2021
Development and Validation of a Model to Predict Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Major Depression After a Motor Vehicle Collision
Ziobrowski HN, Kennedy CJ, Ustun B, House SL, Beaudoin FL, An X, Zeng D, Bollen KA, Petukhova M, Sampson NA, Puac-Polanco V, Lee S, Koenen KC, Ressler KJ, McLean SA, Kessler RC, Stevens J, Neylan T, Clifford G, Jovanovic T, Linnstaedt S, Germine L, Rauch S, Haran J, Storrow A, Lewandowski C, Musey P, Hendry P, Sheikh S, Jones C, Punches B, Lyons M, Murty V, McGrath M, Pascual J, Seamon M, Datner E, Chang A, Pearson C, Peak D, Jambaulikar G, Merchant R, Domeier R, Rathlev N, O’Neil B, Sergot P, Sanchez L, Bruce S, Pietrzak R, Joormann J, Barch D, Pizzagalli D, Sheridan J, Harte S, Elliott J, van Rooij S. Development and Validation of a Model to Predict Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Major Depression After a Motor Vehicle Collision. JAMA Psychiatry 2021, 78: 1228-1237. PMID: 34468741, PMCID: PMC8411364, DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.2427.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAccidents, TrafficAdolescentAdultAgedDepressive Disorder, MajorEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalPrognosisPsychological TraumaPsychometricsRisk AssessmentStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticWounds and InjuriesYoung AdultConceptsMajor depressive episodePosttraumatic stress disorderEmergency departmentUrban emergency departmentMotor vehicle collisionsSurvey 2 weeksDepressive episodeED assessmentMAIN OUTCOMEHigh riskPatientsPreventive interventionsED reportsPTSD ChecklistStress disorderSubstantial proportionLongitudinal studyVehicle collisionsDSM-5Prognostic reportsTraumatic eventsWeeksMonthsTraumatic experiencesReport
2003
Assumptions and Consequences of Treating Providers in Therapy Studies as Fixed Versus Random Effects:: Reply to Crits-Christoph, Tu, and Gallop (2003) and Serlin, Wampold, and Levin (2003)
Siemer M, Joormann J. Assumptions and Consequences of Treating Providers in Therapy Studies as Fixed Versus Random Effects:: Reply to Crits-Christoph, Tu, and Gallop (2003) and Serlin, Wampold, and Levin (2003). Psychological Methods 2003, 8: 535-544. PMID: 14664688, DOI: 10.1037/1082-989x.8.4.535.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPower and Measures of Effect Size in Analysis of Variance With Fixed Versus Random Nested Factors
Siemer M, Joormann J. Power and Measures of Effect Size in Analysis of Variance With Fixed Versus Random Nested Factors. Psychological Methods 2003, 8: 497-517. PMID: 14664685, DOI: 10.1037/1082-989x.8.4.497.Peer-Reviewed Original Research