2022
Lack of association between pandemic chilblains and SARS-CoV-2 infection
Gehlhausen JR, Little AJ, Ko CJ, Emmenegger M, Lucas C, Wong P, Klein J, Lu P, Mao T, Jaycox J, Wang E, Ugwu N, Muenker C, Mekael D, Klein R, Patrignelli R, Antaya R, McNiff J, Damsky W, Kamath K, Shon J, Ring A, Yildirim I, Omer S, Ko A, Aguzzi A, Iwasaki A, Obaid A, Lu-Culligan A, Nelson A, Brito A, Nunez A, Martin A, Watkins A, Geng B, Kalinich C, Harden C, Todeasa C, Jensen C, Kim D, McDonald D, Shepard D, Courchaine E, White E, Song E, Silva E, Kudo E, DeIuliis G, Rahming H, Park H, Matos I, Nouws J, Valdez J, Fauver J, Lim J, Rose K, Anastasio K, Brower K, Glick L, Sharma L, Sewanan L, Knaggs L, Minasyan M, Batsu M, Petrone M, Kuang M, Nakahata M, Campbell M, Linehan M, Askenase M, Simonov M, Smolgovsky M, Sonnert N, Naushad N, Vijayakumar P, Martinello R, Datta R, Handoko R, Bermejo S, Prophet S, Bickerton S, Velazquez S, Alpert T, Rice T, Khoury-Hanold W, Peng X, Yang Y, Cao Y, Strong Y. Lack of association between pandemic chilblains and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences Of The United States Of America 2022, 119: e2122090119. PMID: 35217624, PMCID: PMC8892496, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2122090119.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSARS-CoV-2 infectionPrior SARS-CoV-2 infectionSARS-CoV-2PC biopsiesAcute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemicSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemicT-cell receptor sequencingCell receptor sequencingT cell responsesCoronavirus 2 pandemicEnzyme-linked immunosorbent assayLack of associationCOVID toesSkin eruptionAntibody responseImmunohistochemistry studiesBackground seroprevalenceTissue microarrayViral infectionStimulation assaysCell responsesInfectionChilblainsImmunosorbent assayAbortive infection
1975
Differences between laboratory strains of Epstein-Barr virus based on immortalization, abortive infection and interference.
Miller G, Robinson J, Heston L, Lipman M. Differences between laboratory strains of Epstein-Barr virus based on immortalization, abortive infection and interference. 1975, 395-408. PMID: 190145.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsEpstein-Barr virusEarly antigenH virusInitiation of immortalizationAntibody-negative human serumPretreatment of lymphocytesNon-producer cell linesCell linesHuman umbilical cordHuman serumInfectious mononucleosisCarrier cell linesB95-8Umbilical cordBurkitt's lymphomaLymphocyte immortalizationDNA synthesisLaboratory strainsStimulation of DNAHuman lymphocytesLymphocytesBiological behaviorPrimary culturesAbortive infectionAntigen
1974
Differences Between Laboratory Strains of Epstein-Barr Virus Based on Immortalization, Abortive Infection, and Interference
Miller G, Robinson J, Heston L, Lipman M. Differences Between Laboratory Strains of Epstein-Barr Virus Based on Immortalization, Abortive Infection, and Interference. Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences Of The United States Of America 1974, 71: 4006-4010. PMID: 4372601, PMCID: PMC434316, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.71.10.4006.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsEB virusEarly antigenH virusInitiation of immortalizationAntibody-negative human serumEpstein-Barr virusPretreatment of lymphocytesCell linesHuman umbilical cordDNA synthesisHuman serumInfectious mononucleosisCarrier cell linesBiologic behaviorB95-8Umbilical cordBurkitt's lymphomaLymphocyte immortalizationNonproducer cell linesHuman lymphocytesLaboratory strainsLymphocytesBiologic activityPrimary culturesAbortive infection
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply