2021
Does Choice of Steroid Matter for Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain with Sacroiliac Joint Injections: a Retrospective Study
Krishnan R, Kurup V, Vadivelu N, Dai F, Zhou B, Rajput K. Does Choice of Steroid Matter for Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain with Sacroiliac Joint Injections: a Retrospective Study. Current Pain And Headache Reports 2021, 25: 34. PMID: 33760993, DOI: 10.1007/s11916-021-00942-7.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsChronic low back painLow back painSIJ injectionsTAC groupPain reliefMTP groupBack painSacroiliac jointOpiate useInstitutional IRB approvalModerate-quality evidenceRetrospective chart reviewStatistical differenceSacroiliac joint injectionsSource of painResultsSixty-five percentType of steroidPurpose of ReviewPrevalenceSIJ painChart reviewPain physiciansJoint injectionsRetrospective studySteroid preparationsQuality evidenceCan we increase the subjective well-being of the general population? An umbrella review of the evidence
Solanes A, Albajes-Eizagirre A, Fullana M, Fortea L, Fusar-Poli P, Torrent C, Solé B, Bonnín C, Shin J, Vieta E, Radua J. Can we increase the subjective well-being of the general population? An umbrella review of the evidence. Spanish Journal Of Psychiatry And Mental Health 2021, 14: 50-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.rpsmen.2021.02.001.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPositive psychology interventionsSubjective well-beingRandomized Controlled TrialsIncrease SWBUmbrella reviewGeneral populationNegative affectPositive affectUmbrella review of systematic reviewsComponents of subjective well-beingIncrease of positive affectReview of systematic reviewsMeta-analyses of RCTsWell-beingModerate-quality evidenceInduced small decreasesMeta-analytic statisticsPsychological interventionsPracticing gratitudeRecommendations AssessmentLife satisfactionAffectSystematic reviewMeta-analysesControlled Trials
2020
Can we increase the subjective well-being of the general population? An umbrella review of the evidence
Solanes A, Albajes-Eizagirre A, Fullana M, Fortea L, Fusar-Poli P, Torrent C, Solé B, Bonnín C, Shin J, Vieta E, Radua J. Can we increase the subjective well-being of the general population? An umbrella review of the evidence. Spanish Journal Of Psychiatry And Mental Health 2020, 14: 50-64. PMID: 33160879, DOI: 10.1016/j.rpsm.2020.08.002.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPositive psychology interventionsSubjective well-beingRandomized Controlled TrialsIncrease SWBUmbrella reviewGeneral populationNegative affectPositive affectUmbrella review of systematic reviewsComponents of subjective well-beingIncrease of positive affectReview of systematic reviewsMeta-analyses of RCTsWell-beingModerate-quality evidenceInduced small decreasesMeta-analytic statisticsPsychological interventionsPracticing gratitudeRecommendations AssessmentLife satisfactionAffectSystematic reviewMeta-analysesControlled Trials
2016
Physiotherapist-delivered cognitive-behavioural interventions are effective for low back pain, but can they be replicated in clinical practice? A systematic review
Hall A, Richmond H, Copsey B, Hansen Z, Williamson E, Jones G, Fordham B, Cooper Z, Lamb S. Physiotherapist-delivered cognitive-behavioural interventions are effective for low back pain, but can they be replicated in clinical practice? A systematic review. Disability And Rehabilitation 2016, 40: 1-9. PMID: 27871193, DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1236155.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLow back painHigh-quality evidenceBack painQuality of lifeCB interventionProvider trainingCognitive-behavioral interventionsPatient outcomesDifferent health care professionalsOutcomes of disabilityTrial of patientsModerate-quality evidenceAdditional trainingPhysical therapy settingHealth care professionalsExercise interventionGRADE approachIntervention reportingPsychosocial symptomsTreatment benefitLong-term effectsPainCare professionalsShort-term benefitsTreatment approaches
2015
Comparative effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis
Singh S, Khera R, Allen AM, Murad MH, Loomba R. Comparative effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis. Hepatology 2015, 62: 1417-1432. PMID: 26189925, DOI: 10.1002/hep.27999.Peer-Reviewed Reviews, Practice Guidelines, Standards, and Consensus StatementsConceptsModerate-quality evidenceNonalcoholic steatohepatitisObeticholic acidLobular inflammationBallooning degenerationVitamin ERelative riskComparative effectivenessBiopsy-proven nonalcoholic steatohepatitisLow-quality evidenceUse of pentoxifyllineIndirect treatment comparisonFuture comparative trialsHigh-quality evidenceConfidence intervalsQuality of evidenceDistinct histological featuresRecommendations AssessmentSecondary outcomesPrimary outcomeCombination therapyFibrosis stageHistological featuresComparative trialsPharmacological interventions
2011
Framing of health information messages
Akl EA, Oxman AD, Herrin J, Vist GE, Terrenato I, Sperati F, Costiniuk C, Blank D, Schünemann H. Framing of health information messages. Cochrane Database Of Systematic Reviews 2011, cd006777. PMID: 22161408, DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd006777.pub2.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsStandardized mean differenceHealth professionalsPre-planned subgroup analysisScreening testCochrane Central RegisterModerate-quality evidenceRelated systematic reviewsCross-over studyQuality of evidenceHealth information messagesChance of mortalityCentral RegisterGRADE approachControlled TrialsPrimary outcomeReview authorsData collectionAdverse outcomesLanguage restrictionsQuality evidenceSubgroup analysisReference listsSystematic reviewChances of survivalMean difference
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply