld M, Corson J, Goff J, Kasirajan K, Paap C, Robertson D, Salam A, Veeraswamy R, Milner R, Kasirajan K, Guidot J, Lal B, Busuttil S, Lilly M, Braganza M, Ellis K, Patterson M, Jordan W, Whitley D, Taylor S, Passman M, Kerns D, Inman C, Poirier J, Ebaugh J, Raffetto J, Chew D, Lathi S, Owens C, Hickson K, Dosluoglu H, Eschberger K, Kibbe M, Baraniewski H, Matsumura J, Endo M, Busman A, Meadows W, Evans M, Giglia J, Sayed H, Reed A, Ruf M, Ross S, Jean-Claude J, Pinault G, Kang P, White N, Eiseman M, Jones R, Timaran C, Modrall J, Welborn M, Lopez J, Nguyen T, Chacko J, Granke K, Vouyouka A, Olgren E, Chand P, Allende B, Ranella M, Yales C, Whitehill T, Krupski W, Nehler M, Johnson S, Jones D, Strecker P, Bhola M, Shortell C, Gray J, Lawson J, McCann R, Sebastian M, Tetterton J, Blackwell C, Prinzo P, Lee N, Padberg F, Cerveira J, Lal B, Zickler R, Hauck K, Berceli S, Lee W, Ozaki C, Nelson P, Irwin A, Baum R, Aulivola B, Rodriguez H, Littooy F, Greisler H, O'Sullivan M, Kougias P, Lin P, Bush R, Guinn G, Cagiannos C, Pillack S, Guillory B, Cikrit D, Lalka S, Lemmon G, Nachreiner R, Rusomaroff M, O'Brien E, Cullen J, Hoballah J, Sharp W, McCandless J, Beach V, Minion D, Schwarcz T, Kimbrough J, Ashe L, Rockich A, Warner-Carpenter J, Moursi M, Eidt J, Brock S, Bianchi C, Bishop V, Gordon I, Fujitani R, Kubaska S, Behdad M, Azadegan R, Agas C, Zalecki K, Hoch J, Carr S, Acher C, Schwarze M, Tefera G, Mell M, Dunlap B, Rieder J, Stuart J, Weiman D, Abul-Khoudoud O, Garrett H, Walsh S, Wilson K, Seabrook G, Cambria R, Brown K, Lewis B, Framberg S, Kallio C, Barke R, Santilli S, d'Audiffret A, Oberle N, Proebstle C, Johnson L, Jacobowitz G, Cayne N, Rockman C, Adelman M, Gagne P, Nalbandian M, Caropolo L, Pipinos I, Johanning J, Lynch T, DeSpiegelaere H, Purviance G, Zhou W, Dalman R, Lee J, Safadi B, Coogan S, Wren S, Bahmani D, Maples D, Thunen S, Golden M, Mitchell M, Fairman R, Reinhardt S, Wilson M, Tzeng E, Muluk S, Peterson N, Foster M, Edwards J, Moneta G, Landry G, Taylor L, Yeager R, Cannady E, Treiman G, Hatton-Ward S, Salabsky B, Kansal N, Owens E, Estes M, Forbes B, Sobotta C, Rapp J, Reilly L, Perez S, Yan K, Sarkar R, Dwyer S, Kohler T, Hatsukami T, Glickerman D, Sobel M, Burdick T, Pedersen K, Cleary P, Kansal N, Owens E, Estes M, Forbes B, Sobotta C, Back M, Bandyk D, Johnson B, Shames M, Reinhard R, Thomas S, Hunter G, Leon L, Westerband A, Guerra R, Riveros M, Mills J, Hughes J, Escalante A, Psalms S, Day N, Macsata R, Sidawy A, Weiswasser J, Arora S, Jasper B, Dardik A, Gahtan V, Muhs B, Sumpio B, Gusberg R, Spector M, Pollak J, Aruny J, Kelly E, Wong J, Vasilas P, Joncas C, Gelabert H, DeVirgillio C, Rigberg D, Cole L. Costs of repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm with different devices in a multicenter randomized trial. Journal Of Vascular Surgery 2014, 61: 59-65.e2. PMID: 25238728, PMCID: PMC12123633, DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.08.003.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAortic Aneurysm, AbdominalBlood Vessel ProsthesisBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationEndovascular ProceduresHealth Care CostsHealth ExpendituresHospital CostsHumansLength of StayProsthesis DesignStentsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsConceptsTotal health care costsHealth care costsEndovascular repairAbdominal aortic aneurysmHealth care providersCare costsAneurysm repairAortic aneurysmVA costsAbdominal aortic aneurysm repairPatient's health care providersVeterans Affairs Cooperative StudyImplant costsHealth care utilization dataVA Health Economics Resource CenterOpen repair cohortsOpen repair groupAortic aneurysm repairEndovascular aneurysm repairInitial hospitalization costsHealth care system expendituresLower mean costQuality of lifeMean deviceMethod of repair
2013
Strategy for the Management of Complex Retinal Detachments The European Vitreo-Retinal Society Retinal Detachment Study Report 2
Adelman RA, Parnes AJ, Sipperley JO, Ducournau D, Group E. Strategy for the Management of Complex Retinal Detachments The European Vitreo-Retinal Society Retinal Detachment Study Report 2. Ophthalmology 2013, 120: 1809-1813. PMID: 23601805, DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.01.056.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRhegmatogenous retinal detachmentGiant retinal tearsRetinal detachmentScleral buckleComplex retinal detachmentChoroidal detachmentRetinal tearsGrade CGrade B proliferative vitreoretinopathyLow failure rateComplex rhegmatogenous retinal detachmentRetinal detachment repairFailure rateProcedure of choiceSignificant differencesMethod of repairSignificant hypotonyClinical manifestationsDetachment repairGiant tearsRetrospective studyMacular holePrimary procedureProliferative vitreoretinopathyLarge tearsStrategy for the Management of Uncomplicated Retinal Detachments The European Vitreo-Retinal Society Retinal Detachment Study Report 1
Adelman RA, Parnes AJ, Ducournau D, Group E. Strategy for the Management of Uncomplicated Retinal Detachments The European Vitreo-Retinal Society Retinal Detachment Study Report 1. Ophthalmology 2013, 120: 1804-1808. PMID: 23601799, DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.01.070.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRhegmatogenous retinal detachmentUncomplicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachmentScleral buckle groupRetinal detachmentScleral buckleFinal failure rateSingle-surgery reattachment rateCases of RRDBenefit of vitrectomyMulticenter retrospective studyRetinal detachment repairUncomplicated retinal detachmentsSpecific clinical findingsFailure ratePhakic retinal detachmentSignificant differencesMethod of repairAphakic groupPhakic patientsVitrectomy groupUncomplicated casesClinical findingsDetachment repairPseudophakic patientsReattachment rate
2003
Arthroscopic versus mini-open salvage repair of the rotator cuff tear: outcome analysis at 2 to 6 years’ follow-up
Kim S, Ha K, Park J, Kang J, Oh S, Oh I. Arthroscopic versus mini-open salvage repair of the rotator cuff tear: outcome analysis at 2 to 6 years’ follow-up. Arthroscopy The Journal Of Arthroscopic And Related Surgery 2003, 19: 746-754. PMID: 12966383, DOI: 10.1016/s0749-8063(03)00395-5.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRotator cuff tearsFull-thickness rotator cuff tearsArthroscopic repairShoulder ScoreCuff tearsLarge full-thickness rotator cuff tearsMini-open repair techniqueCalifornia Los Angeles scaleLos Angeles scaleRetrospective case seriesMini-open repairLarge Rotator CuffRange of motionMethod of repairCalifornia Los AngelesAcromioclavicular arthritisPostoperative painSalvage groupElbow SurgeonsAmerican ShoulderCase seriesSurgical outcomesMean agePatient satisfactionSubscapularis tears
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply