2020
Association of Event-Free and Distant Recurrence–Free Survival With Individual-Level Pathologic Complete Response in Neoadjuvant Treatment of Stages 2 and 3 Breast Cancer
Consortium I, Yee D, DeMichele A, Yau C, Isaacs C, Symmans W, Albain K, Chen Y, Krings G, Wei S, Harada S, Datnow B, Fadare O, Klein M, Pambuccian S, Chen B, Adamson K, Sams S, Mhawech-Fauceglia P, Magliocco A, Feldman M, Rendi M, Sattar H, Zeck J, Ocal I, Tawfik O, LeBeau L, Sahoo S, Vinh T, Chien A, Forero-Torres A, Stringer-Reasor E, Wallace A, Pusztai L, Boughey J, Ellis E, Elias A, Lu J, Lang J, Han H, Clark A, Nanda R, Northfelt D, Khan Q, Viscusi R, Euhus D, Edmiston K, Chui S, Kemmer K, Park J, Liu M, Olopade O, Leyland-Jones B, Tripathy D, Moulder S, Rugo H, Schwab R, Lo S, Helsten T, Beckwith H, Haugen P, Hylton N, Veer L, Perlmutter J, Melisko M, Wilson A, Peterson G, Asare A, Buxton M, Paoloni M, Clennell J, Hirst G, Singhrao R, Steeg K, Matthews J, Asare S, Sanil A, Berry S, Esserman L, Berry D. Association of Event-Free and Distant Recurrence–Free Survival With Individual-Level Pathologic Complete Response in Neoadjuvant Treatment of Stages 2 and 3 Breast Cancer. JAMA Oncology 2020, 6: 1355-1362. PMID: 32701140, PMCID: PMC7378873, DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.2535.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsBridged-Ring CompoundsCyclophosphamideDisease-Free SurvivalDoxorubicinFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProgression-Free SurvivalProportional Hazards ModelsReceptor, ErbB-2TaxoidsTrastuzumabTreatment OutcomeConceptsDistant recurrence-free survivalPathologic complete responseEvent-free survivalI-SPY2 trialRecurrence-free survivalLong-term outcomesBreast cancerComplete responseNeoadjuvant therapyPlatform trialsMolecular subtypesHigh-risk operable breast cancerThree-year event-free survivalHormone receptorsClinical stage 2Phase 3 confirmatory trialOperable breast cancerSubpopulation of womenNovel therapeutic combinationsStage 2Investigational regimensNeoadjuvant treatmentPrior surgeryTaxane treatmentStandard therapy
2016
Adaptive Randomization of Veliparib–Carboplatin Treatment in Breast Cancer
Rugo HS, Olopade OI, DeMichele A, Yau C, van 't Veer LJ, Buxton MB, Hogarth M, Hylton NM, Paoloni M, Perlmutter J, Symmans WF, Yee D, Chien AJ, Wallace AM, Kaplan HG, Boughey JC, Haddad TC, Albain KS, Liu MC, Isaacs C, Khan QJ, Lang JE, Viscusi RK, Pusztai L, Moulder SL, Chui SY, Kemmer KA, Elias AD, Edmiston KK, Euhus DM, Haley BB, Nanda R, Northfelt DW, Tripathy D, Wood WC, Ewing C, Schwab R, Lyandres J, Davis SE, Hirst GL, Sanil A, Berry DA, Esserman LJ. Adaptive Randomization of Veliparib–Carboplatin Treatment in Breast Cancer. New England Journal Of Medicine 2016, 375: 23-34. PMID: 27406347, PMCID: PMC5259561, DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1513749.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPathological complete responseHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2Triple-negative breast cancerStandard therapyComplete responseBreast cancerBiomarker subtypesExperimental regimensEpidermal growth factor receptor 2I-SPY 2Triple-negative populationCompletion of chemotherapyPrimary end pointPhase 3 trialStandard neoadjuvant chemotherapyGrowth factor receptor 2HER2-negative tumorsAdaptive randomizationBiomarker signaturesTumor volume changesFactor receptor 2Phase 2Carboplatin groupNeoadjuvant trialsNeoadjuvant chemotherapy
2013
Developing Safety Criteria for Introducing New Agents into Neoadjuvant Trials
DeMichele A, Berry DA, Zujewski J, Hunsberger S, Rubinstein L, Tomaszewski JE, Kelloff G, Perlmutter J, Buxton M, Lyandres J, Albain KS, Benz C, Chien AJ, Haluska P, Leyland-Jones B, Liu MC, Munster P, Olopade O, Park JW, Parker BA, Pusztai L, Tripathy D, Rugo H, Yee D, Esserman L. Developing Safety Criteria for Introducing New Agents into Neoadjuvant Trials. Clinical Cancer Research 2013, 19: 2817-2823. PMID: 23470967, PMCID: PMC4096560, DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-12-2620.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNeoadjuvant trialsNeoadjuvant settingStandard therapyInvestigational agentsDrug developmentPhase II neoadjuvant trialI-SPY2 trialSafe drug developmentShort-term endpointsNeoadjuvant studiesCurable patientsPathologic responsePoor prognosisNovel therapiesBreast cancerNovel agentsSafety dataStudy populationDisease processEfficacious drugsNew agentsDrug AdministrationPatient exposurePatient safetyStudy design
2011
P2-02-01: A Novel Inflammatory Breast Cancer-Specific Oncogene, Tazarotene-Induced Gene 1, Promotes Tumorigenicity and Invasiveness through the Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Axl.
Wang X, Saso H, Iwamoto T, Pusztai L, Gong Y, Woodward W, Reuben J, Hortobagyi G, Ueno N. P2-02-01: A Novel Inflammatory Breast Cancer-Specific Oncogene, Tazarotene-Induced Gene 1, Promotes Tumorigenicity and Invasiveness through the Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Axl. Cancer Research 2011, 71: p2-02-01-p2-02-01. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs11-p2-02-01.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchInflammatory breast cancerReceptor tyrosine kinase AXLTIG1 expressionTyrosine kinase AXLBreast cancerSUM149 cellsTumor growthEffective standard therapyNon-IBC cell linesPrognosis of patientsTreatment of patientsMammary fat padMatrix metalloproteinase-9Athymic nude miceIBC cell linesCell linesIBC cellsStandard therapyGene 1 expressionMolecular mechanismsDownregulation of expressionAxl expressionClinical subtypesMetalloproteinase-9Malignant process
2010
Impact of Progression During Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Surgical Management of Breast Cancer
Caudle AS, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Hunt KK, Pusztai L, Kuerer HM, Mittendorf EA, Hortobagyi GN, Meric-Bernstam F. Impact of Progression During Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Surgical Management of Breast Cancer. Annals Of Surgical Oncology 2010, 18: 932-938. PMID: 21061075, PMCID: PMC4347926, DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1390-8.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, LobularChemotherapy, AdjuvantCombined Modality TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphatic MetastasisMastectomyMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeConceptsBreast conservation therapyNeoadjuvant chemotherapyBreast cancerSurgical managementDisease progressionStable diseaseImpact of progressionAdvanced breast cancerEarly-stage diseaseBCT candidatesClinical lymphadenopathyChemotherapy regimensProgressive diseaseStandard therapyComplete responseMedical oncologistsDistant metastasisClinicopathological dataFlap closurePatientsStage ITherapeutic interventionsOperative planEarly identificationMastectomy
2006
Phase I study to determine the safety of oral administration of TAS-102 on a twice daily (BID) schedule for five days a week (wk) followed by two days rest for two wks, every (Q) four wks in patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (MBC)
Green M, Pusztai L, Theriault R, Adinin R, Hofweber M, Fukushima M, Mita A, Bindra N, Hortobagyi G. Phase I study to determine the safety of oral administration of TAS-102 on a twice daily (BID) schedule for five days a week (wk) followed by two days rest for two wks, every (Q) four wks in patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2006, 24: 10576-10576. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.10576.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMetastatic breast cancerPhase II doseBID days 1TAS-102Dose levelsBreast cancerDay 1Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicityEvaluable metastatic breast cancerInitial starting doseNon-hematologic toxicitiesInitial dose levelAdditional dose levelsHighest dose levelEvaluation of responseMinimal alopeciaHematologic toxicityStarting doseDaily dosingStandard therapyOral combinationStudy doseClinical activityOral administrationGrade 3