2024
Parent decisional regret regarding neonatal circumcision in an American outpatient pediatric urology clinic
Brutus N, Howe A, Rehfuss A, Giramonti K, Feustel P, Kogan B. Parent decisional regret regarding neonatal circumcision in an American outpatient pediatric urology clinic. Journal Of Pediatric Urology 2024, 20: 1192-1199. PMID: 39153922, DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.07.018.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchDecisional Regret ScalePediatric urology clinicRegret scoresModerate to strong regretNeonatal circumcisionUrology clinicCircumcision statusSurrogate decision makersRecruitment of participantsParent groupsParental decisional regretPhysician counselingDecisional regretParental regretStrong regretSurveyed parentsRegret ScaleIndependent decision makingCircumcision revisionOutcome variablesDecision makingPopulation studiesUncircumcised penisParental decisionsMedian 0Decision-making in women who considered planned oocyte cryopreservation: decision satisfaction or regret?
Korkidakis A, Martinez S, Sabbagh R, Heyward Q, Sakkas D, Domar A, Toth T. Decision-making in women who considered planned oocyte cryopreservation: decision satisfaction or regret? Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2024, 50: 103944. PMID: 39799100, DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.103944.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPlanned OCPlanned oocyte cryopreservationOocyte cryopreservationDecision Regret ScaleDecision Regret Scale scoresDecision regretCryopreserved oocytesDonor spermREDCap platformMultivariate modelEligibility criteriaReproductive plansProportion of respondentsDRS scoresDecreased numberWomenRegret ScaleOocytesCryopreservationScoresGroup
2023
Patient preferences, regret, and health-related quality of life among older adults with acute myeloid leukemia: A pilot longitudinal study
LoCastro M, Wang Y, Sanapala C, Jensen-Battaglia M, Wittink M, Norton S, Klepin H, Richardson D, Mendler J, Liesveld J, Huselton E, Loh K. Patient preferences, regret, and health-related quality of life among older adults with acute myeloid leukemia: A pilot longitudinal study. Journal Of Geriatric Oncology 2023, 14: 101529. PMID: 37244139, PMCID: PMC10288066, DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101529.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHealth-related quality of lifeHealth-related qualityOlder adultsDecisional regretQuality of lifeAcute myeloid leukemiaBest-worst scalingPatient preferencesInitial treatment decisionsPreferences of older adultsDecisional Regret ScaleEQ-5D-5LMyeloid leukemiaTreatment decisionsLocation of treatmentPatient prioritiesHRQoL scoresAttributes of treatmentDiagnosed AMLIntensive treatmentAssociated with poor outcomesRegret ScaleAge of patientsHRQoLResponse to treatmentA Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate an Atrial Fibrillation Stroke Prevention Shared Decision‐Making Pathway
Wang P, Lu Y, Mahaffey K, Lin A, Morin D, Sears S, Chung M, Russo A, Lin B, Piccini J, Hills M, Berube C, Pundi K, Baykaner T, Garay G, Lhamo K, Rice E, Pourshams I, Shah R, Newswanger P, DeSutter K, Nunes J, Albert M, Schulman K, Heidenreich P, Bunch T, Sanders L, Turakhia M, Verghese A, Stafford R. A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate an Atrial Fibrillation Stroke Prevention Shared Decision‐Making Pathway. Journal Of The American Heart Association 2023, 12: e028562. PMID: 36342828, PMCID: PMC9973612, DOI: 10.1161/jaha.122.028562.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsDecision Conflict ScaleDecision Regret ScaleDecisional conflictUsual careRegret ScaleConflict ScaleMedian scorePatient-centered designHealth communication principlesPatient decisional conflictComparative effectiveness trialAtrial fibrillationDigital decision aidDecision-making pathwaysClinically meaningful reductionsPatient-clinicianEffectiveness trialDecision aidRandomized clinical trialsSecondary outcomesSecondary end pointsCareStudy populationMeaningful reductionsParticipants
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply