2023
Long-term outcomes of periprocedural coronary dissection and perforation for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in a Japanese multicenter registry
Kuno T, Ohata T, Nakamaru R, Sawano M, Kodaira M, Numasawa Y, Ueda I, Suzuki M, Noma S, Fukuda K, Kohsaka S. Long-term outcomes of periprocedural coronary dissection and perforation for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in a Japanese multicenter registry. Scientific Reports 2023, 13: 20318. PMID: 37985895, PMCID: PMC10662469, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-47444-7.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPercutaneous coronary interventionLong-term outcomesCoronary dissectionPrimary endpointCoronary perforationCoronary interventionHeart failurePrimary outcomeMultivariable Cox hazards regression modelIndex percutaneous coronary interventionCox hazard regression modelPoor long-term outcomesIatrogenic coronary dissectionJapanese multicenter registryMulticenter prospective registryCoronary artery bypassAcute coronary syndromeHeart failure readmissionContrast medium extravasationHazards regression modelsPersistent filling defectSignificant differencesHigh rateCause deathArtery bypass
2021
Temporal Changes and Institutional Variation in Use of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease in the United States
Secemsky EA, Butala N, Raja A, Khera R, Wang Y, Curtis JP, Maddox TM, Virani SS, Armstrong EJ, Shunk KA, Brindis RG, Bhatt D, Yeh RW. Temporal Changes and Institutional Variation in Use of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease in the United States. JAMA Cardiology 2021, 6: 574-580. PMID: 33146666, PMCID: PMC7643043, DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.5354.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMV-percutaneous coronary interventionST-elevation myocardial infarctionMultivessel percutaneous coronary interventionPercutaneous coronary interventionMajor epicardial vesselsPCI useMV diseaseCoronary interventionIndex procedureMyocardial infarctionSTEMI admissionsEpicardial vesselsNational Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI RegistryIndex percutaneous coronary interventionMore major epicardial vesselsMultivessel coronary artery diseaseCoronary stentsSmall randomized studiesDays of dischargeCoronary artery diseaseMinority of patientsIndex admissionNonculprit lesionsCathPCI RegistryComplete revascularization
2020
Beta blockers versus calcium channel blockers for provocation of vasospastic angina after drug-eluting stent implantation: a multicentre prospective randomised trial
Sawano M, Katsuki T, Kitai T, Tamita K, Obunai K, Ikegami Y, Yamane T, Ueda I, Endo A, Maekawa Y, Kawamura A, Fukuda K, Kohsaka S. Beta blockers versus calcium channel blockers for provocation of vasospastic angina after drug-eluting stent implantation: a multicentre prospective randomised trial. Open Heart 2020, 7: e001406. PMID: 33087441, PMCID: PMC7580072, DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001406.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAgedAged, 80 and overAngina PectorisCalcium Channel BlockersCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VasospasmDrug-Eluting StentsFemaleHumansIncidenceJapanMaleMiddle AgedPercutaneous Coronary InterventionProspective StudiesProtective FactorsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeConceptsMajor cardiovascular eventsPercutaneous coronary interventionCalcium channel blockersCoronary artery diseaseStable coronary artery diseaseDrug-eluting stent implantationAcetylcholine provocation testingDiagnostic coronary angiographyBeta blockersCCB groupArtery diseaseCoronary angiographyVasospastic anginaCoronary revascularisationProvocation testingStent implantationChannel blockersSecond-generation drug-eluting stent implantationUniversity Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials RegistryIndex percutaneous coronary interventionNon-fatal myocardial infarctionSingle-vessel lesionsSubsequent coronary eventsCoronary artery spasmClinical Trials RegistryAttribution of Adverse Events Following Coronary Stent Placement Identified Using Administrative Claims Data
Dhruva SS, Parzynski CS, Gamble GM, Curtis JP, Desai NR, Yeh RW, Masoudi FA, Kuntz R, Shaw RE, Marinac‐Dabic D, Sedrakyan A, Normand S, Krumholz HM, Ross JS. Attribution of Adverse Events Following Coronary Stent Placement Identified Using Administrative Claims Data. Journal Of The American Heart Association 2020, 9: e013606. PMID: 32063087, PMCID: PMC7070203, DOI: 10.1161/jaha.119.013606.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdministrative Claims, HealthcareAgedAged, 80 and overCoronary RestenosisCoronary ThrombosisDatabases, FactualDrug-Eluting StentsFemaleHumansMaleMedicareMyocardial InfarctionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingRegistriesRetreatmentRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesConceptsIndex percutaneous coronary interventionPercutaneous coronary interventionSame coronary arteryDrug-eluting stentsNCDR CathPCI RegistrySubsequent percutaneous coronary interventionAcute myocardial infarctionCoronary arteryClaims dataCathPCI RegistryAdverse eventsIndex procedureMyocardial infarctionRepeat percutaneous coronary interventionReal-world registry dataTarget vessel revascularizationCoronary stent placementAdministrative claims dataLong-term safetyLongitudinal claims dataPotential safety eventsVessel revascularizationCoronary interventionDES placementStent thrombosis
2019
Comparison of Machine Learning Methods With National Cardiovascular Data Registry Models for Prediction of Risk of Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Mortazavi BJ, Bucholz EM, Desai NR, Huang C, Curtis JP, Masoudi FA, Shaw RE, Negahban SN, Krumholz HM. Comparison of Machine Learning Methods With National Cardiovascular Data Registry Models for Prediction of Risk of Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. JAMA Network Open 2019, 2: e196835. PMID: 31290991, PMCID: PMC6624806, DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6835.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPercutaneous coronary interventionMajor bleedingC-statisticCoronary interventionMAIN OUTCOMEIndex percutaneous coronary interventionSubsequent coronary artery bypassPercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) proceduresHospital major bleedingMajor bleeding ratesNationwide clinical registryCoronary artery bypassCoronary intervention proceduresComparative effectiveness studiesRisk score modelComplexity of presentationMean c-statisticCoronary angiography dataRegistry modelNCDR modelsArtery bypassBleeding eventsPrediction of riskClinical variablesBleeding rate
2017
Prognostic Impact of Subsequent Acute Coronary Syndrome and Unplanned Revascularization on Long‐Term Mortality After an Index Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report From a Japanese Multicenter Registry
Inohara T, Kohsaka S, Miyata H, Sawano M, Ueda I, Maekawa Y, Fukuda K, Jones PG, Cohen DJ, Zhao Z, Spertus JA, Smolderen KG. Prognostic Impact of Subsequent Acute Coronary Syndrome and Unplanned Revascularization on Long‐Term Mortality After an Index Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report From a Japanese Multicenter Registry. Journal Of The American Heart Association 2017, 6: e006529. PMID: 29079567, PMCID: PMC5721753, DOI: 10.1161/jaha.117.006529.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAcute Coronary SyndromeAgedAngina, UnstableChi-Square DistributionFemaleHospitals, TeachingHumansIncidenceJapanLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPropensity ScoreProportional Hazards ModelsRegistriesRetreatmentRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeConceptsSubsequent acute coronary syndromeAcute coronary syndromePercutaneous coronary interventionPropensity-matched cohortUnplanned coronary revascularizationIndex percutaneous coronary interventionComposite end pointUnplanned revascularizationCoronary revascularizationCoronary syndromeCoronary interventionUnstable anginaClinical trialsEnd pointJapanese multicenter registryLong-term mortalityAcute myocardial infarctionRisk of mortalityProportional hazards modelLong-term survivalJapanese teaching hospitalsCause mortalityMulticenter registryPCI patientsSubsequent survival
2016
Angiographic predictors of 2‐year stent thrombosis in patients receiving drug‐eluting stents: Insights from the ADAPT‐DES study
Généreux P, Redfors B, Witzenbichler B, Maehara A, Yadav M, Weisz G, Francese DP, Parvataneni R, Brener SJ, Mehran R, Kirtane AJ, Stone GW. Angiographic predictors of 2‐year stent thrombosis in patients receiving drug‐eluting stents: Insights from the ADAPT‐DES study. Catheterization And Cardiovascular Interventions 2016, 89: 26-35. PMID: 26813732, DOI: 10.1002/ccd.26409.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedCase-Control StudiesCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary ThrombosisDrug Therapy, CombinationDrug-Eluting StentsFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPlatelet ActivationPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPlatelet Function TestsPredictive Value of TestsProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRegistriesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesConceptsADAPT-DES studyPercutaneous coronary interventionPresence of thrombusStent thrombosisDrug-eluting stentsAngiographic predictorsCardiology/American Heart Association type C lesionsCases of STIndependent angiographic core laboratoryIndex percutaneous coronary interventionMulticenter ADAPT-DES studyMultivariable Cox regression modelsSuccessful percutaneous coronary interventionDetailed angiographic analysisLong target lesionPre-specified analysisType C lesionsAcademic Research ConsortiumSaphenous vein graftsCox regression modelAngiographic core laboratoryADAPT-DESAngiographic variablesCoronary interventionSevere calcification
2009
All-Cause Readmission and Repeat Revascularization After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in a Cohort of Medicare Patients
Curtis JP, Schreiner G, Wang Y, Chen J, Spertus JA, Rumsfeld JS, Brindis RG, Krumholz HM. All-Cause Readmission and Repeat Revascularization After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in a Cohort of Medicare Patients. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2009, 54: 903-907. PMID: 19712799, DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.076.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPercutaneous coronary interventionReadmission ratesRevascularization proceduresCause readmissionCoronary interventionPCI proceduresMortality rateIndex percutaneous coronary interventionAcute myocardial infarction patientsCause readmission rateIndex PCI procedureMedian readmission rateDays of dischargeRepeat revascularization proceduresMyocardial infarction patientsNon-AMI patientsPCI patientsRepeat revascularizationRevascularization ratesPrimary outcomeInfarction patientsSuch readmissionsMedicare patientsRetrospective analysisReadmission
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply